| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Medical School-Houston, Houston, TX, evan.g.pivalizza{at}uth.tmc.edu
To the Editor:
Luckner et al., reported transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) documented systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve and left ventricular outflow obstruction in 3 noncardiac surgical patients (1). We are concerned that, in their haste to insert the TEE, the authors have digressed from sound anesthesia care. Vigorous resuscitation with crystalloids, colloids, and vasoconstrictors are standard responses in the hypovolemic patient, and the TEE diagnoses did not alter logical management in any of the cases.
Case 1. The patient was hypertensive, elderly, with bilateral femur fractures, all associated with intravascular volume contraction, and received a large propofol dose (2.5 mg/kg). Resuscitation was with crystalloid only and an
+ ß agonist. Only after TEE was colloid and phenylephrine (logical pure
-agonist) initiated.
Case 2. Extensive bleeding was diagnosed, with minimal crystalloid resuscitation. Only after TEE was colloid administered. A pure vasoconstrictor would also have been a logical simultaneous choice.
Case 3. This elderly, hypertensive patient received a large dose (2.5 mg/kg) of propofol. Hypotension would be anticipated and resuscitation with crystalloids, colloids, and phenylephrine would be appropriate choices, but were only initiated after TEE.
TEE may be of value in hypotensive noncardiac surgical patients, but insertion and focus on TEE images should not detract from logical clinical decisions. TEE-guided management in these cases should have been no different from that already instituted.
Reference
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|