JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eger, E. I.
Right arrow Articles by Sonner, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Eger, E. I., II
Right arrow Articles by Sonner, J. M.

Anesth Analg 2006;102:967
© 2006 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000190857.67309.1E


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

TIVA, Awareness, and the Brice Interview

Edmond I. Eger, II, MD, and James M. Sonner, MD

Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, CA, egere{at}anesthesia.ucsf.edu

In Response:

Enlund questions our suggestion (1) that recall may be more likely during IV versus inhaled anesthesia. We agree that there is no proper answer because no adequate prospective study has been done. Our argument notes the absence of an online, direct measure of a total IV anesthetic concentration at the effect site. The available indirect measures of suppression of awareness or anesthetic concentration at the effect site (e.g., the Bispectral Index or BIS monitor) do not produce consistent results (2). In contrast, the partial pressure of an inhaled anesthetic at the effect site can be measured, albeit with a modest time delay, as the end-tidal concentration of anesthetic.

Experimental difficulties compound the problem. We suggest that Brice's structured interview (3) does not provide a solution and agree with Dr. Enlund's suggestion "that the diagnostic potential of the interview technique is not optimal." Brice's structured interview poses three questions to patients after their anesthesia: "What was the last thing you remembered happening before you went to sleep?" "What is the first thing you remember happening on waking?" and "Did you dream or have any other experiences while you were asleep?" We are not convinced that such questions would reveal remembrance. The subjects of Brice's study also received auditory input of tape recordings of either choir music or piano music or nothing during their anesthesia and were asked if they heard one or the other. "Twelve of the patients....claimed to be able with absolute or considerable certainty to identify the tape recording which had been played. Four of these chose the correct tape, four recognized the opposite tape to the one which had been played, and four recognized a tape when no tape had been played. There is thus in this series little evidence that the tape recordings played could be recalled."

We continue to believe what we argued in our letter (1): "Awareness during anesthesia is difficult to certify objectively. In our view it requires remembrance of an event by the patient that uniquely connects that remembrance to an event unequivocally occurring during anesthesia/surgery." By such criteria, remembrance of events during adequate levels of anesthesia (e.g., more than 0.5 MAC of a potent inhaled anesthetic) is rare. The reasoning discussed in paragraph 1 of our response suggests that it would be rarer with inhaled anesthetics.

References

  1. Eger EI II, Sonner JM. How likely is awareness during anesthesia? Anesth Analg 2005;100:1544.[Free Full Text]
  2. Schneider G, Gelb AW, Schmeller B, et al. Detection of awareness in surgical patients with EEG-based indices: bispectral index and patient state index. Br J Anaesth 2003;91:329–35.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Brice DD, Hetherington RR, Utting JE. A simple study of awareness and dreaming during anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1970;42:535–42.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eger, E. I.
Right arrow Articles by Sonner, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Eger, E. I., II
Right arrow Articles by Sonner, J. M.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press