JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Das, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Babu, K. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Das, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Babu, K. S.

Anesth Analg 2006;102:967-968
© 2006 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000190858.41770.F2


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Informed Awareness: Is It Ethical?

Adhikary Sanjib Das, MD, and K. Srinivasa Babu, PhD

Department of Anaesthesia, sanjib{at}cmcvellore.ac.in(Das) Department of Neurological Sciences, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamilnadu, India(Babu)

To the Editor:

We would like to commend Professor White for bringing up the ethical issue in his Letter to the Editor (1). For unknown reasons the Bispectral Index (BIS) monitor (Aspect Medical Systems, Newton, MA) is used more commonly than other monitors to prevent intraoperative awareness as a depth of anesthesia monitor. It is almost now confirmed that BIS declines during administration of neuromuscular blocking agents (2,3), so there is definitely a possibility of awareness in totally or partially paralyzed patients if improperly anesthetized. There have been number of neurosurgical studies, particularly with reference to motor evoked potential monitoring (4,5), where BIS has been used to monitor awareness or depth of anesthesia. In those cases even with the authors precautions to prevent awareness it cannot be excluded completely because of compromised drug usage or technique requirements. On the other hand there are some neurosurgical procedures that are routinely performed under conscious sedation (e.g., awake craniotomy). Those patients give consent to be aware during the surgical procedure, as it is required during the surgical interventions to identify/monitor areas involving language or speech (6). We feel that in such cases intraoperative awareness is a necessity and acceptable in absence of any other noxious stimulus such as pain. In such cases the team involved in care of the patients should be made aware of the seriousness of the situation and take necessary steps to prevent any unwanted activities like making unnecessary sounds or irrelevant talk. If the patient gives informed consent for the readiness of being aware during such procedures then will it be ethically accepted? Or, do we have to develop new ethical guidelines and regulating process for at least for these special situations. Where do we stand ethically in these conditions?

References

  1. White PF. Awake and paralyzed: was it really necessary? Anesth Analg 2005;101:297.[Free Full Text]
  2. Seubert CN, Mahla ME. Bispectral index decline caused by neuromuscular blockade. Anesth Analg 2004;98:871.[Free Full Text]
  3. Messner M, Beese U, Romstock J, et al. The bispectral index declines during neuromuscular block in fully awake persons. Anesth Analg 2003;97:488–91.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Scheufler KM, Reinacher PC, Blumrich W, et al. The modifying effects of stimulation pattern and propofol plasma concentration on motor-evoked potentials. Anesth Analg 2005;100:440–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. van Dongen EP, ter Beek HT, Schepens MA, et al. Within patient variability of lower extremity muscle responses to transcranial electrical stimulation with pulse trains in aortic surgery. Clin Neurophysiol 1999;110:1144–8.[Medline]
  6. Sarang A, Dinsmore J. Anaesthesia for awake craniotomy: evolution of a technique that facilitates awake neurological testing. Br J Anaesth 2003;90:161–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Das, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Babu, K. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Das, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Babu, K. S.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press