JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klein, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Klein, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, D. B.

Anesth Analg 2006;102:974
© 2006 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000199175.80157.A9


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Concerns with Nerve Blocks at Home

Sanford L. Klein, DDS, MD, and Dennis B. Hall, MD

Department of Anesthesia, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, sklein{at}umdnj.edu

To the Editor:

We would like to make two observations regarding the well-written article of Ilfeld and Enneking (1).

1. There is the excellent possibility that, at least initially, when a bill is rendered to a third-party payer for reimbursement for this type of service, only more paperwork will result. In our experience, much confusion results from having to consult seldom-used (in anesthesia) CPT/HCPCS code books. Meanwhile, of course, reimbursement will be held up. We therefore recommend that to the extent possible, fees be negotiated in advance, with terms and extent of service as clear as can be.

2. A programmable infusion pump is not a bandage or a splint; it has an active component that can adversely respond to the environment. Therefore, to some extent, it increases the liability of the practitioner who is responsible for set-up and maintenance. In one sense, although we are not "Tools are Us," we are "renting" a device to a patient that can act in a few cases in unpredictable ways. This should not deter use of this treatment modality, which appears to have excellent potential, but should simply put us on guard to document and follow rigorous protocols for use.

Reference

  1. Ilfeld B, Enneking F. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks at home: a review. Anesth Analg 2005;100:1822–33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klein, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Klein, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, D. B.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press