Anesth Analg 2006;102:1043-1044
© 2006 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000198336.46894.58
CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIA
Diagnostic Dilemma: A Pacemaker Lead Inside the Left Atrium or an Echocardiographic Beam Width Artifact?
Nikolaos Skubas, MD,
Natalia Ivascu Brown, MD, and
Rakesh Mishra, MD
Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Cardiology/Echocardiography, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Nikolaos Skubas, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021. Address e-mail to njs2002{at}med.cornell.edu.
A 71-yr-old man with a permanent dual chamber pacemaker (pm), chronic atrial fibrillation with a slow ventricular response and symptomatic mitral regurgitation presented for mitral valve surgery. His intraoperative monitoring included, among others, a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) and transesophageal echocardiography. The surgical approach was from the right atrium via an atrial septotomy, and the mitral valve was replaced. After separation from cardiopulmonary bypass, a strong reflector accompanied by distal acoustic shadowing was seen inside the left atrium (LA), in the mid-esophageal bicaval view at different degrees of rotation (see video clip at www.anesthesia-analgesia.org.). Migration of the PAC into the LA via the atrial septotomy was excluded, based on the fact that central venous and pulmonary artery pressure waveforms were transduced from the proximal and distal PAC ports, respectively. We considered that one of the permanent pm leads was apparently trapped inside the LA. However, the surgeon was adamant that this had not occurred, and the chest was closed. Further transesophageal echocardiography examination, using similar acoustic windows, failed to reproduce the artifact (Fig. 1). A postoperative portable chest radiograph verified that both permanent pm leads were anchored properly at the right atrium and right ventricular apex.
View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Modified, mid-esophageal bicaval view after chest closure. A, The left atrium (LA) is at the top of the image. Inside the right atrium (RA), a prominent Eustachian valve is seen to the left, close to the junction with the inferior vena cava (IVC), below the interatrial septum (IAS). One of the pacemaker leads (PM1) is visible. B, With further rotation to 92°, the second pacemaker lead (PM2) is visualized inside the RA.
|
|
Apart from the main beam, ultrasound transducers emit secondary beams, or side lobes, propagating radially from the center of the main beam (Fig. 2). A returning echo produced by a target located in the side lobes will be displayed as if it originated inside the main beam. The ultrasound energy in the side lobes is considerably weaker than in the main beam; therefore, reflections become apparent only when they do not conflict with real, more intense echoes (1). Examples are an enlarged cardiac chamber, as in the case of a dilated aorta, when the atrial-aortic interface creates a reverberation artifact mimicking a dissection flap, (2) and/or a relatively strong reflector, such as a catheter or a wire (3). To reduce such artifacts, the gain settings should be minimized so that strong reflections from weaker lobes are decreased. If they persist, the echocardiographer may be able to differentiate an artifact from a real structure by imaging the same structure from another acoustic window. An artifact is not likely to be reproduced in multiple echocardiographic planes.
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Main and side lobes of the ultrasound beam produced by a phased array transducer. The shadowed cylinder represents the main beam, and the surrounding truncated cone and arrows the side lobes.
|
|
Shadowing is the absence of echoes behind a highly reflective target, such as mechanical devices (catheters, prostheses) or heavily calcified native structures. When shadowing occurs, an alternate acoustic window is required to view the objects or areas of interest (3).
Closure of the atrial septotomy might have altered the relative position between the interatrial septum and the pm lead. As a result, part of the latter (a strong reflector), was reflected by the side lobe, off the center of the ultrasound beam. Approximation of the sternum and the influence of the ventilated lungs may have affected the size of the LA, possibly realigning the pm lead with the main beam of the ultrasound, thus "returning" the image in its true anatomic location, inside the right atrium.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
Video images for this case can be accessed at www.anesthesia-analgesia.org. Click on Cardiovascular Anesthesia in the Contents page and then the Data Supplement link located below the title of the article.
Accepted for publication November 1, 2005.
|
References
|
|---|
- Feigenbaum H. Physics and instrumentation. In: Feigenbaum, H, Armrstrong WF, Ryan T, eds. Feigenbaums’s Echocardiography. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2005:29–32.
- Losi MA, Betocchi S, Briguori C, et al. Determinants of aortic artifacts during transesophageal echocardiography in the ascending aorta. Am Heart J 1999;137:967–72.[ISI][Medline]
- Heller LB, Aronson S. Imaging artifacts and pitfalls. In: Savage, RM, Aronson S, eds. Comprehensive textbook of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2005:41–2.
Top
References
