JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Balestrieri, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Blank, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Balestrieri, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Blank, R. S.

Anesth Analg 2006;102:1297-1298
© 2006 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000199184.14710.F9


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Efficacy of Postoperative Epidural Morphine for Postpartum Tubal Ligation

Philip J. Balestrieri, MA, MD, Paul H. Ting, MD, and Randal S. Blank, MD, PhD

Obstetric Anesthesia, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia, pjb8y{at}hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu

To the Editor:

Marcus et al. (1) suggest that postoperative pain relief is better in patients undergoing postpartum tubal ligation when epidural morphine is administered, as also suggested by Campbell et al. (2). There are several drawbacks to the use of epidural morphine in these patients. Most significantly, epidural morphine is associated with delayed respiratory depression, which may appear up to 24 h after administration. With increasing pressure on hospitals to limit the duration of stay of patients, postpartum patients undergoing tubal ligation the day after delivery are commonly discharged on the same day as the surgery. Such patients should not receive epidural morphine, as they will not be adequately monitored for ventilatory depression. There might be a case for epidural morphine if there were no acceptable alternatives and if all such patients remained in hospital for 24 h after their procedure. However, there are numerous alternatives, including infiltration by the obstetricians with local anesthetic, IV agents such as ketorolac and short-acting opioids, and traditional oral analgesics. More than 75% of such procedures worldwide are done using local anesthesia alone (3). In our view, epidural morphine may be excessive for a procedure that produces only modest postoperative pain of short duration (4).

References

  1. Marcus R-Jay L, Wong CA, Lehor A, et al. Postoperative epidural morphine for postpartum tubal ligation analgesia. Anesth Analg 2005;101:876–81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Campbell DC, Riben CM, Rooney ME, et al. Intrathecal morphine for postpartum tubal ligation postoperative analgesia. Anesth Analg 2001;93:1006–11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Pati S, Sullins V. Female sterilization, evidence. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2000;27:859–99.[Medline]
  4. Chestnut DH. Obstetric anesthesia: principles and practice. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2004:415.




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Balestrieri, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Blank, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Balestrieri, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Blank, R. S.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press