JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Narouze, S. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Narouze, S. N.

Anesth Analg 2006;102:1585
© 2006 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000215204.59811.EC


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Epidural Steroid Injections After Epidurography May Prevent Otherwise Devastating Complications

Samer N. Narouze, MD, MSc

Pain Management Department, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, narouzs{at}ccf.org

To the Editor:

I read with interest the case report by Tripathi et al. (1) regarding the development of paraplegia after intracord injection during attempted epidural steroid injection in an awake patient. I have some concerns regarding their technique.

First, the report implies that the authors did not inject a contrast agent under real-time fluoroscopy to validate epidural placement of the needle. Epidurography is useful to indicate epidural position and can help to predict the dermatomal distribution of analgesic block. At the lower thoracic and lumbar segments, the pattern of spread is significantly wider in the cephalad than caudal direction (2).

Second, it is unclear why the authors chose the T11-12 level if the patient's pain was in the T12 to L3 distribution. After injection of 10 mL volume, the expected cephalad spread is 6–7 segments (up to T5), whereas the expected caudal spread is only 2 segments (down to L2) (2).

Tripathi et al. (1) concluded that patient safety can be improved by excluding typical epidural doses of local anesthetic and/or opioids from epidural steroid injections. In my view, epidurography under real-time fluoroscopy is the key to safety for epidural steroid injections. Performing the injection at a lower lumbar level with epidurography might have saved the patient from this devastating complication.

References

  1. Tripathi M, Nath SS, Gupta RK. Paraplegia after intracord injection during attempted epidural steroid injection in an awake patient. Anesth Analg 2005;101:1209–11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Yokoyama M, Hanazaki M, Fujii H, et al. Correlation between the distribution of contrast medium and the extent of blockade during epidural anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2004;100:1504–10.[Web of Science][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Narouze, S. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Narouze, S. N.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press