JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Narouze, S. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Narouze, S. N.

Anesth Analg 2006;102:1585
© 2006 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000215193.94663.7E


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Is It Time to Perform All Thoracic Epidural Placements Under Fluoroscopy?

Samer N. Narouze, MD, MSc

Pain Management Department, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, narouzs{at}ccf.org

To the Editor:

I agree with the alarming conclusion of Tsui and Armstrong (1) that an awake patient might not provide adequate feedback during placement of a thoracic epidural catheter to preclude spinal cord injury. Although it is impossible to confirm that the spinal cord injury was a direct result of needle trauma, the localized cord edema at the site of needle entry makes cord puncture the most likely etiology. This is consistent with previous reports of a lack of paresthesia in awake subjects during spinal cord puncture (2).

I recommend that all thoracic epidurals be placed under fluoroscopic guidance with cautious advancement of the epidural needle in the lateral view and that no local anesthetic injection or catheter placement be allowed until satisfactory epidural spread of a contrast agent is confirmed with real-time fluoroscopy, as is common practice in epidural placement for treatment of chronic pain.

Although this practice will increase surgical time and cost, patient safety must come first. Performing thoracic epidural placements under fluoroscopy may not prevent inadvertent spinal cord puncture, as described by another case report in the same issue of Anesthesia & Analgesia (3). However, the use of contrast to confirm a satisfactory epidurogram may prevent additional damage to the spinal cord.

References

  1. Tsui BCH, Armstrong K. Can direct spinal cord injury occur without paresthesia? A report of delayed spinal cord injury after epidural placement in an awake patient. Anesth Analg 2005;101:1212–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Pounder D, Elliott S. An awake patient may not detect spinal cord puncture. Anaesthesia 2000;55:194.[Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Tripathi M, Nath SS, Gupta RK. Paraplegia after intracord injection during attempted epidural steroid injection in an awake patient. Anesth Analg 2005;101:1209–11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Narouze, S. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Narouze, S. N.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press