JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vaida, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Yodfat, U. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vaida, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Yodfat, U. A.

Anesth Analg 2006;103:264
© 2006 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000215213.05622.7E


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Angulation of the Airway Tube in the AMBU Laryngeal Mask Could Be Responsible for Improved Insertion Success

Sonia J. Vaida, MD, and Uriel A. Yodfat, MD

Visiting International Associate Professor Department of Anesthesiology; Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center; Hershey, Pennsylvania; Sonia.Vaida{at}comcast.net; svaida{at}psu.edu (Vaida) Riverside Anesthesia Associates; Harrisburg, Pennsylvania (Yodfat)

To the Editor:

Hagberg et al. (1) recently reported successful insertion rates of 92.4% on first attempt and 100% on second attempt for the new AMBU Laryngeal Mask. We think that the 90 degree angle incorporated into the airway tube contributes significantly to this high insertion success rate.

As previously described by Yodfat (2), creating a 90 degree angle with a rigid stylet close to the laryngeal portion of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) improves the rate of successful insertion. Jaffe and Brock-Utne (3) described a similar method for the LMA insertion using a stylet folded in half and also bent nearly 90 degrees. These data suggest that a 90 degrees angle close to the junction of the airway tube and mask, either by design, as in the Ambu Laryngeal Mask, or by inserting a rigid stylet, simplifies the insertion technique and improves the rate of successful insertion.

Footnotes

Dr. Hagberg does not wish to respond.

REFERENCES

  1. Hagberg CA, Jensen FC, Genzwuerker HV, et al. A multicenter study of the ambu laryngeal mask in nonparalyzed, anesthetized patients. Anesth Analg 2005;101:1862–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Yodfat UA. Modified technique for laryngeal mask airway insertion. Anesth Analg 1999;89:1327.[Free Full Text]
  3. Jaffe RA, Brock-Utne JG. A modification of the Yodfat laryngeal mask airway insertion technique. J Clin Anesth. 2002;14: 462–3.[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vaida, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Yodfat, U. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vaida, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Yodfat, U. A.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press