JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sosis, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sosis, M. B.

Anesth Analg 2006;103:777-778
© 2006 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000227119.00592.84


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Steven L. Shafer

On the Dose of Succinylcholine Required for Excellent Intubating Conditions

Mitchel B. Sosis, MS, MD, PhD

Board Certified Anesthesiologist; Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania; mitchelsosis{at}hotmail.com

To the Editor:

Naguib et al. (1) examined the dose of succinylcholine required for excellent tracheal intubating conditions. The authors studied intubating conditions with succinylcholine doses of 0.0, 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mg/kg. They noted that in certain situations "...any intubating conditions short of excellent may not be suitable."

Naguib et al. concluded, in part, that the incidence of excellent intubating conditions was significantly more frequent (P < 0.05) in patients who received 2.0 mg/kg succinylcholine than with 0.3 mg/kg of succinylcholine. In addition, they noted that "...increasing the dose of succinylcholine from 1.5 to 2.0 resulted in only 6.7% improvement in the incidence of excellent intubating conditions (from 80% to 86.7%)." Yet they reached the following conclusion: "It appears that there are no advantages to using doses of succinylcholine larger than 1.5 mg/kg." The authors did not evaluate fasciculations, myalgias, muscle damage, or other factors that might warrant limiting the doses of succinylcholine in their study, nor did they discuss these issues.

I would like to ask the authors on what objective basis is 1.5 mg/kg of succinylcholine recommended over 2.0 mg/kg, because their data appear to support the larger dose.

REFERENCE

  1. Naguib M, Samarkandi A, Emad El-Din M, et al. The dose of succinylcholine for excellent intubating conditions. Anesth Analg 2006;102:151–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sosis, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sosis, M. B.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press