JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Naguib, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Naguib, M.

Anesth Analg 2006;103:778
© 2006 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000227130.59931.8A


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Steven L. Shafer

On the Dose of Succinylcholine Required for Excellent Intubating Conditions

Mohamed Naguib, MD

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine; University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center; Houston, Texas; naguib{at}mdanderson.org

In Response:

Dr. Sosis (1) missed the point of our study. We (2) clearly stated that our objective was to define the dose of succinylcholine that provides excellent intubation conditions in 90% of the patients within 60 s during a simulated rapid-sequence induction of anesthesia. Because it was not our study's objective to evaluate fasciculations, myalgias, or muscle damage, we did not address these issues in our paper. Further, this information is readily available in the literature. For instance, Hochhalter (3) and Mingus et al. (4) evaluated the incidence of fasciculations and myalgias after 1.5 mg/kg succinylcholine.

Dr. Sosis' view that our data appear to support the 2.0 mg/kg over 1.5 mg/kg dose of succinylcholine is erroneous. The 6.7% improvement in the incidence of excellent intubating conditions after 2.0 mg/kg compared with 1.5 mg/kg dose of succinylcholine was not statistically significant. If the sample size were increased to 250 per group (rather than 30 per group) the 7% difference might be statistically significant. The most important lesson of our study is this: probably no dose of succinylcholine can guarantee >90% excellent conditions within 60 s.

REFERENCES

  1. Sosis MB. On the dose of succinylcholine required for excellent intubating conditions. Anesth Analg 2006;103:777–8.[Free Full Text]
  2. Naguib M, Samarkandi AH, El-Din ME, et al. The dose of succinylcholine required for excellent endotracheal intubating conditions. Anesth Analg 2006;102:151–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Hochhalter CM. Evaluation of succinylcholine-induced fasciculations and myalgias with or without atracurium pretreatment. AANA J 1996;64:336–40.[Medline]
  4. Mingus ML, Herlich A, Eisenkraft JB. Attenuation of suxamethonium myalgias: effect of midazolam and vecuronium. Anaesthesia 1990;45:834–7.[Web of Science][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
R. P. Olson and D. Lubarsky
Anemia Screening in Elective Surgery: Definition, Significance and Patients' Interests
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2006; 103(3): 779 - 780.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Naguib, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Naguib, M.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press