JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ames, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dear, G. D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ames, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dear, G. D. L.

Anesth Analg 2006;103:792
© 2006 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000227153.01588.F1


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Steven L. Shafer

Long-Term Use of the Laryngeal Mask Airway in a Neonate

Warwick A. Ames, MBBS, FRCA, Stephanie F. Fischer, FCA(SA), Scott Schulman, MD, and Guy De Lisle Dear, MB, FRCA

Division of Pediatric Anesthesia; Duke University Medical Center; Durham, North Carolina; ames0002{at}mc.duke.edu

To the Editor:

The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is now an established tool in neonatal airway management in both elective and emergent scenarios (1,2). We report a case in which a LMA was left in situ for 8 days without adverse sequelae, the longest reported use of a LMA in a neonate.

A 3-wk-old male infant with profound micrognathia presented for ligation of a patent ductus arteriosus. After an inhaled induction of anesthesia, fiberoptic intubation with an endotracheal tube (3.0-mm inner diameter Mallinckrodt) was performed through the LMA (size 1.0 LMA UniqueTM). Postoperatively the patient was transferred back to the neonatal intensive care unit with the expectation that extubation and removal of the LMA would be performed within the following 24 h. The LMA cuff was deflated. However, the patient's condition deteriorated, necessitating inotropic support and nitric oxide. Eight days later he patient was transferred to the operating room and the LMA was cut from the endotracheal tube. The otolaryngology attending physician examined the patient's oropharynx and found no apparent injury associated with the long-term application of the LMA.

In our literature search we found only 2 case reports of extended-duration LMA placement in the neonatal population. Bucx et al. (3) managed the care of a 10-day old neonate with Treacher Collins syndrome by using the LMA for 4 days with no evidence of pharyngolaryngeal injury. Yao et al. (4) used it in a neonate with Pierre Robin syndrome for 6 days, changing it daily to relieve mucosal pressure. Our case differs from those just cited: the duration was 8 days, the LMA was not exchanged and it was kept fully deflated.

Based on what we learned from the limited scientific literature available and our own experience, we believe long-term LMA use in the neonatal population is a feasible and potentially safe technique for handling complex upper airway management.

REFERENCES

  1. Leal-Pavey YR. Use of the LMA classic to secure the airway of a premature neonate with Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome: a case report. AANA J 2004;72:427–30.[Medline]
  2. Trevisanuto D, Micaglio M, Ferrarese P, Zanardo V. The laryngeal mask airway: potential applications in neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004;89:F485–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Bucx MJL, Grolman W, Kruisinga FH, et al. The prolonged use of the laryngeal mask airway in a neonate with airway obstruction and Treacher Collins syndrome. Paediatr Anaesth 2003;13:530–3.[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Yao CT, Wang JN, Tai YT, et al. Successful management of a neonate with Pierre-Robin syndrome and severe upper airway obstruction by long term placement of a laryngeal mask airway. Resuscitation 2004;61:97–9.[Web of Science][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ames, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dear, G. D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ames, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dear, G. D. L.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press