Anesth Analg 2007;104:236
© 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000248998.17277.a8
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Editor-in-Chief Steven L. Shafer
Errant Thoracic Epidural Catheterization
Ali Alagöz, MD,
Hilal Sazak, MD,
Songül Özkazanç, MD, and
Eser Savkiliodlu, MD
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Atatürk Chest Disease and Thoracic Surgery Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, hilalgun{at}yahoo.com
To the Editor:
We recently experienced an errant thoracic epidural catheter similar to that reported by Inoue et al. (1). A 20-yr-old man (weight, 67 kg; height, 181 cm) underwent left-sided thoracotomy for a pulmonary hydatic cyst. Before inducing general anesthesia, we inserted a thoracic epidural catheter for postthoracotomy pain management. We used the hanging-drop technique combined with median approach with the patient in the lateral decubitus position, and placed the epidural catheter at the T8-9 intervertebral space. After detecting negative pressure with the hanging drop, we advanced the epidural catheter 5 cm beyond the introducer needle tip, without technical difficulties. A test dose of 1% lidocaine 3 mL excluded unintentional subarachnoid injection. After induction, we placed a left-sided, double-lumen tube, permitting deflation of the left lung. Approximately 1 h after surgery began, the surgeon located the epidural catheter in the left pleural cavity (Fig. 1). We immediately withdrew the catheter. The anesthetic proceeded unremarkably.
The hanging-drop technique cannot distinguish the pleural cavity from the epidural space. Therefore, we believe one should demonstrate neural blockade to verify that the catheter is in the epidural space before the induction of general anesthesia.
REFERENCE
- Inoue S, Nishimine N, Furuya H. Unintentional intrapleural insertion of an epidural catheter: should we remove it or leave it in situ to provide perioperative analgesia? Anesth Analg 2005;100:2668.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|