| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation with high peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) induces lung injury and bacterial translocation from the lung into the systemic circulation. We investigated the effects of increased inspiratory time on translocation of intratracheally inoculated bacteria during mechanical ventilation with and without extrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). METHODS: Rats were ventilated in pressure-controlled mode with 14 cm H2O PIP, 0 cm H2O PEEP, I:E ratio 1/2, and Fio2 1.0. Subsequently, 0.5 mL of 105 cfu/mL Pseudomonas aeruginosa was inoculated through tracheostomy and rats were randomly assigned to six groups; two low-pressure groups (LP)1/2, 14 cm H2O PIP, 0 cm H2O PEEP, I:E = 1/2, and LP2/1 14 cm H2O PIP, 0 cm H2O PEEP, I:E = 2/1; two high-pressure groups (HP)1/2, 30 cm H2O PIP, 0 cm H2O PEEP, I:E = 1/2, and HP2/1, 30 cm H2O PIP, 0 cm H2O PEEP, I:E = 2/1; two HP PEEP groups (HPP)1/2, 30 cm H2O PIP, 10 cm H2O PEEP, I:E = 1/2, and HPP2/1, 30 cm H2O PIP, 10 cm H2O PEEP, I:E = 2/1. Blood cultures were obtained every 30 min. The rats were killed and their lungs were processed. RESULTS: When compared with baseline values, Pao2 decreased in the LP1/2, LP2/1, HP1/2, and HP2/1 groups at the last time point, but the decline in Pao2 reached statistical significance in only the HP1/2 group. The bacterial translocation rate was greater in group HPP2/1 than group HPP1/2 (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We found that high PIP, with or without prolonged inspiratory time, increased the rate of bacterial dissemination. PEEP prevented bacterial translocation in the high PIP group. However, the protective effect of PEEP was lost when inspiratory time was prolonged.
Mechanical ventilation is widely used as a supportive treatment for respiratory failure in intensive care units. Although it is a life-saving procedure, the use of mechanical ventilation might cause several life-threatening complications. A number of experimental and clinical studies have demonstrated that mechanical ventilation can induce or exacerbate lung injury (13), which has been called "ventilator-induced lung injury" (VILI). Inverse ratio ventilation (IRV) is a ventilatory concept that can be used in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome to improve gas exchange (4,5). IRV is defined by an inspiratory-to-expiratory time ratio (I:E) of more than one. The mechanisms by which IRV improves gas exchange have not been completely elucidated. The observed increment in mean airway pressure (MawP) and intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (i-PEEP) as a result of prolonged inspiratory time during IRV may be responsible for the improved gas exchange. The same changes caused by IRV on airway pressure, however, may also contribute to VILI. Casetti et al. (6) found that increasing the inspiratory time during high pressure/high volume mechanical ventilation was associated with increases in various measures of lung injury. Lung pathology, lung wet weight to dry weight ratio, oxygenation, and respiratory mechanics have all been used as a marker of VILI. Similarly, translocation of intratracheally inoculated bacteria has also been used as a marker of lung injury (7). The effects of different mechanical ventilation variables, such as positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), tidal volume (VT), peak airway pressure, and recruitment maneuvers, have been studied on the translocation of intratracheally inoculated bacteria in several experimental studies (79). The effect of inspiratory time on translocation of intratracheally instilled bacteria is unclear. In the present study, we investigated the effects of increased airway pressure and inspiratory time, with or without PEEP, on bacterial translocation during mechanical ventilation. We hypothesized that increasing the duration of applied inspiratory pressure by inverse ratio ventilation would increase the rate of bacterial translocation
The Institutional Animal Investigation Committee approved the study protocol. Care and handling of the animals were in accordance with the European community guidelines. In this study we used 36 Sprague Dawley rats weighing 250300 g.
Animal Preparation
Preparation and Instillation of Bacteria First blood samples were obtained from each rat at baseline before instillation of the bacterial solution. Then 500 µL of saline containing 105 cfu/mL P. aeruginosa was injected into the trachea by the same method we used for previous experiments (9). To maximize the distribution of bacteria through the lungs, 5 mL of air was injected after the bacterial instillation. After instillation of bacteria, we obtained the blood samples at 30, 60, 90, and 120 min. We then inoculated a sterile tube containing brainheart solution with the blood and performed four serial dilutions using four additional tubes. All tubes were incubated at 35°C overnight and the turbidity in each tube was assessed over 7 days. We measured the time to turbidity and obtained subcultures on blood agar and MacConkey agar. Bacteremia was defined as the presence of one or more colonies of P. aeruginosa in the blood. Isolated bacteria were identified by using standard microbiological methods (10).
Experimental Protocol After inoculation, rats were randomly divided into six groups:
Blood cultures were obtained under sterile conditions every 30 min during the 2-h study period, and ventilatory variables, MAP, and rectal temperature were recorded at the same time. Immediately after the 2-h study period, the rats were killed by an intraperitoneal injection of sodium thiopental (120 mg/kg). The thorax was opened using an aseptic surgical technique under 5 cm H2O continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and the lungs were removed together with the heart.
Morphologic Evaluation
Statistical Analysis
Oxygenation and Gas Exchange Results There were no differences in baseline pH, Pao2, and Paco2 values among the groups (Table 1). Vt increased in the HP1/2 group (14.5 ± 0.6 mL to 21.3 ± 3.7 mL) and the HP2/1 (13.5 ± 1.6 mL to 20 ± 3.3 mL) groups when compared with LP and HPP groups. Vt remained unchanged in the LP and HPP groups. When compared with baseline values, Pao2 decreased in the LP1/2, LP2/1, HP1/2, and HP2/1 groups at the last time point, but the decline in Pao2 reached statistical significance in only the HP1/2 group (370 ± 167 mm Hg to 94 ± 36 mm Hg) (P < 0.05). Oxygenation remained stable throughout the experiment in the HPP1/2 and HPP2/1 groups. Paco2 decreased in the HP1/2 group (36.3 ± 11.3 mm Hg to 29 ± 10.8 mm Hg) and HP2/1 group (31.8 ± 5.6 mm Hg to 23.6 ± 8.2 mm Hg) and increased in the HPP1/2 group (36 ± 10.5 mm Hg to 54.6 ± 8.1 mm Hg) relative to baseline values. These differences were statistically significant only in the HPP1/2 group (P = 0.02). Arterial pH decreased in the HPP1/2 group because of the increase in Paco2 (P = 0.02). We did not observe any differences in arterial pH in any other group.
We recorded MAP continuously during the experimental protocol, but performed statistical analyses for values measured at 30, 60, 90, and 120 min. Relative to baseline values MAP decreased in all groups at the end of the experiment. MAP significantly decreased only in the HP2/1 group at the end of the experiment and stayed relatively similar throughout the experiment. We did not observe significant changes in any groups before the 120th min time point. Higher amounts of fluids were administered in IRV groups; however, these differences did not reach statistical significance (LP1/2 15.6 ± 0.5 mL, LP2/1 18.6 ± 1.5 mL, HP1/2 19 ± 1.4 mL, HP2/1 22 ± 5 mL, HPP1/2 18.8 ± 1.7 mL, HPP2/1 21.1 ± 1.4 mL). When compared with baseline, MawP values increased in LP2/1, HP1/2, HP2/1, HPP1/2, and HPP2/1 groups at 30 min (P < 0.05). As a result of high PEEP and/prolonged inspiratory time, MawP was higher in the HPP2/1 group when compared with the other groups (P < 0.05). Table 1 shows Pao2, Paco2, pH, airway pressures, MAP, and Vt at baseline and at the end of the experiment.
Blood Culture Results
As mentioned earlier, MawP was higher in the HPP2/1 group relative to other groups. We found a correlation between MawP and translocation rate (P = 0.037) (Fig. 2).
The comparison between translocation rates for groups HPP1/2 and HPP2/1 was significant (P = 0.01) at the 90 and 120 min time points. In the HP2/1 group the first positive blood culture was found at 90 min. At the end of experiment, four rats exhibited positive blood cultures in this group. In the HP1/2 and HPP1/2 groups, positive blood cultures were observed only at the end of the experiment, 120 min. Although a few rats had positive blood cultures in the HP1/2 and HP2/1 groups, these findings were not statistically significant when compared with the HPP2/1 group. Table 2 summarizes the blood culture results from each group as a function of time.
Histology Results
The present study reports the following major findings: 1) intratracheal instillation of P. aeruginosa significantly worsened oxygenation only in the HP and normal inspiratory time group (HP1/2); 2) the rate of dissemination of intratracheally instilled bacteria from the alveoli to the bloodstream increased with increasing PIP and I:E ratio, 3) 10 cm H2O of PEEP did not prevent translocation of bacteria in the prolonged inspiratory time group, 4) there was a correlation between MawP and bacterial translocation rate. In spite of the bacterial challenge, increasing I:E ratio protected oxygenation. Although the exact mechanism of IRV on oxygenation has not been clearly delineated, increasing MawP and iPEEP values were most likely responsible for improving gas exchange (11). We did not find any iPEEP in the prolonged inspiratory time groups. However, we used only I:E of 2/1. If we had used ratios of I:E 3/1 or 4/1, we might then have observed an increase in iPEEP. Based on our available data, we cannot fully predict the effect of higher I:E ratios on the rate of bacterial translocation. Increasing the inspiratory time fraction with IRV may cause a significant increase in MawP and impede venous return (12). We observed a decrease in MAP; however this change was not statistically significant in the HPP 2/1 group, which had the highest MawP. Our results are consistent with previous studies (13,14), which demonstrated no significant alteration in cardiac output when the inspiratory period was no more than two times that allowed for expiration. Several investigators have studied bacterial translocation through the lungs (79). Verbrugge et al. (8) demonstrated that mechanical ventilation with a combination of PIP of 30 cm H2O without PEEP induced Klebsiella pneumonia bacteremia after 3 h. They obtained blood cultures after only 3 h of mechanical ventilation. Therefore, the onset of dissemination in their experimental model could not be determined. In our study, the number of positive blood cultures in the HP1/2 group was 3/5 at the end of the experiment. In this group, we did not observe any positive blood cultures before 120 min. Conceviably, if we had prolonged our experimental protocol longer than 120 min, we might have found more positive cultures at the end of the experiment. Cakar et al. (9) also demonstrated that high inflation pressures (45 cm H2O PIP) without PEEP caused dissemination of intratracheally inoculated bacteria into the systemic circulation in rats. However, in that study, repetitive recruitment maneuvers (45 cm H2O CPAP for 30 s every 15 min for 2 h) did not cause translocation of bacteria. Nahum et al. (7) showed that over-distention of the lungs caused bacterial translocation and increased lung injury in dogs. In that study, the high transpulmonary pressure with low-PEEP group (35 cm H2O PIP and 3 cm H2O PEEP) had the earliest positive blood culture at 30 min. Furthermore, the number of animals that developed positive blood cultures in this group was more than that in other groups (ventilated with 13 cm H2O PIP and 3 cm H2O PEEP and 30 cm H2O PIP and 10 cm H2O PEEP). In the same study, PEEP had a protective effect on bacteremia despite lung over-distention. Our study differs from previous studies, as we explored the effect of PIP, PEEP, and inspiratory time on bacterial translocation. Our findings suggest that over-distention is the main determinant of bacterial translocation. The correlation of the translocation rate with MawP supports this hypothesis. Repetitive opening and closing may also promote bacterial translocation. PEEP, by stabilizing unstable alveoli, may prevent repetitive opening and closing and translocation of bacteria. However, prolonging inspiratory time may accentuate over-distention and override the protective effect of PEEP. Van Kaam et al. (15) induced pneumonia by intratracheal injection of Group B streptococci. They noted that animals that had preexisting lavage-induced lung injury developed bacteremia sooner and more readily than those with normal lungs. In lavaged animals, treatment with exogenous surfactant and an "open lung" ventilation strategy (accomplished by using a recruitment procedure and setting PEEP 2 cm H2O above closing pressure) protected against development of bacteremia. The best results were obtained when both an "open lung" ventilatory strategy and exogenous surfactant were used (15). These results suggest that both the presence of underlying lung injury and forces acting on the lungs by the ventilator influence translocation of bacteria from the lungs into the systemic circulation. Savel et al. (16) studied bacterial translocation in a rabbit model. They instilled P. aeruginosa into the lung then ventilated with either high Vt (15 mL/kg) or low Vt (6 mL/kg) and a PEEP level of 35 cm H2O for both groups. Even though their results did not reach statistical significance, they observed early bacteremia in animals which were ventilated with the "high stretch" mode of mechanical ventilation. A number of investigators have demonstrated a relationship between airway pressure and VILI. However, very few studies explored the effect of inspiratory time on VILI. Casetti et al. (6) demonstrated that inspiratory time can affect the degree of lung injury associated with high pressure mechanical ventilation. In contrast to their findings at a PIP of 30 cm H2O, we found better histological variables in the prolonged inspiratory time group when compared with the normal inspiratory time group. Casetti et al. (6) used higher peak airway pressure (45 cm H2O) in their study, and the effect of inspiratory time may have been masked by the extent of lung injury caused by airway pressure. Our study has certain limitations. First, the ventilation period was limited to 2 h. Prolonging this period might have changed our results. Second, we did not make homogenate cultures of the lungs at the end of the experiment, so we do not know the rate of bacterial growth in each group. Third, we only measured MAP, which does not fully reflect the hemodynamic changes caused by IRV. It is possible that cardiac output changed throughout the experiment. In summary, in our experimental protocol in rats increasing PIP and I:E ratio promoted bacterial translocation. The possible protective effect of PEEP was lost at higher I:E ratios.
We demonstrated that prolonged inspiratory time increases the rate of dissemination of intratracheally inoculated bacteria. This effect was correlated with MawP. Moreover, the potential protective effect of PEEP was lost when it was added to IRV. Our data suggest that for development of VILI, the duration of high pressure exposure may be as important as high inspiratory pressures. Determination of the exact role of inspiratory time in promoting lung injury will require a series of experiments that explore the combined effects of I:E ratio on MawP, total PEEP, and hemodynamics.
The authors acknowledge Dr. Avi Nahum for his advice and comments during the preparation of this article. This study was performed in the experimental laboratory founded by Prof. Dr. Kutay Akpir in Istanbul University in Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care.
Accepted for publication November 6, 2006. Supported by Istanbul University Grant 1561-16012001.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|