JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van de Velde, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Van de Velde, M.

Anesth Analg 2007;104:454
© 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000253680.03900.9c


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Section Editor:
Lawrence Saidman

Hyperbaric Bupivacaine and Maternal Hemodynamics

Marc Van de Velde, MD, PhD

Department of Anesthesiology; UZ Leuven; Leuven, Belgium; marc.vandevelde{at}uz.kuleuven.ac.be

In Response:

We thank Drs. Katz and Panni (1) for their interest in our work (2). The aim of our study was to demonstrate the better hemodynamic profile associated with low-dose spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery as compared with higher doses. As suggested, the spread of local anesthetic might influence the degree of hypotension. However, we could not identify such a correlation in our trial. We measured the spread of local anesthetic using absence or presence of cold sensation. The test may not have been sensitive enough to detect modest differences. Our results might have been different if we would have used a different sensory modality such as light touch or pinprick.

Drs. Katz and Panni ask whether differences in patient weight were important. We agree that body habitus might influence local anesthetic spread as in the case report cited in their Letter, but the literature suggests only a weak correlation between weight and local anesthetic spread within the "normal" (body mass index <35) pregnant patient population (3). Reanalysis of our data does not suggest any correlation between patient weight and anesthetic spread.

REFERENCES

  1. Katz J, Panni MK. Hyperbaric bupivacaine and maternal hemodynamics. Anesth Analg 2007;104:454.[Free Full Text]
  2. Van de Velde M, Van Schoubroeck D, Jani J, et al. Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: dose-dependent effects of hyperbaric bupivacaine on maternal hemodynamics. Anesth Analg 2006;103: 187–90.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Pitkanen MT. Body mass and spread of spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine. Anesth Analg 1987;66:127–31.[Web of Science][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van de Velde, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Van de Velde, M.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2007 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press