| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||



||
From the *Department of Anesthesiology, Magee Womens Hospital of University of Pittsburgh Medical center; Departments of
Bioengineering and
Pathology,
The Institute for Transfusion Medicine; and ||McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Jonathan H. Waters, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Magee Womens Hospital of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 300 Halket St., Suite 3510, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. Address e-mail to watejh{at}upmc.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: Whole blood was placed in 60-mL aliquots either in a beaker or on a flat surface and suctioned at 100 and 300 mm Hg. The amount of hemolysis was measured and compared under the varying conditions. The experiments were repeated with the blood diluted with normal saline solution in a 1:1 mix.
RESULTS: Hemolysis ranged from 0.21% to 2.29%. Hemolysis was greatest when whole blood was suctioned from a flat surface at 300 mm Hg. It was reduced when the blood was diluted with saline. Blood suctioned from a surgical field during cell salvage should be done with minimal suction pressures and with the goal of minimizing bloodair interfaces.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant reduction of blood damage can be obtained by diluting blood with normal saline while suctioning it from the surgical field. Although immediate hemolysis due to suctioning was not very high, the red blood cell damage from suctioning produced by a dynamic bloodair interface might adversely affect the efficiency of cell salvage.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In an attempt to optimize the capture and return of red blood cells (RBCs), many cell salvage programs minimize the suction pressure used to aspirate blood from the surgical field (6). Minimizing the suction pressure reduces the mechanical injury to RBCs, which is mostly due to air bubbles mixing with the blood in the suction cannulae and the tubing connecting the surgical site with the salvage device. The air aspirated with blood during suctioning produces fast-moving bubbles, which expand and collide in the negative pressure environment, generating mechanical stress on the RBCs.
Aspiration of air along with blood is a significant cause of RBC damage during processes other than cell salvage. Entrained air during cardiotomy suction damages blood during extracorporeal circulation (7). The blood-air interface contributes to hemolysis in artificial organs (8). Air damages blood in bubble oxygenators as the result of the interfacial denaturation of plasma proteins (9). This causes both sublethal RBC damage (10) and hemolysis of the RBCs (11,12).
In this study, an in vitro model was developed to mimic the trauma sustained by RBCs during the suctioning. We measured the effect of suction tip immersion in blood when compared with suctioning from a flat surface to determine ways in which the mechanical injury might be minimized.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
For each experiment, 23 U of same type whole blood were mixed in a 2-L beaker with a plastic covered metal stirring rod and kept continually mixed using a magnetic stirrer (Thermolyne, Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA). For each experiment, the age of the pooled blood was identical. Before commencing the experiments, a sample of the blood was taken for analysis of plasma-free hemoglobin (plfHb) to measure the baseline degree of hemolysis present in the mixed blood.
Sixty milliliters of blood was taken from the beaker and placed in a separate small beaker meant to simulate blood drawn from a deep wound. Similarly, 60 mL of blood was placed onto a flat tray covered with a textured plastic material. This was intended to replicate a flat surgical site surface. The blood was then suctioned from either location using a standard Yankauer suction catheter tip (Medi-Vac Yankauer Suction Handle, Catalog K87, Cardinal Health, McGaw Park, IL). The blood was collected into a patient suction canister. The tubing connecting the catheter and a canister was 3 m long with a 6-mm internal diameter (Medi-Vac nonconductive suction tube, Cardinal Health). Suction pressure was regulated using the regulated suction from a COBE BRAT cell salvage device (Arvada, CO). Two suction pressures (100 and 300 mm Hg) were used. The amount of hemolysis induced by suctioning was calculated for each pressure. Suction pressure on the machine was calibrated by the manufacturer during regular machine servicing. Each experiment was performed in duplicate. In addition, 60 mL of blood was mixed with 60 mL of normal saline and suctioned at 300 mm Hg from both simulated surgical sites. After each run, the flow system was thoroughly washed with saline, and the patient suction canister was replaced.
From the collected blood, a 5 mL sample was placed into a 7-mL red top vacutainer tube and centrifuged at 3600 rpm for 20 min at room temperature. Blood hematocrit (HCT) was measured (Hematocrit Centrifuge, IEC Clay Adams) in each sample before centrifugation. The supernatant from each sample was transferred to a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube and recentrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 15 min at room temperature (Eppendorf 5417R Centrifuge, Hamburg, Germany). The supernatant was then transferred to a spectrophotometer cuvette (1.5 mL semimicro-UV methacrylate cuvette, Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) and the plfHb was determined in mg/dL by measuring light absorbance of the samples at 540 nm (Spectronic Genesys 5 Spectrophotometer, Spectronic Instruments, Columbus, OH). The difference between plfHb in the baseline sample and the suctioned sample represented an increase in plfHb (hemolysis) due to exposure to mechanical stress from the suctioning process.
As the blood samples had different HCT values, and as mechanical hemolysis depends on HCT, the measured values of plfHb, including those in the baseline samples, were normalized to the standard HCT value of 40%. This normalization was justified by previous findings (13), which showed that, in the range of HCT values in our samples, there is a linear relationship between levels of mechanical hemolysis and concentration of RBCs. This procedure allowed for comparing blood damage among blood samples with HCT values that were significantly different (i.e., after dilution of blood 1:1 with saline). Normalization was performed with the following equation:
|
|
Finally, the percent of hemolysis was calculated using the formula
|
|
where wblHb = whole blood total Hb concentration in mg/dL.
Differences in hemolysis among samples were compared using a one-way analysis of variance with a Bonferronis multiple comparison test. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Correlation between the age of the blood and the resulting hemolysis was performed with Pearsons correlation test.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The results are presented after recalculation of plfHb to a standard HCT level (HCT = 40%) with the assumption that hemolysis is linearly proportional to the concentration of RBCs. As shown in Table 1, hemolysis was always significantly higher when blood was aspirated from the flat surface, regardless of the suction pressure. At a negative suction pressure of 300 mm Hg, dilution of blood with saline (1:1) reduced hemolysis by approximately 55% after suction from the beaker and by more than 60% after collection from the flat surface. Table 2 shows how the suctioning speeds differed based on suction pressure and suction site. As would be expected, 300 mm Hg suction pressure allowed for more rapid suctioning. However, the site of suction was more important: suctioning from a bowl was much more rapid than suctioning from a flat surface. A reduction of blood viscosity from saline dilution reduced the time of suction from both a beaker and the flat surface by approximately 60%.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mathematical modeling of cell salvage has revealed that small changes in RBC processing efficiency can make large differences in the maximum allowable blood loss that a patient can sustain before allogeneic transfusion therapy (14,15). These models suggest that a 70 kg patient with a starting HCT of 45% can sustain a blood loss of 9600 mL if a transfusion trigger of 21% is used and cell salvage captures 60% of lost RBCs. The sustainable blood loss increases to 13,750 mL if 70% RBC recovery is achieved. Thus, small changes in RBC recovery can result in large differences in the ability to avoid allogeneic transfusion.
In an attempt to maximize capture of RBCs, many cell salvage programs will minimize suction pressure applied to the RBCs when it is being removed from the surgical field. Decreasing the suction pressure decreases the shear forces applied to the RBCs, which in turn decreases hemolysis. In addition, surgical sponges are rinsed with saline before discard with the rinse solution being processed through the cell salvage cycle, resulting in capture of these RBCs. Regulation of suction pressure and rinsing of sponges are the only known techniques for maximizing efficiency of RBC recovery.
The visual appearance of the blood after high suction from the flat surface showed heavy amounts of frothing from aspirated air. Diluting blood with normal saline reduced the frothing and mechanical stress, resulting in an approximately 60% reduction in hemolysis. This suggests that hemolysis can be reduced in some surgical environments by instilling normal saline into the surgical field during suctioning. For example, spine surgery involves a small suction tip on a relatively flat, shallow surgical field. In these procedures, use of saline along with suctioning would facilitate RBC recovery. The same effect might be achievable by combining normovolemic hemodilution with cell salvage.
The highest physiological shear stress in the normal vasculature is about 10 N/m2 (16). The highest wall shear stresses applied to blood in our experiments were about 20 N/m2. This shear stress is significantly lower than those of 200300 N/m2 considered to be lethal for RBCs (17). This suggests that other factors are more important than the aspiration method in the RBC loss during blood salvage.
The bloodair interface may also contribute to increased hemolysis during filtration at the point of the collection, and the concentrating and washing processes. Sublethal RBC damage is analogous to "accelerated" RBC aging, and promotes early removal of the transfused RBCs from the vascular system (18). Our results confirm the previous work of Gregoretti, which showed that suction of air should be avoided to enhance RBC capture and return. The degree of hemolysis observed in both studies does not explain the large differences in capture rates obtained in Waters mathematical modeling (16). The reason for this could be a sublethal blood damage produced during the first stage of blood moving from a surgical site to its final mixing with saline before it is returned to a patient. Sublethal damage, which is not easy to identify, could significantly reduce RBC survival during washing and filtration. Minimizing suction pressure will decrease sublethal damage and increase the efficiency RBC salvage.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|