JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baumgarten, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baumgarten, R. K.

Anesth Analg 2007;104:1292
© 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000263240.89121.D0


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Section Editor:
Lawrence Saidman

The Real Ultrasound Revolution

Richard K. Baumgarten, MD

Department of Anesthesiology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, rkbaumgarten{at}comcast.net

To the Editor:

Our specialty’s fixation with ultrasound-guided nerve blocks may be distracting us from the real ultrasound revolution in medicine. Physicians in emergency medicine and critical care are using ultrasound extensively. Bedside ultrasound diagnosis should be incorporated into clinical anesthesia.

Ultrasound (U/S) allows real-time detection of cardiac tamponade, pneumothorax, severe hypovolemia, and pleural effusion (1,2). Rapid diagnosis of these conditions in the operating room or recovery could be life-saving. Cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation often responds to prompt electrical shock. Pulseless electrical activity (PEA) has a much poorer prognosis. Early U/S evaluation can detect potentially reversible causes of PEA in real time (3). The presence or absence of cardiac activity on U/S is highly predictive of the success of CPR (4). Fortunately, cardiac arrest is rare in the OR and recovery. When it does occur, prompt use of portable U/S may salvage an otherwise disastrous situation.

There is mounting evidence in the critical care literature that U/S can improve the safety and efficacy of internal jugular cannulation. Despite these evidence-based recommendations, anesthesiologists are reluctant to use U/S for line placement (5).

U/S also has mundane uses, which while not life-saving, could improve efficiency and patient satisfaction. Many emergency departments now use U/S for patients with difficult venous access (6). Anesthesiology has been slow to adopt this strategy, even though difficult IV access is a frequent cause of patient complaints. U/S can also speed the placement of radial artery catheters (7).

Evaluation of bladder volume is another potential use of U/S. Many ambulatory facilities require spontaneous urination before discharge. Patients can spend hours in recovery waiting to urinate. It is often difficult to determine whether delayed urination is due to impaired micturation from residual anesthesia or not enough urine in the bladder to trigger urination. Dedicated bladder volume instruments exist (e.g., BladderScan®), but they are quite expensive ({approx}$15,000). Newer bedside U/S machines can be used to assess bladder volume. The savings in recovery costs alone might justify the acquisition of portable U/S.

Intravenous fluid therapy ({approx}30 mL/kg) is effective for the prevention of PONV, especially in patients at high-risk for this problem (8,9). However, the possibility of bladder distension is of concern. Ready availability of U/S to measure bladder volume could make fluid loading a useful alternative to expensive pharmacologic antiemetics.

Many question the purchase of a $70,000 U/S machine for nerve blocks that have been done with a $600 nerve stimulator. A broader justification is needed. While the most common source of disaster in anesthesia is airway compromise, for other causes of precipitous deterioration in our patients, bedside U/S may be invaluable for rapid diagnosis and effective treatment. By helping us discharge patients more rapidly, U/S could produce significant cost savings. Emphasizing the myriad benefits of U/S may convince hospitals to provide high-quality, portable U/S for anesthesia departments. At the same time, we in anesthesia must master new U/S skills so that our specialty can join the ultrasound revolution.

REFERENCES

  1. Tang A, Euerle B. Emergency department ultrasound and echocardiography. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2005;23:1179–94.[ISI][Medline]
  2. Blaivas M, Lyon M, Duggal S. A prospective comparison of supine chest radiography and bedside ultrasound for the diagnosis of traumatic pneumothorax. Acad Emerg Med 2005;12:844–9.[ISI][Medline]
  3. Niendorff DF, Rassias AJ, Palac R, Beach ML, Costa S, Greenberg M. Rapid cardiac ultrasound of inpatients suffering PEA arrest performed by nonexpert sonographers. Resuscitation 2005;67:81–7.[ISI][Medline]
  4. Salen P, Melniker L, Chooljian C, Rose JS, Alteveer J, Reed J, Heller M. Does the presence or absence of sonographically identified cardiac activity predict resuscitation outcomes of cardiac arrest patients? Am J Emerg Med 2005;23:459–62.[ISI][Medline]
  5. Bailey PL, Glance LG, Eaton MP, Parshall B, McIntosh S. A survey of the use of ultrasound during central venous catheterization. Anesth Analg 2007;104:491–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Costantino TG, Parikh AK, Satz WA, Fojtik JP. Ultrasonography-guided peripheral intravenous access versus traditional approaches in patients with difficult intravenous access. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 46:456–61.[ISI][Medline]
  7. Shiver S, Blaivas M, Lyon M. A prospective comparison of ultrasound-guided and blindly placed radial arterial catheters. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13:1275–9.[ISI][Medline]
  8. Goodarzi M, Matar MM, Shafa M, Townsend JE, Gonzalez I. A prospective randomized blinded study of the effect of intravenous fluid therapy on postoperative nausea and vomiting in children undergoing strabismus surgery. Paediatr Anaesth 2006;16:49–53.[Medline]
  9. Maharaj CH, Kallam SR, Malik A, Hassett P, Grady D, Laffey JG. Preoperative intravenous fluid therapy decreases postoperative nausea and pain in high risk patients. Anesth Analg 2005;100:675–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C. Barker, P. Jefferson, and D. R. Ball
Portable Ultrasound to Diagnose True Radial Artery Aneurysm
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2007; 105(3): 890 - 891.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. K. Harrison, T. Manser, S. K. Howard, and D. M. Gaba
Cognitive Aids in a Simulated Anesthetic Crisis
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2007; 104(5): 1293 - 1293.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baumgarten, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baumgarten, R. K.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press