JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Milnes, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Milnes, A.

Anesth Analg 2007;104:1294
© 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000260356.82964.8b


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Section Editor:
Lawrence Saidman

Drug–Drug Interaction or a Local Anesthetic Overdose?

Alan Milnes, DDS, PhD, FRCD(C)

Kelowna, BC, Canada, angelmanguel{at}shaw.ca

To the Editor:

The case report by Marcucci et al. (1) elegantly describes cyotchrome P450 enzymes and their role in metabolizing various drugs significant in the practice of anesthesia. However, I believe they have concluded falsely that drug–drug interactions were primarily responsible for the cardiac arrest they reported. The patient in question clearly received an overdose of mepivacaine, which most likely accounted for cardiac depression and arrest. The maximum recommended dose (MRD) of mepivacaine in the adult is 400 mg (2). The patient on whom they reported received a total dose of 675 mg, 169% of the MRD administered in one bolus. In addition, although 15 µm of epinephrine was injected coincidentally, it is unlikely that this small amount of vascoconstrictor would counteract the potent vasodilating capabilities of mepivacaine. Hence, rapid uptake of an overdose of local anesthetic, rather than delayed metabolism as a result of drug interactions with P450 enzymes, was probably responsible for "causing unexpectedly high blood levels" of mepivacaine. However, it is notable that none of the panel detected the administration of an overdose of local anesthetic.

REFERENCES

  1. Marcucci C, Sandson N, Thorn E, Bourke D. Unrecognized drug–drug interactions: a cause of intraoperative cardiac arrest? Anesth Analg 2006;102:1569–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Saliras F, Liu S, Scholz A. Analgesics: ion channel ligands/sodium channel blockers/ local anesthetics. In: Evers A, Maze M, eds. Anesthetic pharmacology: physiologic principles and clinical practice. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone, 2004:507–38.




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Milnes, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Milnes, A.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2007 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press