JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pranevicius, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pranevicius, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pranevicius, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pranevicius, O.

Anesth Analg 2007;104:1308
© 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000260560.05779.fd


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Section Editor:
Lawrence Saidman

Using Two Needles for Multiple Injection Nerve Blocks Avoids Manipulation After Local Anesthetic Injection

Mindaugas Pranevicius, MD, Jung K. Park, MD, Elliot Cowart, CRNA, Leonard Golden, MD, Algirdas Rucinskas, MD, and Osvaldas Pranevicius, MD, PhD

Department of Anesthesiology, Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY, pranevicius{at}gmail.com (M. Pranevicius, Park, Cowart, Golden) Clinic of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care of Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania (Rucinskas) New York Hospital Queens Weill Medical College of Cornell Universitym New York, NY (O. Pranevicius)

To the Editor:

Metaanalysis of 12 randomized, controlled trials suggests that nerve blocks using multiple injections have a greater success rate than do single-injection techniques (1). They also have a more rapid onset time and require less local anesthetic (2–5).

However, after the initial local anesthetic injection, motor, and paresthesia responses gradually diminish and some fear unintentional injury to the anesthetized nerve while redirecting the needle (6).

To eliminate this risk we propose using two separate needles rather than redirecting the needle during multiple injection nerve blocks. Local anesthetic is not injected until both needles are placed into their final position.

We used a two-needle approach for posterior intertendinous popliteal nerve block (7). The first needle is inserted in the sagittal plane at the middle of the popliteal fossa 9 cm above the popliteal crease and the needle is "walked" laterally until a tibial (plantar flexion) or peroneal (dorsiflexion) response is obtained. The second needle is inserted 2 cm distally along the course of the nerve (Fig. 1). If the first response obtained is that from the tibial nerve, the second needle is aimed laterally to obtain a peroneal nerve response. After stimulation has reconfirmed proper location of the first needle, local anesthetic is injected through both needles after negative aspiration. Saphenous or femoral block may be required for the tourniquet pain or surgery in the dorsum of the foot.

With ultrasound guidance local anesthetic spread can be seen and the needle is redirected to obtain circumneural deposition (8). However nerve stimulation is the most common neurolocation technique.

The two-needle technique retains the advantages of multiple injection nerve blocks, with the only drawback being the cost of an additional needle and the need for a second skin puncture. It eliminates theoretical safety concerns related to multiple injection nerve blocks and may increase their use in regional anesthesia.

REFERENCES

  1. Handoll HH, Koscielniak-Nielsen ZJ. Single, double or multiple injection techniques for axillary brachial plexus block for hand, wrist or forearm surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; 25:CD003842.
  2. Casati A, Fanelli G, Beccaria P, et al. The effects of single or multiple injections on the volume of 0.5% ropivacaine required for femoral nerve blockade. Anesth Analg 2001;93:183–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Inberg P, Annila I, Annila P. Double-injection method using peripheral nerve stimulator is superior to single injection in axillary plexus block. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1999;24:509–13.[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Lavoie J, Martin R, Tetrault JP, et al. Axillary plexus block using a peripheral nerve stimulator: single or multiple injections. Can J Anaesth 1992;39:583–6.[Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Bailey SL, Parkinson SK, Little WL, Simmerman SR. Sciatic nerve block. A comparison of single versus double injection technique. Reg Anesth 1994;19:9–13.[Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Neuburger M, Gultlinger O, Ass B, Buttner J, Kaiser H. Influence of blockades with local anesthetics on the stimulation ability of a nerve by peripheral nerve stimulation. Results of a randomized study. Anaesthesist 2005;54:575–7. In German.[Medline]
  7. Hadzic A, Vloka JD, Singson R, et al. A comparison of intertendinous and classical approaches to popliteal nerve block using magnetic resonance imaging simulation. Anesth Analg 2002;94:1321–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Marhofer P, Greber M, Kapral S. Ultrasound guidance in regional anesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2005;94:7–17.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pranevicius, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pranevicius, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pranevicius, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pranevicius, O.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press