JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farooq, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Farooq, M.

Anesth Analg 2007;104:1614
© 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000263290.32283.4c


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Section Editor:
Lawrence Saidman

Can Electrocardiogram-Controlled Central Line Placement Decrease the Need for Routine Chest Radiographs After Central Venous Cannulation?

Muhammad Farooq, FCPS, FCARCSI, DICM

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care; Adelaide and Meath National Children Hospital; Dublin, Ireland; muhammadfarooqch{at}yahoo.com

To the Editor:

I have two questions regarding the recent article by Gebhard et al. (1) describing the use of electrocardiographic guidance in accurately positioning central venous catheters. First, and because of concern related to the cost of infections associated with central venous cannulation, how is sterility maintained when the connection between the guide wire and the ECG adaptor is established (2)?

Second, if one of the results of this study is to decrease the requirement for an radiograph in order to confirm proper positioning of the CVC, how are the other serious complications such as pneumothorax or hydrothorax, the treatment for which is far more costly than $120.00, ruled out?

REFERENCES

  1. Gebhard RE, Szmuk P, Pivalizza EG, et al. The accuracy of electrocardiogram-controlled central line placement. Anesth Analg 2007;104:65–70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Dellinger EP, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravenous catheter -related infections. MMWR Recomm Rep 2002;51(RR-10):1–29.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
R. E. Gebhard
Can Electrocardiogram-Controlled Central Line Placement Decrease the Need for Routine Chest Radiographs After Central Venous Cannulation?
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2007; 104(6): 1614 - 1615.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farooq, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Farooq, M.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2007 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press