JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cascio, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sonner, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cascio, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sonner, J. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mechanisms
Right arrow Genetics
Right arrow Pharmacology

Anesth Analg 2007;105:381-385
© 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000261277.65343.4e


ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY

Mouse Chromosome 7 Harbors a Quantitative Trait Locus for Isoflurane Minimum Alveolar Concentration

Michael Cascio, BS*, Yilei Xing, MD*, Diane Gong, PharmD{dagger}, John Popovich, BS*, Edmond I. Eger, II, MD*, Saunak Sen, PhD{ddagger}, Gary Peltz, MD, PhD§, and James M. Sonner, MD*

From the *Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, CA; {dagger}The Waggoner Center for Alcohol and Addiction Research, University of Texas, Austin; {ddagger}Department of Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA; and §Department of Genetics and Genomics, Roche Palo Alto, Palo Alto, CA.

Address correspondence to Dr. Sonner, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, S-455i, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0464. Address e-mail to sonnerj{at}anesthesia.ucsf.edu.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
BACKGROUND: The minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of isoflurane is a quantitative trait because it varies continuously in a population. The location on the genome of genes or other genetic elements controlling quantiative traits is called quantitative trait loci (QTLs). In this study we sought to detect a quantitative trait locus underlying isoflurane MAC in mice.

METHODS: To accomplish this, two inbred mouse strains differing in isoflurane MAC, the C57BL/6J and LP/J mouse strains, were bred through two generations to produce genetic recombination. These animals were genotyped for microsatellite markers. We also applied an independent, computational method for identifying QTL-regulating differences in isoflurane MAC. In this approach, the isoflurane MAC was measured in a panel of 19 inbred strains, and computationally searched for genomic intervals where the pattern of genetic variation, based on single nucleotide polymorphisms, correlated with the differences in isoflurane MAC among inbred strains.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Both methods of genetic analysis identified a QTL for isoflurane MAC that was located on the proximal part of mouse chromosome 7.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Most traits are not inherited as discrete Mendelian traits, but rather vary continuously in a population. The minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of an inhaled anesthetic producing immobility in 50% of the population is such a trait. Multiple genes govern inheritance of quantitative traits. The location on the genome of genes or other genetic elements controlling quantitative traits are called quantitative trait loci (QTLs) (1).

The goal of this study was to detect a QTL underlying the difference in MAC between two inbred mouse strains. QTLs can be detected and mapped using linkage analysis, which tests the cosegregation of the trait of interest (MAC, in this case) and a genetic marker locus of known position on a chromosome (2). We used microsatellites (3) as our genetic markers. Microsatellites are repeats of short sequences. They are valuable for mapping purposes because they are plentiful, polymorphic, codominant, presumably neutral with respect to most traits and reproductive fitness, and easily typed via the polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

MAC is easily measured in inbred mouse strains. We have reported the variation in MAC for three conventional inhaled anesthetics, including isoflurane, among 15 inbred mouse strains (4). At the time of that investigation, genetic maps were available for nine of these inbred strains (5). To identify genetic regions responsible for differences between strains in isoflurane MAC, we prepared backcross progeny from two inbred strains, C57BL/6J and LP/J, that had significant differences in isoflurane MAC (mean MAC ± sd was 1.46% ± 0.06% atmospheres for C57BL/6J (n = 24 mice), and 1.74% ± 0.06% atmospheres for LP/J (n = 24 mice) (4).

By breeding female C57BL/6J mice with male LP/J mice, we generated F1 mice, and then backcrossed F1 male mice to female C57BL/6J mice to produce a set of 90 BC1 (first backcross generation) mice for analysis. The isoflurane MAC was measured in the BC1 mice, and offspring with higher or lower MACs were genotyped for a panel of microsatellite markers to identify QTL regulating the difference in isoflurance MAC. In addition to this experimental backcross, we also used a computational (in silico) method for genetic mapping (6). In this approach, the isoflurane MAC was measured in a panel of 19 inbred strains, and computationally searched for genomic intervals where the pattern of genetic variation based on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) correlated with the differences in isoflurane MAC among inbred strains (6). Both methods of genetic analysis identified a QTL for isoflurane MAC that was located on the proximal part of mouse chromosome 7.


    METHODS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of CA, San Francisco, approved these studies. Mice were maintained on a 12:12 h light–dark cycle and had mouse chow and water available ad libitum. They were studied at 8–12-wk of age.

Isoflurane MAC was measured in 19 strains of mice, using previously published methods (4).

Female C57BL/6J and male LP/J mice (Jackson Labs, Bar Harbor, ME) were bred together to produce F1 offspring. F1 males were then backcrossed to female C57BL/6J mice. MAC to isoflurane was measured in triplicate in 90 backcross progeny, and one time in F1s and the parental (LP/J and C57BL/6J) mice (Fig. 1). At least 1 wk separated each MAC determination in a given mouse.


Figure 118
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. The frequency distribution of isoflurane minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) (in percent atmospheres) for F1 mice (upper left panel), LP/J mice (upper right panel), C57BL/6J mice (lower right panel), and BC1 mice (first backcross generation; lower left panel).

 

The 20 mice with the highest and the 20 with the lowest mean isoflurane MACs were chosen for genotyping. DNA was extracted from mouse livers using Invitrogen's Easy DNA kit (Carlsbad, CA).

Table 1 lists the microsatellites chosen for genotyping (for primer sequences, see: http://informatics.jax.org/javawi2/servlet/WIFetch?page=markerQF). The choice of microsatellites was based on the distribution of the markers throughout the mouse genome and their presumed ease of genotyping (i.e., the markers had to differ by at least two base pairs in the C57BL/6J and LP/J strains). PCR genotyping was performed using primers purchased from Research Genetics (now Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Tfl DNA polymerase (from the thermophilic bacterium Thermus flavus), enhancer, buffers, and dNTPs were purchased from Epicenter (Madison, WI). Reactions used 1.20 µL MgCl2, 1.50 µL enhancer with betaine, 0.75 µL PCR buffer, 0.38 µL dNTPs, 0.30 µL Tfl polymerase (concentration 1 U/µL), 0.45 µL forward primer (concentration 6 µM), 0.45 µL reverse primer (concentration 6 µM), 6.00 µL water, and 4 µL genomic DNA. We used a touchdown PCR method in which cycles of annealing and extension were started above the calculated annealing temperature (7), to minimize nonspecific priming. The thermal cycler protocol (using a MJR model PC100 thermal cycler) started at 94°C for 2 min followed by two cycles of annealing and extension at a temperature 8°C above the calculated annealing temperature for the primer pair. The annealing temperature was then decreased by 1 degree and two PCR cycles performed at this lower temperature. This was continued until the annealing temperature was 5°C below the calculated annealing temperature for the primer pair, at which point 30 PCR cycles were performed to amplify the microsatellite.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Microsatellite Markers Used for Genotyping

 

PCR genotyping products varied in length from 96 to 346 bp. The C57BL/6J and LP/J microsatellites differed by 2–66 bp, but primers were typically chosen where possible to produce products that differed by 10–20 bp, to improve the ease of distinguishing C57BL/6J from LP/J microsatellites. To resolve DNA sequences as small as 2 bp, PCR products were run on 3.5% MetaPhor agarose (Fisher Scientific) gels in TBE buffer, then stained with ethidium bromide for visualization. The genotype of the microsatellite marker in question was determined to be homozygous for C57BL/6J if only one band was present by electrophoresis at the expected mobility, which was inferred by comparison with molecular weight markers and PCR products from C57BL/6J genomic DNA. The genotype of the mouse was heterozygous at a given marker if two bands (i.e., one for C57BL/6J and one for LP/J) were present. Replicate samples were run as needed to resolve ambiguity in genotyping.

A statistical analysis was used to correlate microsatellites with MAC values. The identification of statistically significant correlations indicates that the chromosome regions associated with those microsatellites harbor genes that explain some of the variation in MAC. In this study, QTLs were mapped in the experimental backcross using the statistical methods of Sen and Churchill (8). Significance was determined by a permutation test with 1000 permutations. A permutation test (9) is an empirical method, based on the experimental data, for estimating threshold LOD values for QTL studies (LOD values are the log base 10 of the odds, which is commonly used in genetics to estimate linkage of two loci). With the permutation test, MAC values are randomly assigned to the genotypes for each mouse. Then the LOD score is calculated. This process is repeated with a new, random assignment of MAC values to genotypes each time. The random assignment assures that there is no association between MAC values and genotypes. In the end, the distribution of the LOD score under the null hypothesis that there is no association between MAC and genotype is obtained. LOD scores more extreme than the 950th highest score are at or above the genome-wide 5% threshold. Those above the 990th highest score are at or above the genome-wide 1% threshold.

QTLs were mapped in silico using the strain MACs by previously described methods (6). The linkage prediction program which implemented this method scanned the SNP database and correlated the genetic distance (from SNPs) between strain pairs with MAC distances between strains, thereby identifying SNP markers linked to strain differences in MAC.


    RESULTS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Isoflurane MAC values for the 19 strains studied are shown in Table 2. MAC value distributions for the C57BL/6J, LP/J, F1, and BC1 backcross mice are shown in Figure 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Isoflurane MAC for 19 Inbred Mouse Strains

 

Genotyping the 20 backcross mice with higher isoflurane MACs and the 20 with lower MACs yielded three loci with a LOD scores exceeding 1 on chromosomes 4, 7, and 9. The highest LOD score was 1.7 for marker D7MIT246 at 15.0 cM on chromosome 7, which corresponds to a genome position of 30.0 Mb in NCBI mouse build 36 coordinates. In this study, the genome-wide 5% threshold was 1.34 and the 1% threshold was 1.64. The chromosome 7 QTL is statistically significant, with P < 0.01. It should be emphasized that this is the genome-wide Type I error rate corrected for genome-wide multiple comparisons. Based on this significance cutoff, the peaks on chromosome 9 and 4 were not significant.

The chromosome 7 microsatellite marker linked to the QTL in the C57BL/6J (i.e., lower MAC) strain segregated in the backcross offspring with higher MACs, while the markers for the LP/J (higher MAC strain) segregated in the backcross progeny with lower MACs.

A second, independent approach was used to identify chromosomal regions affecting isoflurane MAC in mice. The measured isoflurane MAC for 19 strains was used for computational genetic analysis. A QTL for isoflurane spanning a region from approximately 10 to 50 Mb on mouse chromosome 7 was identified, which was highly significant (the z score = number of standard deviation was 6.76, calculated from SNP allele frequencies). Of note, this computationally identified region encompasses the marker identified through analysis of the backcross progeny.


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
After previously screening inbred mouse strains to find animals which differed in isoflurane MAC (4), we applied two independent methods to identify QTLs responsible for the difference in MAC in these strains. In the first method, we performed an experimental backcross in which we bred animals from two strains which differed in MAC (C57BL/6J and LP/J) through two generations. We did this to produce a genetically unique population. This could not be accomplished by analyzing the parental or F1 animals, because the parental animals were inbred. As a result, all C57BL/6J mice are genetically identical, all LP/J mice are genetically identical, and all F1 mice are genetically identical by virtue of having one of each chromosome from the C57BL/6J mother and one from the LP/J father in each pair of chromosomes. To produce a genetically unique population segregating microsatellite markers and QTLs underlying MAC, the F1 mice had to be bred through one further generation. This produced genetic recombination between the maternal and paternal chromosomes in the F1 mice during meiosis. Thus each chromosome passed on to its progeny by F1 mice was a patchwork of C57BL6/J and LP/J DNA.

This produced the genetically diverse population that was required. We measured MAC in these offspring, and genotyped the offspring with extreme MAC values. Using statistical methods to identify the association of MAC with molecular markers, we identified a QTL on the proximal part of chromosome 7 influencing the difference in MAC in the parental strains.

In the second method, we measured MAC in 19 inbred strains for which dense SNP maps had been made. Using a computational method, we correlated the MAC difference between strains with the SNP maps. This detected the same QTL on chromosome 7 as the experimental backcross and gave an approximate map position for the QTL.

Genes identified as important to anesthesia in mice are likely to be important to anesthesia in humans because there is a high degree of homology between the genes of mice and humans. This, together with the fact that large numbers of mice can be bred and studied, provides a powerful rationale for using mice as a model system in studies of anesthetic mechanisms. However, to our knowledge, all studies of MAC in mice have used reverse genetic approaches, in which the function of a candidate gene is altered, a genetically modified animal is made, and the effect on the phenotype of interest (e.g., MAC) is evaluated (10). In this study, we chose to use a different but complementary forward genetic approach: the analysis of natural variation via QTL methods. All forward genetic methods start with the phenotype, rather than a candidate gene, to identify the genetic basis for observed phenotypic differences. In contrast to genetic approaches in which mutations are made, the QTL approach deals with the entire system as it occurs in nature. It is an intrinsically multivariate method which analyzes the effect of many genes, albeit with smaller effects than those which are usually genetically engineered into mice. Those genes are, however, the ones which are actually involved in producing the phenotype in nature.

Our primary goal in identifying QTLs for isoflurane MAC is to aid in finding genes responsible for the immobilizing effect of isoflurane. Typically, many genes are located in QTLs; consequently, locating the gene or genes responsible for the quantitative variation described by the QTL can be difficult. The chromosome 7 QTL we have identified contains many genes which might plausibly mediate the effects of isoflurane. They include a variety of ion channels, which are often considered the mediators of inhaled anesthetic action. Whether one of these, or a gene that does not code for an ion channel, or some other genetic element underlies our QTL, is the focus of continuing investigation.

Of interest, the chromosome 7 QTL we identified shows dominance in the opposite direction from that expected. That is, the QTL from the lower MAC strain (C57BL/6J) appears in the BC1 progeny with the higher MACs, and the QTL from the higher MAC strain (LP/J) appears in the BC1 progeny with the lower MACs. This is not an uncommon observation in QTL studies. It occurs because the dominance predicted from the F1 phenotype is the sum total dominance of all genes acting together. That is, the F1 phenotype resembles that of the LP/J parent, and thus the QTL from the LP/J parent might be expected to be present in the BC1 progeny with the higher MACs. However, the MAC of these progeny is the result of all QTLs acting together, not simply the chromosome 7 QTL. The observation that the chromosome 7 QTL from the LP/J parent is present in the BC1 mice with lower MACs is of note because it indicates the presence of other QTLs with counterbalancing effects.

This is the first QTL study examining MAC for an inhaled anesthetic. Other studies examining loss of righting reflex for various anesthetics have been conducted. It is of interest that QTLs on chromosome 7 have been identified in several of these studies. For instance, a strong QTL for propofol sensitivity, assessed using duration of loss of righting reflex in long sleep and short sleep mice, is located between 71.4 and 89.7 Mb on chromosome 7 (approximately 44 cM on the genetic map). (11) QTLs linked to this same locus, again using latency to loss of the righting reflex in long sleep and short sleep mice, have been identified for sensitivity to alcohol (12) and chloral hydrate (13). Given the map position, and the observation that isoflurane righting reflex does not differ in these mice (14), this probably represents a different QTL than that found here. A QTL at 29.0 cM on chromosome 7 was found using latency to loss of righting reflex to 4% ether in a backcross of C57BL/6J amd MSM/Ms mice (15). The gene underlying this QTL may possibly be the same as ours.

Our experimental plan of attack for identifying genes underlying QTLs will use methods that have been successfully applied for many traits (16–20). Now that a QTL has been identified, the next step is to analyze more backcross or intercross progeny to map the QTL to a manageable interval on chromosome 7. This will reduce the number of candidate genes in the QTL; in addition, it will probably lead to the identification of QTLs on other chromosomes. The number of candidate genes can be restricted further by determining which genes in the QTL are expressed in the central nervous system. Since isoflurane MAC is predominantly mediated by the spinal cord (21), analysis of gene expression in the spinal cord is probably the preferred approach. This analysis may reveal that differential expression of a gene is the basis for the QTL. Alternately, there may be a qualitative difference in the function of genes in the LP/J and C57BL6/J strains which influences isoflurane MAC in the BC1 mice. This may initially be revealed as coding sequence differences between the strains, requiring confirmation by functional evaluation of the product of the candidate gene. Finally, new computational methods, based on haplotype mapping (22) combined with detailed SNP maps, hold the promise of identification of genes underlying QTLs based on the association of isoflurane MAC and haplotypes, provided that SNP maps and MAC are determined in a large enough number of strains.

In summary, we report the identification of a QTL for isoflurane MAC on the proximal part of mouse chromosome 7 using an experimental backcross in C57BL/6J and LP/J mouse strains, and independently using an in silico method.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
Dr. Sonner acknowledges the advice of Dr. John Belknap on study design and of Dr. Susan Bergeson on genotyping.


    Footnotes
 
Accepted for publication February 5, 2007.

This work was supported in part by a grant from the UCSF Academic Senate (to JMS) and by NIGMS P01 GM47818 (to EIE and JMS) and R01 GM069379 (to JMS).

Dr. Eger is a paid consultant to Baxter Healthcare Corp.

Reprints will not be available from the author.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Falconer D, Mackay T. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th ed. Harlow, England: Pearson Prentice Hall, 1996
  2. Lynch M, Walsh B. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc., 1998
  3. Gibson G, Muse S. A primer of genome science. 2nd ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc., 2004
  4. Sonner JM, Gong D, Eger EI II. Naturally occurring variability in anesthetic potency among inbred mouse strains. Anesth Analg 2000;91:720–6[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Dietrich WF, Miller J, Steen R, Merchant MA, Damron-Boles D, Husain Z, Dredge R, Daly MJ, Ingalis KA, O'Connor TJ. A comprehensive genetic map of the mouse genome. Nature 1996;380:149–52[Medline]
  6. Grupe A, Germer S, Usuka J, Aud D, Belknap JK, Klein RF, Ahluwalia MK, Higuchi R, Peltz G. In silico mapping of complex disease-related traits in mice. Science 2001;292:1915–8[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Don RH, Cox PT, Wainwright BJ, Baker K, Mattick JS. 'Touchdown' PCR to circumvent spurious priming during gene amplification. Nucleic Acids Res 1991;19:4008[Free Full Text]
  8. Sen S, Churchill G. A statistical framework for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 2001;159:371–87[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Churchill GA, Doerge RW. Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 1994;138:963–71[Abstract]
  10. Sonner JM, Antognini JF, Dutton RC, Flood P, Gray AT, Harris RA, Homanics GE, Kendig J, Orser B, Raines DE, Rampil IJ, Trudell J, Vissel B, Eger EI II. Inhaled anesthetics and immobility: mechanisms, mysteries, and minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration. Anesth Analg 2003;97:718–40[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Simpson VJ, Rikke BA, Costello JM, Corley R, Johnson TE. Identification of a genetic region in mice that specifies sensitivity to propofol. Anesthesiology 1998;88:379–89[ISI][Medline]
  12. Markel PD, Fulker DW, Bennett B, Corley RP, DeFries JC, Erwin VG, Johnson TE. Quantitative trait loci for ethanol sensitivity in the LS x SS recombinant inbred strains: interval mapping. Behav Genet 1996;26:447–58[ISI][Medline]
  13. Christensen SC, Johnson TE, Markel PD, Clark VJ, Fulker DW, Corley RP, Collins AC, Wehner JM. Quantitative trait locus analyses of sleep-times induced by sedative-hypnotics in LSXSS recombinant inbred strains of mice. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1996;20:543–50[ISI][Medline]
  14. Koblin DD, Deady JE. Anaesthetic requirement in mice selectively bred for differences in ethanol sensitivity. Br J Anaesth 1981;53:5–10[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Megumi T, Song CW, Park YG, Tanaka Y, Uchida I, Okumoto M. Mapping of putative ether-anesthesia resistance gene using C57BL/6J and MSM/Ms mouse strains. J Anesth 2004;18:267–76[Medline]
  16. Korstanje R, Paigen B. From QTL to gene: the harvest begins. Nat Genet 2002;31:235–6[ISI][Medline]
  17. Yalcin B, Willis-Owen SA, Fullerton J, Meesaq A, Deacon RM, Rawlins JN, Copley RR, Morris AP, Flint J, Mott R. Genetic dissection of a behavioral quantitative trait locus shows that Rgs2 modulates anxiety in mice. Nat Genet 2004;36:1197–202[ISI][Medline]
  18. Liao G, Wang J, Guo J, Allard J, Cheng J, Ng A, Shafer S, Puech A, McPherson JD, Foernzler D, Peltz G, Usuka J. In silico genetics: identification of a functional element regulating H2-E{alpha} gene expression. Science 2004;306:690–5[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Klein RF, Allard J, Avnur Z, Nikolcheva T, Rotstein D, Carlos AS, Shea M, Waters RV, Belknap JK, Peltz G, Orwoll ES. Regulation of bone mass in mice by the lipoxygenase gene Alox15. Science 2004;303:229–32[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Karp CL, Grupe A, Schadt E, Ewart SL, Keane-Moore M, Cuomo PJ, Kohl J, Wahl L, Kuperman D, Germer S, Aud D, Peltz G, Wills-Karp M. Identification of complement factor 5 as a susceptibility locus for experimental allergic asthma. Nat Immunol 2000;1:221–6[ISI][Medline]
  21. Antognini JF, Schwartz K. Exaggerated anesthetic requirements in the preferentially anesthetized brain. Anesthesiology 1993; 79:1244–9[ISI][Medline]
  22. Wang J, Liao G, Usuka J, Peltz G. Computational genetics: from mouse to human? Trends Genet 2005;21:526–32[ISI][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cascio, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sonner, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cascio, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sonner, J. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mechanisms
Right arrow Genetics
Right arrow Pharmacology


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press