JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ishikawa, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ishikawa, S.

Anesth Analg 2007;105:541-542
© 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000267253.05645.3a


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Section Editor:
Lawrence Saidman

There Are More Important Risk Factors That May Influence The Outcome in Female AVR Patients

Seiji Ishikawa, MD

Department of Anesthesiology; Tokyo Medical and Dental University; Graduate School of Medicine; Tokyo, Japan; ishikawa.mane{at}tmd.ac.jp

To the Editor:

Although a recent paper (1) describing the impact of gender on mortality and morbidity after aortic valve replacement (AVR) led to the conclusion that there was no greater than a 2.5-fold increase in risk for females compared with males using 1:1 matching by propensity score I suggest that the important additional risk factors should be taken into consideration to determine the impact of gender on outcome.

First, the severity of aortic diseases was not compared between females and males. As the authors stated in the Discussion section, female patients with aortic stenosis develop greater left ventricular wall thickness (2). Thus, it is not surprising that myocardial preservation during cardiopulmonary bypass may be suboptimal in female patients with severe aortic stenosis. Second, as perioperative factors, agents that potentially have cardioprotective effects [e.g., ß-blockers (3,4), nicorandil (5)] may have influenced the cardiac morbidity after AVR. Regarding general anesthetics, sevoflurane has been shown to have a better cardioprotective effect compared with propofol (6).

Third, there is a possibility that race is a significant predictor of some complications after isolated AVR. Taylor et al. (7) recently reported that black race was associated with an increased risk of prolonged ventilation, postoperative stay >14 days, and reoperation for bleeding after AVR.

Lastly, it may be more technically difficult for surgeons to perform AVR in female patients than in male patients. Female gender is known as one of the independent risk factors for permanent pacemaker implantation after AVR (8). Placement of sutures after extensive debridement of valve leaflets may have damaged the conduction system. I hope quantitative scoring will be performed by surgeons regarding technical difficulties in future studies.

The greater the number of important risk factors included for matching female and male pairs, the closer we will come to the conclusion that there is no gender-related risk regarding isolated AVR surgery.

REFERENCES

  1. Duncan AI, Lin J, Koch CG, Gillinov AM, Xu M, Starr NJ. The impact of gender on in-hospital mortality and morbidity after isolated aortic valve replacement. Anesth Analg 2006;103:800–8[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Rohde LE, Zhi G, Aranki SF, Beckel NE, Lee RT, Reimold SC. Gender-associated differences in left ventricular geometry in patients with aortic valve disease and effect of distinct overload subsets. Am J Cardiol 1997;80:475–80[Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Mangano DT, Layug EL, Wallace A, Tateo I. Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. Effect of atenolol on mortality and cardiovascular morbidity after noncardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1713–20[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Poldermans D, Boersma E, Bax JJ, Thomson IR, van de Ven LL, Blankensteijn JD, Baars HF, Yo TI, Trocino G, Vigna C, Roelandt JR, van Urk H. Dutch Echocardiographic Cardiac Risk Evaluation Applying Stress Echocardiography Study Group. The effect of bisoprolol on perioperative mortality and myocardial infarction in high-risk patients undergoing vascular surgery. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1789–94[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Kaneko T, Saito Y, Hikawa Y, Yasuda K, Makita K. Dose-dependent prophylactic effect of nicorandil, an ATP-sensitive potassium channel opener, on intra-operative myocardial ischaemia in patients undergoing major adnominal surgery. Br J Anaesth 2001;86:332–7[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. De Hert SG, ten Broecke PW, Mertens E, Van Sommeren EW, De Blier IG, Stockman BA, Rodrigus IE. Sevoflurane but not propofol preserves myocardial function in coronary surgery patients. Anesthesiology 2002;97:42–9[Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Taylor NE, O’Brien S, Edwards FH, Peterson ED, Bridges CR. Relation between race and mortality and morbidity after valve replacement surgery. Circulation 2005;111:1305–12[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Erdogan HB, Kayalar N, Ardal H, Omeroglu SN, Kirali K, Guler M, Akinci E, Yakut C. Risk factors for requirement of permanent pacemaker implantation after aortic valve replacement. J Card Surg 2006;21:211–5[Web of Science][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Duncan and C. Koch
There Are More Important Risk Factors That May Influence The Outcome in Female AVR Patients
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2007; 105(2): 542 - 542.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ishikawa, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ishikawa, S.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2007 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press