JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fowler, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fowler, S. J.

Anesth Analg 2007;105:880-881
© 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000270269.30730.e1


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Section Editor:
Lawrence Saidman

Risk of a Severe Neurological Complication After Regional Anesthesia Should Be Individualized

Steven J. Fowler, FCARCSI, FANZCA

Department of Anaesthesia Medicine; The Alfred Hospital; Melbourne, Victoria; Australia; steven.fowler{at}alfred.org.au

To the Editor:

Brull et al. (1) attempt to report a single rate for neurological complications after central neuraxial blockade and peripheral nerve blockade and conclude that permanent deficits are rare.

Variable definitions, heterogeneity, and underreporting do certainly make it difficult to estimate incidence confidently. However, providing a rate for "neurological complications" and "permanent injury" without including cases of epidural hematoma and abscess (which are important, direct, and severe complications of central neuraxial blockade) may cause confusion. Also, no single incidence figure can be provided because the risk of a severe complication may differ up to 100-fold between patients at low risk (i.e., the obstetric population) (2,3) and those with multiple "red flags" for a serious complication of central neuraxial blockade, such as older age, female sex, degenerative spinal disorder, and concurrent anticoagulant treatment, a common scenario in the population undergoing total joint replacement (4). Data from the ASA Closed Claims database support the impression that significant deficits are much less likely in the obstetric population (5).

In Moen et al.'s (6) study, a severe neurologic complication (from all causes) occurred after 1:3600 epidural procedures and 1:20,000 spinal blocks in the general population, but the rate was greater in women undergoing total knee arthroplasty who had epidurals (1:1800) and lower in obstetric patients (1:25,000). We have found this a useful guide when considering risk-benefit of central neuraxial blockade on a patient-by-patient basis (7). Temporary neuropathy (e.g., <12 wk) is of questionable significance in a discussion of material risk during the patient consent process, especially if sensory only. Further data are keenly awaited, especially regarding rate of neurological injury after peripheral nerve blockade, using single-shot versus continuous-catheter techniques.

REFERENCES

  1. Brull R, McCartney CJ, Chan VW, El-Beheiry H. Neurological complications after regional anesthesia: contemporary estimates of risk. Anesth Analg 2007;104:965–74[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Scott DB, Hibbard BM. Serious non-fatal complications associated with extradural block in obstetric practice. Br J Anaesth 1990;64:537–41[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Palot M, Visseaux H, Botmans C, Pire JC. [Epidemiology of complications of obstetrical epidural analgesia]. Cahiers d'anesthesiologie 1994;42:229–33
  4. Schroeder DR. Statistics: detecting a rare adverse drug reaction using spontaneous reports. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1998;23:183–9[Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Lee LA, Posner KL, Domino KB, Caplan RA, Cheney FW. Injuries associated with regional anesthesia in the 1980s and 1990s: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 2004;101:143–52[Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Moen V, Dahlgren N, Irestedt L. Severe neurological complications after central neuraxial blockade in Sweden 1990–1999. Anesthesiology 2004;101:950–9[Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Sage D, Fowler SJ. Major neurologic injury following regional anesthesia. In: Finucane BT, ed. Complications of regional anesthesia. 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 2007:333–53



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
R. Brull, C. J.L. McCartney, V. W.S. Chan, and H. El-Beheiry
Risk of a Severe Neurological Complication After Regional Anesthesia Should Be Individualized
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2007; 105(3): 881 - 881.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fowler, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fowler, S. J.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2007 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press