JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Anesth Analg 2007; 105:1042-1047
© 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000281927.88935.e0
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kimberger, O.
Right arrow Articles by Lenhardt, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kimberger, O.
Right arrow Articles by Lenhardt, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Critical Care
Right arrow Equipment
Right arrow Monitoring (Non-cardiac)
Right arrow Technology

TECHNOLOGY, COMPUTING, AND SIMULATION

Section Editor:
Jeffrey M. Feldman

Temporal Artery Versus Bladder Thermometry During Perioperative and Intensive Care Unit Monitoring

Oliver Kimberger, MD*, Delphine Cohen, MSc{dagger}, Udo Illievich, MD{ddagger}, and Rainer Lenhardt, MD§

From the *Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Medical University, Vienna, Austria; {dagger}Department of Anesthesiology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland; {ddagger}Department of Anesthesiology, Wagner-Jauregg Nervenklinik, Lint, Austria; and §Outcomes Research Institute and Department of Anesthesiology, University of Louisville, Kentucky.

Address correspondence to Oliver Kimberger, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna 1090, Austria. Address e-mail to study{at}kimberger.at or www.or.org.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
BACKGROUND: Core temperature measurements are an important component of perioperative patient monitoring. It is fairly easy to obtain core temperature measurements invasively in anesthetized patients. However, such measurements are more difficult to obtain noninvasively in awake patients. Recently, a new version of a temporal artery thermometer for noninvasive core temperature measurements (TemporalScannerTM TAT-5000) was introduced with accuracy and precision advertised as being comparable to invasive core temperature measurements. In this study, we sought to determine if this new thermometer is an acceptable substitute for invasive bladder temperature measurement.

METHODS: In 35 patients undergoing neurosurgical interventions and 35 patients in the neurosurgical intensive care unit, measurements from the temporal artery thermometer were compared with those from a bladder thermometer. Four measurements were obtained from each patient.

RESULTS: Overall 280 measurement pairs were obtained. The mean bias between the methods was 0.07°C ± 0.79°C; the limits of agreement were {approx}3 times greater than the a priori defined limit of ±0.5°C (–1.48 to 1.62). The sensitivity for detecting fever (core temperature >37.8°C) using the temporal artery thermometer was 0.72, and the specificity was 0.97. The positive predictive value for fever was 0.89; the negative predictive value was 0.94. The sensitivity for detecting hypothermia (core temperature <35.5°C) was 0.29, and the specificity was 0.95. The positive predictive value for hypothermia was 0.31, and the negative predictive value was 0.95.

CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study do not support the use of temporal artery thermometry for perioperative core temperature monitoring; the temporal artery thermometer does not provide information that is an adequate substitute for core temperature measurement by a bladder thermometer.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Core temperature measurement is an important component of perioperative patient monitoring, as both core hypothermia (1–3) and core hyperthermia (4–8) have significant implications for the surgical patient.

Accurate core temperature measurements can be obtained from several locations including the distal esophagus, rectum, bladder, and pulmonary artery, among others. Obtaining these core temperature measurements in the anesthetized and tracheally intubated patient is fairly easy, yet for unanesthetized patients, many core temperature measurement methods are either too invasive or simply not feasible. In the neurosurgical intensive care unit (ICU), patients are often unanesthetized to enable close neurological monitoring. Core temperature monitoring can also be difficult in patients with neuraxial anesthesia. However, these patients are as likely as patients with general anesthesia to become hypothermic, and so proper temperature monitoring is no less important (9). There is a similar need for a fast and accurate yet noninvasive core temperature monitoring system in pediatric care, where rectal thermometry is still considered the "gold standard" of temperature measurement.

There are several noninvasive methods for core temperature measurements and they have proven to be of limited value: Axillary methods (10–13), aural canal infrared thermometers (14–17), and liquid crystal forehead thermometers (18) are not accurate enough for clinical purposes; both axillary and aural canal thermometers have a low sensitivity for detecting fever in comparison to standard core temperature measurement methods (16). Likewise, in pediatric patients, supralingual thermometry with pacifier thermometers cannot replace rectal thermometry (19).

A new type of infrared temporal artery thermometer has recently been developed (TemporalScannerTM TAT-5000, Exergen, Boston, MA) with the goal of providing a more accurate noninvasive measure of core temperature. This new device records skin temperature on the area over the temporal artery at a rate up to 1000 measurements per second. The highest temperature is registered, and core temperature is calculated using a proprietary algorithm that compensates for ambient temperature. Previous versions of this thermometer have been tested in several, predominantly pediatric, studies. These studies have shown the temporal thermometer to be more accurate than aural infrared thermometers (20), and useful as a screening method for clinically important fever in children (21–23), yet it was not recommended for routine clinical use and deemed too inaccurate to replace standard invasive temperature measurements (19,22–24). However, the new version of the thermometer, TAT-5000, claims to be as accurate and precise as invasive core temperature thermometry because of improvements in the hardware and the user guidelines.

We tested the TAT-5000 temporal artery thermometer in a neurosurgical patient population, which has a high risk for fever (25). Specifically, we compared the TAT-5000 temporal artery thermometer with a bladder thermometer (26) and assessed the sensitivity and specificity of the temporal artery thermometer for detecting hypothermia and fever. The goal of the study was to determine if the temporal artery thermometer agreed closely enough with bladder temperature measurements to be a useful substitute in the perioperative and the intensive care setting.


   METHODS
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Written informed consent was obtained from all participating patients after the protocol was approved by the IRB of the Medical University of Vienna. We studied 35 patients scheduled for open cranial or spinal surgery during their procedures and 35 patients in the neurosurgical ICU. Patients studied during surgery were not studied again if admitted to the neurosurgical ICU. All patients were 18- to 80-yr old.

Morphometric and demographic patient characteristics were initially recorded. Patients were managed according to the discretion of the responsible anesthesiologist. All temporal artery thermometer measurements were conducted by one experienced anesthesiologist trained to use the device.

A bladder temperature sensor (accuracy ±0.2°C) incorporated into a urinary drainage catheter (Smiths-Medical, London, United Kingdom) (26,27) was inserted after arrival to the neurosurgical operating room (OR) or to the neurosurgical ICU, respectively. Temporal temperatures were recorded in the OR at four times: 1) at arrival in the OR; 2) 30 minutes after anesthetic induction; 3) at the end of surgery; and 4) 30 minutes after arrival in the postanesthesia care unit. In the neurosurgical ICU, temperature was recorded four times at 1-h intervals. From each OR- and ICU-patient, four measurements were acquired (280 measurements overall).

Temporal artery measurements were performed according to the TAT-5000 manual: The patient’s hair was brushed aside if necessary, and the probe was positioned on the center of the patient’s forehead. The measurement button was depressed, and the measurement was performed sliding from the center midline across the forehead to the hairline. With the button still depressed, the probe was lifted from the forehead and the region behind the earlobe was scanned, as recommended, to exclude falsely low temperature readings caused by evaporative cooling due to forehead sweating. Then, the button was released and the temperature recorded. The duration of this procedure was {approx}5 seconds. This procedure was repeated immediately to assess repeatability. For method comparison, the two measurements were averaged. During the first temporal artery measurement, bladder temperature was recorded. Other recorded variables were forehead sweating and the use of a warming/cooling forced air device.

Thermal management in the neurosurgical OR consisted of forced air warming (Bair HuggerTM, Arizant, MN). In the neurosurgical ICU, treatment for fever was performed according to a routine protocol, which included the administration of metamizol and forced air cooling (PolarAirTM, Arizant, MN).

Our primary outcome was the agreement in temperature reading between the established method (bladder temperature) and the temporal artery thermometer. Our secondary outcome was sensitivity and specificity for fever and hypothermia. Fever was defined as core temperature >37.8°C, and hypothermia was defined as core temperature <35.5°C. A priori the acceptable limits of agreement were chosen to be ±0.5°C. These limits can be considered clinically relevant, as a change of >0.5°C exceeds the usual temperature cycle variations in humans (28) and has been used in similar, previous studies (24,29).

Statistical Analysis
Bland-Altman analysis (30) was used to assess the difference between the average of two subsequent temporal artery measurements and the bladder thermometer measurement. Limits of agreement <±0.5°C were defined a priori as clinically acceptable. If the observed limits of agreement ({approx}two standard deviations around the mean difference) were clinically acceptable as a priori defined (<±0.5°C), the two methods were considered equivalent. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals were calculated for mean bias, upper and lower limits of agreement, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values for fever and hypothermia. For assessment of repeatability, the intraclass correlation coefficient and the repeatability coefficient (31) were calculated. To exclude a relationship between the magnitude of measurement and method—discrepancy or repeatability error, a rank correlation coefficient was calculated. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were plotted for the detection of fever >37.8°C and hypothermia <35.5°C and the areas under the curves were calculated.

Data were analyzed using MedCalc (MedCalc Corporation, Belgium) for Bland-Altman and ROC-curve analysis; for other analysis, SPSS (SPSS, Chicago, IL) was used.


   RESULTS
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Seventy patients were enrolled in the study: 35 in the neurosurgical OR and 35 in the neurosurgical ICU. All enrolled patients completed the study and four measurements were obtained from each patient. Demographic and morphometric variables, use of BairHuggerTM or PolarAirTM and diagnosis of fever or hypothermia are displayed in Table 1. Neurosurgical interventions included open cranial tumor surgery, aneurysm clipping surgery, and spinal surgery. Patients in the neurosurgical ICU were studied only if they consented before surgery. Overall 280 measurement pairs were obtained.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1. Demographics and Morphometric Characteristics, Overall Mean Temperature

 

Method Comparison
Bladder temperatures ranged from 34.8°C to 41.3°C, temporal artery measurements ranged from 32.6°C to 41.1°C. There was no significant correlation between method discrepancy and magnitude of measurement (P = 0.8). As the discrepancy between the thermometers did not differ between groups or time points (results not shown), data were pooled for Bland-Altman analysis. The mean bias between the methods was low, yet the limits of agreement were {approx}3 times more than the 0.5°C limit considered a priori to be clinically acceptable (Table 2, Fig. 1). Mean bias in mildly febrile or hypothermic patients was significantly greater than overall bias (P = 0.005, P < 0.001, respectively; Mann-Whitney U Test, Table 2). Sweating or the use of a forced air cooling/warming device had no influence on the temporal artery measurements (results not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 2. Agreement Between Study Thermometers; 280 Measurement Pairs (Bladder Versus Temporal Artery Thermometer TAT-5000)

 

Figure 124
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 1. Bland-Altman plot: method comparison—Bland-Altman plot comparing the temporal artery and bladder temperature measurements (280 measurement pairs). The x axis is the average of the two measurements. The y axis is the bias that is the difference of the two measurements (temporal artery–bladder).

 

Repeatability
There was no significant correlation between repeatability error and magnitude of measurement (P = 0.6). The repeatability coefficient for 2 subsequent temporal artery measurements was 1.25°C. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.67–0.78).

The TAT-5000 thermometer’s sensitivity for the detection of fever and for the detection of hypothermia is displayed in Table 3. The area under the ROC curve for detection of fever >37.8°C was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92–0.98; Fig. 2); the area under the ROC curve for detection of hypothermia <35.5°C was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.66–0.77; Fig. 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 3. Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of the Temporal Artery Thermometer (TAT-5000) to Detect Mild Fever and Mild Hypothermia

 

Figure 224
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 2. ROC curve: detection of fever (>37.8°C) with the temporal artery thermometer—dashed lines (Figure 224): 95% confidence interval.

 

Figure 324
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 3. ROC curve: detection of hypothermia (<35.5°C) with the temporal artery thermometer—dashed lines (Figure 324): 95% confidence interval.

 


   DISCUSSION
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
This study demonstrates that the TAT-5000 temporal artery thermometer does not provide information that is an adequate substitute for core temperature measurement by a bladder thermometer. In an environment such as perioperative neurosurgical care, where precise temperature measurements are important, the temporal artery thermometer cannot be recommended. We defined a clinically acceptable bias of ±0.5°C, as this range is within the range of normal circadian body temperature variations (28,32) and is also consistent with the bias found when comparing different standard core temperature measurement sites (33,34). The limits of agreement between bladder and temporal artery thermometry were more than twice this clinically acceptable range (Table 2). Sensitivity for detecting low-grade fever was acceptable only for fever screening purposes (Table 3). Sensitivity for detecting hypothermia was very poor (Table 3). As inadvertent perioperative hypothermia is not uncommon and has been shown to be associated with numerous comorbidities (1–3), this result is of particular importance. In contrast to previous studies, forehead sweating had no significant influence on the performance of the temporal artery thermometer (24). This may have been due to the improved user guidelines mandating a measurement behind the earlobe, where there is less evaporative cooling.

This is the first report comparing the new TAT-5000 temporal artery thermometer to bladder thermometry in a perioperative and intensive care setting. Several studies have evaluated consumer and professional models of temporal artery thermometers manufactured by Exergen, primarily in a pediatric setting. In these studies, the temporal artery thermometer was compared to standard core temperature measurement sites: bladder temperature, pulmonary artery temperature, rectal temperature, axillary temperature, and aural infrared temperature. The temporal artery thermometer proved to surpass axillary and aural infrared thermometers, and was found to be sufficiently accurate to serve as a screening method for high rectal fever in a pediatric population. All of the following studies tested previous versions of the TAT-5000: Suleman et al. (24) compared the temporal thermometer in a fairly small sample size with pulmonary artery catheters and bladder catheters; the performance of the thermometer was very poor and a sensitivity of 0% for fever was measured in adults. Greenes and Fleisher (20) found an adequate sensitivity for the temporal artery thermometer only for patients with high rectal fever and recommended it solely as a better alternative to the aural infrared thermometer. Schuh et al. (22) found the professional version of the medical-grade temporal artery thermometer to be an effective screening method, yet it was not able to replace rectal thermometry. In a recent study, Hebbar et al. (23) does not recommend the temporal artery thermometer as a replacement for invasive core temperature measurements, yet judges it to be more reliable and applicable than axillary temperature measurements. In accordance with these studies, we are not able to recommend the use of the new temporal artery thermometer as a substitute for standard core temperature measurements because of its inadequate agreement with bladder temperature, its poor performance for detecting mild hyper- and hypothermia, and its wide range of repeatability error.

A limitation of our study is the use of bladder temperature to measure core temperature. It is not an undisputed core temperature measurement site, and pulmonary artery temperature measurements would certainly have been preferable, yet they were generally considered too invasive in our patients. The inaccuracies caused by this core temperature measurement site may have contributed somewhat to the study results. Furthermore, Greenes and Fleisher (35) found that rectal temperature measurements lag behind those measured at the temporal artery. It can therefore not be excluded that a similar temperature lag further contributed to a deterioration of our temporal artery thermometer results. Another limitation is that although four measurements were obtained in one patient, these measurements were treated as independent measurements. For method comparison, two subsequent temporal artery measurements were averaged; discrepancies between the thermometry methods might have been even greater if only a single temporal artery measurement had been performed.

The range of bladder temperature in our patients was narrow. It included only a few patients with high fever or moderate-to-deep hypothermic temperatures. Thus, statements about the performance of the temporal artery thermometer under febrile conditions or during moderate or deep hypothermia are not possible. Finally, 74% of the study patients had some kind of cranial surgery. It is not known to what extent a surgical cranial intervention influences temporal artery flow and the temperature of the skin over the temporal artery.

In conclusion, screening for fever and measurement of core temperature, when other more invasive measurement methods are not feasible, may be applications for the temporal artery thermometer. However, the new version of the temporal artery thermometer, Temporal Scanner TAT-5000, cannot replace more invasive temperature monitoring systems when highly reproducible core temperature measurements are required.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Nancy Alsip, PhD, for editing this manuscript. Her salary is paid by the Outcomes Research Institute of the University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.


   Footnotes
 
Accepted for publication June 18, 2007.

Presented, in part, at the Euroanesthesia-Congress, Vienna, 2005.

None of the authors has a personal financial interest related to this work.

Reprints will not be available from the author.


   REFERENCES
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Kurz A, Sessler DI, Lenhardt R. Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospitalization. Study of Wound Infection and Temperature Group. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1209–15[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Lenhardt R, Marker E, Goll V, Tschernich H, Kurz A, Sessler DI, Narzt E, Lackner F. Mild intraoperative hypothermia prolongs postanesthetic recovery. Anesthesiology 1997;87:1318–23[Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Schmied H, Kurz A, Sessler DI, Kozek S, Reiter A. Mild hypothermia increases blood loss and transfusion requirements during total hip arthroplasty. Lancet 1996;347:289–92[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Kotani N, Kushikata T, Matsukawa T, Sessler DI, Muraoka M, Hashimoto H, Ishihara H, Matsuki A. A rapid increase in foot tissue temperature predicts cardiovascular collapse during anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions. Anesthesiology 1997; 87:559–68[Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Gronert GA. Malignant hyperthermia. Anesthesiology 1980; 53:395–423[Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Baena RC, Busto R, Dietrich WD, Globus MY, Ginsberg MD. Hyperthermia delayed by 24 hours aggravates neuronal damage in rat hippocampus following global ischemia. Neurology 1997;48:768–73[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Dietrich WD, Busto R, Valdes I, Loor Y. Effects of normothermic versus mild hyperthermic forebrain ischemia in rats. Stroke 1990;21:1318–25[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Yu CG, Jagid J, Ruenes G, Dietrich WD, Marcillo AE, Yezierski RP. Detrimental effects of systemic hyperthermia on locomotor function and histopathological outcome after traumatic spinal cord injury in the rat. Neurosurgery 2001;49:152–8[Web of Science][Medline]
  9. Saito T, Sessler DI, Fujita K, Ooi Y, Jeffrey R. Thermoregulatory effects of spinal and epidural anesthesia during cesarean delivery. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1998;23:418–23[Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Kresch MJ. Axillary temperature as a screening test for fever in children. J Pediatr 1984;104:596–9[Web of Science][Medline]
  11. Morley CJ, Hewson PH, Thornton AJ, Cole TJ. Axillary and rectal temperature measurements in infants. Arch Dis Child 1992;67:122–5[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Muma BK, Treloar DJ, Wurmlinger K, Peterson E, Vitae A. Comparison of rectal, axillary, and tympanic membrane temperatures in infants and young children. Ann Emerg Med 1991;20:41–4[Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Wilshaw R, Beckstrand R, Waid D, Schaalje GB. A comparison of the use of tympanic, axillary, and rectal thermometers in infants. J Pediatr Nurs 1999;14:88–93[Medline]
  14. Hooker EA. Use of tympanic thermometers to screen for fever in patients in a pediatric emergency department. South Med J 1993;86:855–8[Web of Science][Medline]
  15. Imamura M, Matsukawa T, Ozaki M, Sessler DI, Nishiyama T, Kumazawa T. The accuracy and precision of four infrared aural canal thermometers during cardiac surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1998;42:1222–6[Web of Science][Medline]
  16. Jean-Mary MB, Dicanzio J, Shaw J, Bernstein HH. Limited accuracy and reliability of infrared axillary and aural thermometers in a pediatric outpatient population. J Pediatr 2002; 141:671–6[Web of Science][Medline]
  17. Modell JG, Katholi CR, Kumaramangalam SM, Hudson EC, Graham D. Unreliability of the infrared tympanic thermometer in clinical practice: a comparative study with oral mercury and oral electronic thermometers. South Med J 1998;91:649–54[Web of Science][Medline]
  18. Cattaneo CG, Frank SM, Hesel TW, El-Rahmany HK, Kim LJ, Tran KM. The accuracy and precision of body temperature monitoring methods during regional and general anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2000;90:938–45[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Callanan D. Detecting fever in young infants: reliability of perceived, pacifier, and temporal artery temperatures in infants younger than 3 months of age. Pediatr Emerg Care 2003; 19:240–3[Web of Science][Medline]
  20. Greenes DS, Fleisher GR. Accuracy of a noninvasive temporal artery thermometer for use in infants. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001;155:376–81[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Siberry GK, Diener-West M, Schappell E, Karron RA. Comparison of temple temperatures with rectal temperatures in children under two years of age. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2002;41:405–14[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Schuh S, Komar L, Stephens D, Chu L, Read S, Allen U. Comparison of the temporal artery and rectal thermometry in children in the emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care 2004;20:736–41[Web of Science][Medline]
  23. Hebbar K, Fortenberry JD, Rogers K, Merritt R, Easley K. Comparison of temporal artery thermometer to standard temperature measurements in pediatric intensive care unit patients. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2005;6:557–61[Medline]
  24. Suleman MI, Doufas AG, Akca O, Ducharme M, Sessler DI. Insufficiency in a new temporal-artery thermometer for adult and pediatric patients. Anesth Analg 2002;95:67–71[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Diringer MN, Reaven NL, Funk SE, Uman GC. Elevated body temperature independently contributes to increased length of stay in neurologic intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 2004;32:1489–95[Web of Science][Medline]
  26. Fallis WM. Monitoring urinary bladder temperature in the intensive care unit: state of the science. Am J Crit Care 2002;11:38–45[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Maxton FJ, Justin L, Gillies D. Estimating core temperature in infants and children after cardiac surgery: a comparison of six methods. J Adv Nurs 2004;45:214–22[Web of Science][Medline]
  28. Sessler DI, Lee KA, McGuire J. Isoflurane anesthesia and circadian temperature cycles in humans. Anesthesiology 1991;75:985–9[Web of Science][Medline]
  29. Moran JL, Peter JV, Solomon PJ, Grealy B, Smith T, Ashforth W, Wake M, Peake SL, Peisach AR. Tympanic temperature measurements: are they reliable in the critically ill? A clinical study of measures of agreement. Crit Care Med 2007;35:155–64[Web of Science][Medline]
  30. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307–10[Web of Science][Medline]
  31. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measurement error. BMJ 1996;313:744[Free Full Text]
  32. Tayefeh F, Plattner O, Sessler DI, Ikeda T, Marder D. Circadian changes in the sweating-to-vasoconstriction interthreshold range. Pflugers Arch 1998;435:402–6[Web of Science][Medline]
  33. Lefrant JY, Muller L, de La Coussaye JE, Benbabaali M, Lebris C, Zeitoun N, Mari C, Saissi G, Ripart J, Eledjam JJ. Temperature measurement in intensive care patients: comparison of urinary bladder, oesophageal, rectal, axillary, and inguinal methods versus pulmonary artery core method. Intensive Care Med 2003;29:414–8[Web of Science][Medline]
  34. Cork RC, Vaughan RW, Humphrey LS. Precision and accuracy of intraoperative temperature monitoring. Anesth Analg 1983;62:211–4[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Greenes DS, Fleisher GR. When body temperature changes, does rectal temperature lag? J Pediatr 2004;144:824–6[Web of Science][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
O. Kimberger, R. Thell, M. Schuh, J. Koch, D. I. Sessler, and A. Kurz
Accuracy and precision of a novel non-invasive core thermometer
Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2009; 103(2): 226 - 231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Crit Care NurseHome page
E. Bridges and K. Thomas
Noninvasive Measurement of Body Temperature in Critically Ill Patients
Crit. Care Nurse, June 1, 2009; 29(3): 94 - 97.
[Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kimberger, O.
Right arrow Articles by Lenhardt, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kimberger, O.
Right arrow Articles by Lenhardt, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Critical Care
Right arrow Equipment
Right arrow Monitoring (Non-cardiac)
Right arrow Technology

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2007 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press