| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The anatomical position of the jet suggested a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) with left-to-right shunting. Injection of agitated saline into the RA showed no echolucency in the main PA (Fig. 2). There was no increase in the partial pressure of oxygen between the RA and pulmonary capillary blood aspirated from the distal lumen of the PA catheter.
Aortic resection revealed an 8 mm wide by 1 cm long conduit connecting the false lumen of the aorta to the main PA. Based on anatomic location and gross appearance, this was diagnosed intraoperatively as a PDA. On postoperative review of her preoperative MRI, a connection between the aortic false lumen and the main PA was noted. The fetal ductus arteriosus arises from the aorta opposite the origin of the left subclavian artery. It connects the aorta to the bifurcation of the PA at the origin of the left PA. The ductus arteriosus normally closes in the weeks after birth, but persists in 10% of cases of adult congenital heart disease (1). It may cause a murmur at the left sternal border, and may be seen, if calcified, on chest radiograph. Persistent left-to-right shunting can cause LV volume overload, right ventricular pressure overload, and pulmonary hypertension. Increasingly higher right-sided pressures may eventually lead to Eisenmenger's physiology, with bidirectional or right-to-left shunting (2). Congestive heart failure and endocarditis may also occur. During cardiopulmonary bypass, a PDA would provide blood flow to the PA, potentially causing LV filling and distention in the absence of an LV vent. Transesophageal echocardiography can demonstrate a PDA in the upper esophageal ascending aortic short axis view with color Doppler flow mapping, showing left-to-right shunting as high-velocity flow in the region of the left PA (1,3). IV agitated saline injection may show microbubbles in the descending aorta with bidirectional shunting (4), or echolucency in the main PA with left-to-right flow. The Qp/Qs ratio quantifies the amount of shunting and can be calculated using blood oximetry or two-dimensional echocardiography and Doppler. The anatomic features of a PDA limit the sensitivity of echocardiographic and clinical confirmatory tests; its distal location relative to more proximal intracardiac shunts, such as a patent foramen ovale, may make agitated saline studies less sensitive. Also, a comparison of RA and pulmonary capillary blood may not show an increase in oxygenation from left-to-right shunting if PDA flow was directed into the left PA, away from a right-sided PA catheter. In our case, the presence of an aortic dissection complicated the diagnosis of a PDA. The expected systolic gradient across the conduit would have been 75 mm Hg systolic blood pressure–PA systolic pressure. In reality, the velocity across the PDA was 2 m/s, yielding an observed peak gradient of 16 mm Hg (Modified Bernoulli Equation; Gradient = 4 x (2 m/s)2). The large difference between the expected and the observed gradients could be explained by kinking of the PDA at its origin by the dissection, by flow originating from the low-pressure aortic false lumen, or by under-estimation of jet velocity due to the intercept angle between the jet and the Doppler beam. The lack of an increase in oxygenation between the RA and pulmonary capillary blood could have been due either to sampling of blood from the right PA, which was not receiving PDA blood flow, or to shunting of deoxygenated blood from the aortic false lumen to the PA. The presence of a large, silent PDA is surprising in a patient of this age. We offer two explanations for the absence of Eisenmenger's physiology or other late sequelae of left-to-right shunting in this patient. One previous report posits the reopening of a closed ductus arteriosus by an aortic dissection (5). Our patient's chronic dissection may have recannulated her PDA. Alternately, the conduit we identified may have been an aorta-to-PA fistula. Of note, the location of the conduit seen on the patient's preoperative MRI suggested the possibility of an aorta-to-PA fistula rather than a PDA. Although such a structure could be a complication of this patient's longstanding aortic disease, its location and gross appearance in situ suggested a PDA.
Footnotes This article has supplementary material on the Web site: www.anesthesia-analgesia.org. Accepted for publication July 17, 2007. Reprints will not be available from the author. REFERENCES
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|