JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 2007; 105:1489-1493
© 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000286173.60987.72
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sato, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Seo, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sato, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Seo, N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pain Mechanisms
Right arrow Preclinical Pharmacology
Right arrow Pain
Right arrow Pharmacology


PAIN MECHANISMS

The Differential Effect of Cyclosporine on Hypnotic Response and Pain Reaction in Mice

Yuki Sato, MD, PhD*, Tatsushi Onaka, MD, PhD{dagger}, Eiji Kobayashi, MD, PhD{ddagger}, and Norimasa Seo, MD, PhD*

From the Departments of *Anesthesiology and {dagger}Physiology; and {ddagger}Divisions of Organ Replacement Research, Center for Molecular Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Yuki Sato, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan. Address e-mail to aneyuki{at}jichi.ac.jp.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The calcineurin inhibitor, cyclosporine, is widely used for preventing allograft rejection in organ transplantation. Systemically administered cyclosporine is prevented from entering into the brain by the action of P-glycoprotein, encoded by the multidrug resistant 1 (mdr1) gene. However, in many transplant recipients, cyclosporine administration causes postoperative neuropsychological side effects, such as confusion, depression, and anxiety. Recently, calcineurin-inhibitor-induced pain syndrome, characterized by severe pain in the lower limbs, has also been recognized in both organ and stem-cell transplantations.

METHODS: In the present study, we developed behavioral models in wild-type and mdr1a knockout mice to reveal whether peripheral or central cyclosporine alters pain reactions and hypnotic sensitivities. Cyclosporine's central actions can be better evaluated in mdr1a knockout mice that lack P-glycoprotein. After intraperitoneal administration of cyclosporine, we examined tail-flick latency in the tail immersion test, or duration of loss of righting reflex in response to pentobarbital and ketamine.

RESULTS: In wild-type mice, the highest dose of cyclosporine significantly prolonged the duration of loss of righting reflex in response to ketamine, but not to pentobarbital. On the other hand, the lower doses of cyclosporine significantly increased both pentobarbital- and ketamine-induced sleep durations in mdr1a knockout mice. Tail-flick latencies in the tail immersion test were significantly shortened in both wild-type and knockout mice by the administration of cyclosporine.

CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that centrally accumulated cyclosporine enhances the hypnotic response to pentobarbital and ketamine, but peripheral cyclosporine induces hyperalgesia.

Cyclosporine, a cyclic peptide of 11 aminoacids, is used as a first-line treatment for preventing allograft rejection (1), and acts selectively on the early activated T-lymphocytes to inhibit production of soluble proliferative factors, interleukin-2, and other cytokines (2). A large portion of systemically administered cyclosporine is prevented from concentrating in the brain by the action of P-glycoprotein, an adenosine triphosphate-dependent efflux pump transporter encoded by the multidrug resistant 1 (mdr1) gene (3,4). However, in many transplant recipients, cyclosporine administration causes postoperative neuropsychological side effects, such as confusion, depression, and anxiety. Furthermore, calcineurin-inhibitor-induced pain syndrome, characterized by severe pain in the lower limbs, has recently been recognized in the setting of organ and stem-cell transplantations (5–8). Although the underlying mechanisms of these side effects remain unclear (9–13), previous animal experiments demonstrated contradicting effects that cyclosporine increases not only sleeping time from barbiturate administration (14–16) but also isoflurane minimal alveolar concentration of anesthetic (which produces immobility in response to a noxious stimulus in 50% of subjects) (17). Because cyclosporine concentrations in the brain are 17 to 50-fold higher in mdr1a knockout mice than in wild-type mice after systemic administration (3,4), it is thus possible that cyclosporine may affect pain sensitivity at a lower dose of systemic administration in mdr1 knockout mice lacking P-glycoprotein than in wild-type mice. Here we examined the effects of cyclosporine on nociceptive sensitivity in mdr1a knockout and wild-type mice. Using these mice, we also investigated whether cyclosporine affects hypnotic responses induced by anesthetics.

METHODS

Animals
All experiments were performed in accordance with the Jichi Medical University Guide for Laboratory Animals. We obtained permission from the animal care committee to perform the study. Wild-type male Friends virus B mice (CLEA, Tokyo, Japan) and male mdr1a knockout mice (Taconic, NY) on a Friends virus B background weighing 25–35 g were used. These wild-type mice and knockout mice were maintained in a pathogen-free room in a controlled environment (22°C ± 2°C temperature, light/dark cycle [12 h each], light on at 07:00, 40%–60% humidity). During the experiments, each mouse was housed individually in its own cage, and food and water were provided ad libitum.

Drugs
Cyclosporine (Wako, Osaka, Japan) was dissolved in 95% ethanol at a concentration of 100 mg/mL, diluted in Intralipid (Otsuka, Tokyo, Japan) as a carrier (18) and injected intraperitoneally. To examine the hypnotic action of IV anesthetics, pentobarbital (Dainippon, Tokyo, Japan) or ketamine (Sankyo, Tokyo, Japan) diluted in saline was used.

Evaluation of Baseline Motor Function
To confirm whether motor function of knockout mice is not different from that of wild-type mice, we used the automated accelerating rotarod (Ohara, Tokyo, Japan) (19,20). Each mouse was placed on the rotating cylinder and the speed of the cylinder rotation was gradually accelerated from 4 to 40 revolutions per min over a 5-min period. Latency to fall from the rotarod was recorded (21).

Effect of Cyclosporine on Hypnotic Responses
Four hours after intraperitoneal injection of cyclosporine (10 and 60 mg/kg), pentobarbital (50 mg/kg), or ketamine (200 mg/kg) was administered intraperitoneally. In rodents, it has been demonstrated that the bioavailability of cyclosporine in the serum peaks at approximately 4 h after intraperitoneal administration (22). The brain concentration of peripherally injected [3H]cyclosporine was significantly increased 17-fold in mdr1a gene-deficient mice compared with those of normal mice, providing the in vivo evidence for the involvement of P-glycoprotein in transportation of cyclosporine (3,4,23,24).

Hypnotic responses were evaluated as the duration of loss of the righting reflex. As described previously (25), loss of righting reflex was defined as a failure of the mouse to right itself for at least 10 s after being placed on its back. Recovery from the loss of righting reflex was defined as having occurred when the mouse spontaneously righted itself (25). During anesthesia, the animals were kept warm on a plate heated to 38°C. The investigators were blinded to the animals and continuously observed the behavior of the animals during the experiments.

Measurement of Blood Plasma Concentration of Ketamine and Pentobarbital
Because cyclosporine is a potent inhibitor of P450s and both ketamine and pentobarbital are metabolized by P450, the effects of cyclosporine on the pharmacokinetics of pentobarbital and ketamine were measured. Mice were intraperitoneally injected with 60 mg/kg of cyclosporine or vehicle. Four hours later, pentobarbital or ketamine was administered intraperitoneally. Ten, 20, and 60 min after the administration of these anesthetics, trunk blood samples were obtained by decapitation. The plasma concentration of ketamine and pentobarbital was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography at Research Laboratories in Daiich-Sankyo Co. Ltd. and Sumika Chemical Analysis Service, Ltd., respectively.

Effect of Cyclosporine on Pain Reaction
The tail-immersion assay was used to study the pain response (18,26). Four hours after intraperitoneal injection of cyclosporine (1, 10, and 60 mg/kg), the tails of the mice were immersed 2 cm in water of 48°C and the latency time to a rapid tail flick was measured five separate times on each animal over a 15-min period allowing a 3–4 min recovery period between each trial. To prevent injury, the tail was removed from the water within 10 s if the animal did not respond. The times for each animal in each group were then averaged to yield a group mean and standard deviations for comparisons.

Statistics
Statistical analyses were performed using two- or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), or t-test. For multiple comparisons, the Tukey's method was used as a post hoc test. Data are expressed as the mean ± sd. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Baseline Motor Function in Wild-Type and mdr1a Knockout Mice
To examine motor functions, we first performed the rotarod test and latencies to fall from the rotarod were measured. As shown in Figure 1, there were no significant differences between the wild-type and knockout mice by one-way ANOVA [F(1,74) = 1.63, P = 0.21]. These results indicate that knockout mice have no abnormal motor functions and behave normal in laboratory conditions.


Figure 151
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Latency to fall from the rotarod. Both wild-type (open bars) and mdr1a knockout (filled bars) mice showed improved performance over three consecutive sessions in which the rotarod speed accelerated gradually from 4 to 40 rpm. There are no significant differences between the wild-type (n = 11) and knockout mice (n = 14) by one-way ANOVA [F(1,74) = 1.63 P = 0.21]. Data are expressed as the mean ± sd.

 

Cyclosporine Augments Hypnotic Responses to Pentobarbital and Ketamine
Without cyclosporine treatments, pentobarbital (Fig. 2) and ketamine (Fig. 3) induced duration of loss of righting reflex in mdr1a knockout mice were similar to those in wild-type mice (P = 0.94 and 0.31, respectively). With cyclosporine treatments, only 60 mg/kg of cyclosporine significantly prolonged the duration of the loss of the righting reflex after ketamine [F(2,35) = 21.96, P < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA] (Fig. 3) but not pentobarbital administration [F(2,32) = 0.99, P = 0.38 by one-way ANOVA] (Fig. 2) in wild-type mice. On the other hand, in mdr1a knockout mice, both 10 and 60 mg/kg of cyclosporine significantly increased pentobarbital- and ketamine-induced sleep times [F(2,29) = 37.05, P < 0.001, and F(2,32) = 9.42, P < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA, respectively] (Figs. 2 and 3). These results suggest that centrally accumulated cyclosporine might enhance the hypnotic response to ketamine and pentobarbital.


Figure 251
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Effect of cyclosporine on hypnotic responses to pentobarbital in wild-type (open bars) and mdr1a knockout (filled bars) mice. Cyclosporine did not significantly prolong duration of loss of righting reflex (LORR) in response to pentobarbital in wild-type mice [F(2,32) = 0.99 P = 0.38] (n = 11 in each). However, in mdr1a knockout mice, both 10 and 60 mg/kg of cyclosporine significantly increased sleep duration [F(2,29) = 37.05, P < 0.001] (n = 10 in each). Data are expressed as the mean ± sd.

 

Figure 351
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Effect of cyclosporine on hypnotic responses to ketamine in wild-type (open bars) and mdr1a knockout (filled bars) mice. Cyclosporine at the highest dose of 60 mg/kg significantly prolonged duration of loss of righting reflex (LORR) in response to ketamine [F(2,35) = 21.96, P < 0.001] (n = 12 in each) in wild mice. On the other hand, in mdr1a knockout mice, both 10 and 60 mg/kg of cyclosporine significantly increased sleep duration [F(2,32) = 9.42, P < 0.001] (n = 11 in each). Data are expressed as the mean ± sd.

 

Plasma Blood Concentrations of Ketamine and Pentobarbital in Cyclosporine-Treated Wild-Type Mice
To examine whether cyclosporine administration changes the pharmacokinetics of anesthetic drugs, plasma concentrations of pentobarbital and ketamine were measured in wild-type mice. As shown in Figure 4, there were no significant differences between concentrations of pentobarbital in cyclosporine-treated and untreated wild-type mice [F(1,31) = 0.06, P = 0.81 by one-way ANOVA] (n = 4 in each). On the other hand, cyclosporine-treated wild-type mice had significantly different concentrations of ketamine from untreated mice [F(1,31) = 7.42, P = 0.03 by one-way ANOVA] (n = 4 in each) (Fig. 5).


Figure 451
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Mean plasma concentrations of pentobarbital in cyclosporine-treated (filled circle) or untreated (open square) wild-type mice (n = 4 in each). No significant difference was observed by one-way ANOVA [F(1,31) = 0.06, P = 0.81]. Data are expressed as the mean ± sd.

 

Figure 551
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. Mean plasma concentrations of ketamine in cyclosporine-treated (filled circle) or untreated (open square) wild-type mice (n = 4 in each). Cyclosporine-treated wild-type mice showed significantly different pharmacokinetics of ketamine from untreated mice by one-way ANOVA [F(1,31) = 7.42, P = 0.03]. Data are expressed as the mean ± sd.

 

Cyclosporine Enhances Pain Reactions
As shown in Figure 6, after administration of cyclosporine (10 and 60 mg/kg), tail-flick latencies in the tail immersion test were significantly shortened in both wild-type [F(3,63) = 13.18, P < 0.001] and knockout mice [F(3,68) = 15.00, P < 0.001] by one-way ANOVA. Two-way ANOVA showed no significant differences between wild-type and knockout mice [F(1,130) = 2.59, P = 0.11], indicating that cyclosporine induces hyperalgesia in both wild-type and mdr1a knockout mice.


Figure 651
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6. Effect of cyclosporine on tail-flick latencies in wild-type (open bars) and mdr1a knockout (filled bars) mice. After administration of cyclosporine (10 and 60 mg/kg), tail-flick latencies in the tail immersion test were significantly shortened in both wild-type [F(3,63) = 13.18, P < 0.001] (n = 16 in each) and knockout mice [F (3,68) = 15.00, P < 0.001] (n = 17 in each). Two-way ANOVA showed no significant differences between wild-type and knockout mice [F(1,130) = 2.59, P = 0.11]. Data are expressed as the mean ± sd.

 

DISCUSSION

The entry of most drugs into the brain is strictly regulated by the blood–brain barrier. Major determinants of the permeation of drugs across the blood–brain barrier have long been thought to be lipophilicity and molecular weight (27,28). Anesthetic-related drugs are often characterized by moderate to high permeability across the blood–brain barrier due to their lipophilicity and intermediate molecular weight (29). This was confirmed using our animal models. As demonstrated in Figures 2 and 3, without cyclosporine treatment, pentobarbital- and ketamine-induced duration of loss of righting reflex in mdr1a knockout mice was similar to those in wild-type mice. These results strongly support that P-glycoprotein itself is not involved in the anesthetic action of pentobarbital and ketamine.

On the other hand, although anticancer drugs, such as vincristine, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cyclosporine, are highly lipophilic, the apparent permeation of these drugs across the blood–brain barrier is unexpectedly low (27,28). P-glycoprotein, which is coded by the mdr1 acts as a membrane-active efflux system for these drugs (30). Therefore, mdr1a knockout mice lacking P-glycoprotein are useful animal tools for testing the central effects of cyclosporine, because cyclosporine could easily pass into their brains. As shown in Figures 2 and 3, a 60 mg/kg dose of cyclosporine changed the response to ketamine, but not pentobarbital, in wild-type mice. These findings could be explained by pharmacokinetic data showing that 60 mg/kg of cyclosporine increased the concentration of ketamine, but not pentobarbital (Figs. 4 and 5). On the other hand, in mdr1a knockout mice, both 10 and 60 mg/kg of cyclosporine significantly increased pentobarbital- and ketamine-induced sleep times. Although we could not exclude pharmacokinetic drug interactions between cyclosporine and ketamine or pentobarbital in these knockout mice, our results suggest that centrally accumulated cyclosporine enhances hypnotic responses to both ketamine and pentobarbital.

In the next experiment, we tested whether cyclosporine would modulate pain responses in wild-type and mdr1a knockout mice. There are several previous studies demonstrating pain sensitivities in mdr1a knockout mice. For example, Thompson et al. (31) found that morphine induced greater analgesia in P-glycoprotein knockout mice compared with that in wild-type mice, whereas Scott et al. (32) showed that systemic ondansetron increased pain sensitivity in P-glycoprotein knockout mice but had no effect in wild-type mice. As shown in Figure 6, we found that cyclosporine induces hyperalgesia; however, there were no significant differences between wild-type and knockout mice. Therefore, these results suggest that either cyclosporine has a peripheral effect rather than a central effect or that a sufficient quantity reaches the central nervous systems to have hyperalgesic action.

Consistent with our findings, cyclosporine was shown to attenuate the antinociceptive effects of morphine (18) by activation of a nitric oxide (NO) pathway (33). It has been demonstrated that cyclosporine reduces catalytic activity of neuronal NO synthase (nNOS) via inhibition of calcineurin-mediated dephosphorylation of nNOS and decreases the production of NO (27,28). nNOS is localized in the peripheral and central nervous systems, although the sites of cyclosporine remain unclear. On the other hand, desensitization of capsaicin-evoked currents is greatly reduced by cyclosporine in cultured dorsal root ganglion neurons (34). It is thus tempting to speculate that the direct action of cyclosporine on peripheral nerves for pain perception might be related to the pathogenesis of calcineurin-inhibitor-induced neuropathic pain in humans (35).

To conclude, the present study suggests the possibility that cyclosporine augments hypnotic responses centrally and induces hyperalgesia peripherally. Although the small amount of centrally located cyclosporine could be responsible for the hyperalgesic effect, cyclosporine might have different effects on the central and peripheral nervous systems.

Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 26, 2007.

Supported by the grant from Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (18791104 to YS).

REFERENCES

  1. Kahan BD. Cyclosporine. N Engl J Med 1989;321:1725–38[ISI][Medline]
  2. Flanagan WM, Corthesy B, Bram RJ, Crabtree GR. Nuclear association of a T-cell transcription factor blocked by FK-506 and cyclosporine A. Nature 1991;352:803–7[Medline]
  3. Schinkel AH, Wagenaar E, van Deemter L, Mol CA, Borst P. Absence of the mdr1a P-Glycoprotein in mice affects tissue distribution and pharmacokinetics of dexamethasone, digoxin, and cyclosporine A. J Clin Invest 1995;96:1698–705[ISI][Medline]
  4. Schinkel AH, Wagenaar E, Mol CA, van Deemter L. P-glycoprotein in the blood-brain barrier of mice influences the brain penetration and pharmacological activity of many drugs. J Clin Invest 1996;97:2517–24[ISI][Medline]
  5. Lucas VP, Ponge TD, Plougastel-Lucas ML, Glemain P, Hourmant M, Soulillou JP. Musculoskeletal pain in renal-transplant recipients. N Engl J Med 1991;325:1449–50[ISI][Medline]
  6. Grotz WH, Breitenfeldt MK, Braune SW, Allmann KH, Krause TM, Rump JA, Schollmeyer PJ. Calcineurin-inhibitor induced pain syndrome (CIPS): a severe disabling complication after organ transplantation. Transpl Int 2001;14:16–23[ISI][Medline]
  7. Kida A, Ohashi K, Kobayashii T, Sakai M, Yamashita T, Akiyama H, Kishida S, Sakamaki H. Incapacitating lower limb pain syndrome in cord blood stem cell transplant recipients with calcineurin inhibitor. Pathol Oncol Res 2004;10:204–6[ISI][Medline]
  8. Collini A, De Bartolomeis C, Barni R, Ruggieri G, Bernini M, Carmellini M. Calcineurin-inhibitor induced pain syndrome after organ transplantation. Kidney Int 2006;70:1367–70[ISI][Medline]
  9. Adams DH, Ponsford S, Gunson B, Boon A, Honigsberger L, Williams A, Buckels J, Elias E, McMaster P. Neurological complications following liver transplantation. Lancet 1987; 1:949–51[ISI][Medline]
  10. de Groen PC, Aksamit AJ, Rakela J, Forbes GS, Krom RA. Central nervous system toxicity after liver transplantation. The role of cyclosporine and cholesterol. N Engl J Med 1987; 317:861–6[Abstract]
  11. Kunzendorf U, Brockmoller J, Jochimsen F, Keller F, Walz G, Offermann G. Cyclosporine metabolites and central-nervous-system toxicity. Lancet 1988;1:1223[ISI][Medline]
  12. Hughes RL. Cyclosporine-related central nervous system toxicity in cardiac transplantation. N Engl J Med 1990;323:420–1[ISI][Medline]
  13. Hinchey J, Chaves C, Appignani B, Breen J, Pao L, Wang A, Pessin MS, Lamy C, Mas JL, Caplan LR. A reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome. N Engl J Med 1996; 334:494–500[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Cirella VN, Pantuck CB, Lee YJ, Pantuck EJ. Effects of cyclosporine on anesthetic action. Anesth Analg 1987;66:703–6[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Hoffman A, Levy G. Kinetics of drug action in disease states. XXXVI: Effect of cyclosporine on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of a barbiturate (heptabarbital) in rats. J Pharm Sci 1990;79:19–22[ISI][Medline]
  16. Hoffman A, Habib G, Gilhar D, Zohar H. Cyclosporine increases the CNS sensitivity to the hypnotic effect of phenobarbitone but not ethanol in rats. J Pharm Pharmacol 1994;46:760–4[ISI][Medline]
  17. Niemann CU, Stabernack C, Serkova N, Jacobsen W, Christians U, Eger EI II. Cyclosporine can increase isoflurane MAC. Anesth Analg 2002;95:930–4[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Dougherty PM, Aronowski J, Samorajski T, Dafny N. Opiate antinociception is altered by immune modification: the effect of interferon, cyclosporine and radiation-induced immune suppression upon acute and long-term morphine activity. Brain Res 1986;385:401–4[ISI][Medline]
  19. Jones BJ, Roberts DJ. A rotarod suitable for quantitative measurements of motor incoordination in naive mice. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Exp Pathol Pharmakol 1968;259:211[Medline]
  20. Sango K, Yamanaka S, Hoffmann A, Okuda Y, Grinberg A, Westphal H, McDonald MP, Crawley JN, Sandhoff K, Suzuki K, Proia RL. Mouse models of Tay-Sachs and Sandhoff diseases differ in neurologic phenotype and ganglioside metabolism. Nat Genet 1995;11:170–6[ISI][Medline]
  21. Crawley JN. Behavioral phenotyping of transgenic and knockout mice: experimental design and evaluation of general health, sensory functions, motor abilities, and specific behavioral tests. Brain Res 1999;835:18–26[ISI][Medline]
  22. Luke DR, Brunner LJ, Vadiei K. Bioavailability assessment of cyclosporine in the rat. Influence of route of administration. Drug Metab Dispos 1990;18:158–62[Abstract]
  23. Schinkel AH, Mayer U, Wagenaar E, Mol CA, van Deemter L, Smit JJ, van der Valk MA, Voordouw AC, Spits H, van Tellingen O, Zijlmans JM, Fibbe WE, Borst P. Normal viability and altered pharmacokinetics in mice lacking mdr1-type (drug-transporting) P-glycoproteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:4028–33[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Schinkel AH, Smit JJ, van Tellingen O, Beijnen JH, Wagenaar E, van Deemter L, Mol CA, van der Valk MA, Robanus-Maandag EC, te Riele HP. Disruption of the mouse mdr1a P-glycoprotein gene leads to a deficiency in the blood-brain barrier and to increased sensitivity to drugs. Cell 1994;77:491–502[ISI][Medline]
  25. Sato Y, Kobayashi E, Hakamata Y, Kobahashi M, Wainai T, Murayama T, Mishina M, Seo N. Chronopharmacological studies of ketamine in normal and NMDA epsilon1 receptor knockout mice. Br J Anaesth 2004;92:859–64[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Sarton E, Teppema LJ, Olievier C, Nieuwenhuijs D, Matthes HW, Kieffer BL, Dahan A. The involvement of the mu-opioid receptor in ketamine-induced respiratory depression and antinociception. Anesth Analg 2001;93:1495–500[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Tsuji A. P-glycoprotein-mediated efflux transport of anticancer drugs at the blood-brain barrier. Ther Drug Monit 1998;20:588–90[ISI][Medline]
  28. Golden PL, Pollack GM. Blood-brain barrier efflux transport. J Pharm Sci 2003;92:1739–53[ISI][Medline]
  29. Upton RN. Theoretical aspects of P-glycoprotein mediated drug efflux on the distribution volume of anaesthetic-related drugs in the brain. Anaesth Intensive Care 2002;30:183–91[ISI][Medline]
  30. Sakata A, Tamai I, Kawazu K, Deguchi Y, Ohnishi T, Saheki A, Tsuji A. In vivo evidence for ATP-dependent and P-glycoprotein-mediated transport of cyclosporine A at the blood-brain barrier. Biochem Pharmacol 1994;48:1989–92[ISI][Medline]
  31. Thompson SJ, Koszdin K, Bernards CM. Opiate-induced analgesia is increased and prolonged in mice lacking P-glycoprotein. Anesthesiology 2000;92:1392–9[ISI][Medline]
  32. Scott JA, Wood M, Flood P. The pronociceptive effect of ondansetron in the setting of P-glycoprotein inhibition. Anesth Analg 2006;103:742–6[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Homayoun H, Babaie A, Gharib B, Etminani A, Khavandgar S, Mani A, Dehpour AR. The involvement of nitric oxide in the antinociception induced by cyclosporine A in mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2002;72:267–72[ISI][Medline]
  34. Docherty RJ, Yeats JC, Bevan S, Boddeke HW. Inhibition of calcineurin inhibits the desensitization of capsaicin-evoked currents in cultured dorsal root ganglion neurones from adult rats. Pflugers Arch 1996;431:828–37[ISI][Medline]
  35. Mohapatra DP, Nau C. Regulation of Ca2+-dependent desensitization in the vanilloid receptor TRPV1 by calcineurin and cAMP-dependent protein kinase. J Biol Chem 2005;280:13424–32[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sato, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Seo, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sato, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Seo, N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pain Mechanisms
Right arrow Preclinical Pharmacology
Right arrow Pain
Right arrow Pharmacology


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press