JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Anesth Analg 2007; 105:1510-
© 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000287018.41611.7f
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Balakrishnan, G.
Right arrow Articles by Tepley, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Balakrishnan, G.
Right arrow Articles by Tepley, N.

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Effect of Propofol on Interictal Epileptiform Activity

Guruswamy Balakrishnan, MD, Kavita M. Grover, MD, Karen Mason, BS T, Brien Smith, MD, Gregory L. Barkley, MD, Susan M. Bowyer, PhD, and Norman Tepley, PhD

Department of Anesthesiology; Henry Ford Medical Group; Detroit, Michigan (Balakrishnan) Department of Neurology; Henry Ford Medical Group; Detroit, Michigan (Grover, Mason) Department of Neurology; Henry Ford Medical Group; Detroit, Michigan; Department of Neurology; Wayne State University; Detroit, Michigan; sbowyer1{at}hfhs.org (Smith, Barkley, Bowyer) Department of Neurology; Henry Ford Medical Group; Detroit, Michigan; Department of Physics; Oakland University; Rochester, Michigan (Tepley)

In Response:

As Meyer et al. (1) indicate, our study (2) was not designed to determine whether anesthesia increases or decreases detection of interictal epileptiform discharges because our patients only had magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings performed during anesthesia. Rather we wanted to determine whether anesthesia changed the proportion of MEG studies with successful detection of interictal epileptiform discharges when compared with MEG studies performed on nonsedated patients. As we indicated in the discussion, the best way to determine the effects of anesthesia would be to do two studies on the same patient, one study with anesthesia and one without. As the patient population we studied under anesthesia was chosen solely because they were unable to lie still, we compared these patients recorded under anesthesia to a larger population of nonsedated patients with epilepsy of all ages as well as a subgroup of children with epilepsy and found that the results in each group were similar. We found successful detection of interictal epileptiform activity in 71% of the patients who received general anesthesia compared to 80% success where no anesthesia was used. We concur that future studies of anesthesia effects on MEG or electroencephalogram recordings should document brain activity patterns relative to induction, maintenance, or withdrawal of the anesthetic agent(s). It is well known that the abrupt withdrawal of anticonvulsant drugs increases seizures and spiking rates. This is the basis of the methohexital suppression test, which occasionally is used as a diagnostic test in the evaluation of patients for epilepsy surgery.

We would also like to thank Meyer et al. for drawing our attention to a typographic error in the dosing of propofol in our article. On page 1494, the dose of propofol should read 50–150 µg · kg–1 · min–1. We apologize for not noticing this earlier.

REFERENCES

  1. Meyer S, Shamdeen G, Gottschling S, Gortner L, Grundmann U. Effect of propofol on interictal epileptiform activity. Anesth Anal 2007;105:1510[Free Full Text]
  2. Balakrishnan G, Grover KM, Mason KM, Smith BJ, Barkley GL, Tepley N, Bowyer SM. A retrospective analysis of the effect of general anesthetics on the successful detection of interictal epileptiform activity in magnetoencephalography. Anesth Anal 2007;104:1493–7[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. Balakrishnan, K. M. Grover, K. Mason, B. Smith, G. L. Barkley, S. M. Bowyer, and N. Tepley
Effect of Propofol on Interictal Epileptiform Activity
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2007; 105(5): 1510 - 1510.
[Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Balakrishnan, G.
Right arrow Articles by Tepley, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Balakrishnan, G.
Right arrow Articles by Tepley, N.

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press