JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 2008; 106:347-348
© 2008 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000297282.34649.dc
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kofke, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Blissitt, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kofke, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Blissitt, P. A.


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Section Editor:
Lawrence Saidman

Remifentanil-Induced Cerebral Blood Flow Effects

W. Andrew Kofke, MD, MBA FCCM, John A. Detre, MD, Jiongjiong Wang, PhD, and Patricia A. Blissitt, RN, M.S.N., PhD, CCRN, CNRN, CCM, APRN, BC

Professor, Director of Neuroanesthesia; Co-Director Neurocritical Care; Departments of Anesthesia and Neurosurgery; University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia, PA; kofkea{at}uphs.upenn.edu (Kofke) Associate Professor; Departments of Neurology and Radiology; Director, Center for Functional Neuroimaging; University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia, PA (Detre) Research Assistant Professor; Departments of Neurology and Radiology; University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia, PA (Wang) Staff Nurse, Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit; Duke University Hospital; Durham, NC (Blissitt)

In Response:

Pattinson et al.1 and Ramani2 raise interesting methodological issues that should be useful for future investigators doing similar research on anesthetics and other drugs which may alter Paco2 and thus confound evaluation of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) changes.

In our report,3 we found widespread increases in rCBF with increasing remifentanil dose, but also noted a significant increase in Paco2 with remifentanil. There are published guidelines on normal rCBF response to changes in Paco2. However, concerned that such correction factors may not apply to humans receiving remifentanil and that they may not apply homogeneously across the brain, we rejected that approach. Rather, we chose to normalize the cerebral blood flow (CBF) measures by dividing each rCBF region of interest by global CBF. This takes into account some of the aforementioned issues, but not all, as detailed in our report. Nonetheless, this approach did allow us to ascertain some regional effects of remifentanil on rCBF. Notably, in a similar human remifentanil study by Wagner et al.4 using positron emission tomography, they chose to deal with the CO2 issue by coaching subjects to breathe more as the remifentanil depressed breathing, producing a rather flat CO2 change with increasing doses. This produced other potential issues but they clearly addressed the issue of remifentanil-induced hypercapnea. Notably, they also observed an element of limbic system activation from sedative dose remifentanil in humans.

Pattinson et al.1 suggest that administering CO2 to the subjects separate from remifentanil administration would have solved the problem. Indeed, their suggestion would allow generation of regional CO2 reactivity maps, specific to the individual patient which could be used for a voxel-by-voxel correction for CO2 effect. We agree that such an approach would have been a meaningful improvement, particularly with respect to possible regional variations in CO2 reactivity, and should be considered in future similar studies. However, we suggest two caveats leading to caution in fully embracing this approach. The first is the assumption that the CO2 response will be unchanged by the drug being evaluated. The second is that the logistics of doing the CO2 reactivity map could be problematic. Is the CO2 administered in the same setting? If so does this produce any sensations of anxiety or dyspnea that may impact on subsequent tests? Is the CO2 given in a separate session producing other issues in reproducibility?

Dr. Ramani suggests that the BOLD fMRI technique should be employed concurrently with the arterial spin labeling rCBF technique.2 He suggests that it is little affected by changes in Paco2. This is a puzzling statement to us given previous reports that hypercapnea does affect BOLD measures.5,6 BOLD contrast reflects a complex interaction between CBF, cerebral blood volume, and oxygen utilization. Thus, the suggestion to combine arterial spin labeling rCBF studies with BOLD is potentially useful for future studies, as also suggested by Davis et al.5 Such an approach could help separate metabolically induced flow increases from those due solely to CO2 changes. Thus and although perhaps for different reasons, we welcome Ramani’s suggestion and agree that it could be a meaningful improvement to the methods we employed.

REFERENCES

  1. Pattinson KTS, Rogers R, Mayhew SD, MacIntosh BJ, Lee MC, Wise RG. Remifentanil-induced cerebral blood flow effects in normal humans: dose and ApoE genotype. Anesth Analg 2008;106:347[Free Full Text]
  2. Ramani R. Remifentanil-induced cerebral blood flow effects. Anesth Analg 2008; 106:347[Free Full Text]
  3. Kofke WA, Blissitt PA, Rao H, Wang J, Addya K, Detre J. Remifentanil-induced cerebral blood flow effects in normal humans: dose and ApoE genotype. Anesth Analg 2007;105:167–75[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Wagner KJ, Willoch F, Kochs EF, Siessmeier T, Tölle TR, Schwaiger M, Bartenstein P. Dose-dependent regional cerebral blood flow changes during remifentanil infusion in humans: a positron emission tomography study. Anesthesiology 2001;94: 732–9[Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Davis TL, Kwong KK, Weisskoff RM, Rosen BR. Calibrated functional MRI: mapping the dynamics of oxidative metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:1834–9[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Lythgoe DJ, Williams SC, Cullinane M, Markus HS. Mapping of cerebrovascular reactivity using BOLD magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1999;17:495–502[Web of Science][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kofke, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Blissitt, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kofke, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Blissitt, P. A.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2008 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press