| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cardiac tamponade is a clinical diagnosis based on signs (e.g., jugular venous distension, tachycardia, pulsus paradoxus, and hypotension) and symptoms (e.g., chest discomfort, tachypnea, exertional dyspnea, and episodes of unconsciousness). Echocardiography can readily demonstrate the pathophysiology underlying these clinical findings and may prove valuable in confirming this diagnosis.1 First, two-dimensional echocardiography identifies morphological features, in addition to pericardial effusion. Right atrial collapse is a specific finding if it lasts more than one-third of the cardiac cycle (from late diastole to early systole), whereas right ventricular collapse during early diastole and left atrial collapse are more highly specific but low sensitivity findings.2 Posttraumatic pericardial effusion may result in deposition of clot, which may loculate and exert pressure on one or more of the cardiac chambers. These changes are more likely to occur when respective chamber pressures temporarily decrease to less than the pericardial pressure. Furthermore, paradoxical septal motion with respiration, dilated IVC and hepatic veins with lack of inspiratory collapse, and a "swinging" heart can be observed. In the present case, increased left ventricle diastolic wall thickness in cardiac tamponade was seen, representing the characteristic feature of "pseudohypertrophy"2; (please see video clip available at www.anesthesia-analgesia.org). Second, Doppler echocardiographic findings of cardiac tamponade are based on alterations of intrathoracic and intracardiac pressures that occur during respiration, and reflect clinical severity. In patients with cardiac tamponade, significant pericardial effusion blunts the transmission of intrathoracic pressure. During spontaneous inspiration, intrathoracic pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure decrease, whereas intracardiac pressure remains unchanged. A decrease in pressure gradient thus results in diminished diastolic pulmonary venous and transmitral valve Doppler flow velocities during spontaneous inspiration, subsequently facilitating right ventricular filling by enhanced ventricular interdependence (e.g., increased transtricuspid valve flow and hepatic venous flow toward the IVC). Opposite changes are observed on spontaneous expiration. These respiratory changes in Doppler flow velocities are reversed if the patient is receiving positive pressure ventilation. In this case, findings of pronounced fluctuation in transtricuspid and transmitral flow, paradoxical septal motion with respiration and dilated IVC and hepatic veins were not observed, mainly because the patient was under cardiopulmonary bypass. Acute traumatic pericardial effusion can impair cardiac performance and induce cardiac tamponade with even 50 mL of localized pericardial fluid, whereas circumferential chronic pericardial effusion generally has low pressure without the symptoms of cardiac tamponade or echocardiographic findings mentioned above.3 Briefly, the rate of fluid accumulation relative to pericardial stretch and efficacy of compensatory neurohormonal mechanisms has an impact on the symptoms of cardiac tamponade. Patients with pericardial effusion along with no characteristic hemodynamic and echocardiographic findings are thus not diagnosed with cardiac tamponade. In this regard, patients with constrictive pericarditis have cardiac tamponade-like hemodynamics and Doppler echocardiographic findings. A previous report documented that cardiac tamponade as a complication of catheter-based procedures is rescued by urgent pericardiocentesis alone in 82% of cases, whereas large pericardial thrombus and sustained massive pericardial effusion, despite extended pericardiocentesis, necessitate surgical intervention.4 TEE has the advantage of being able to diagnose intrapericardial clot and loculated pericardial effusion compared to TTE. TEE should thus be considered when TTE does not offer adequate information about the presence of pericardial effusion or evaluation of hemodynamic impact. The present case demonstrates the efficacy of TEE in evaluating iatrogenic cardiac tamponade.
Footnotes Accepted for publication September 4, 2007. REFERENCES
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|