JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 2008; 106:669-
© 2008 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181619777
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khan, Z. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Khan, Z. H.


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Section Editor:
Lawrence Saidman

The Upper Lip Bite Test to Predict Difficult Intubation

Zahid Hussain Khan, MD

Department of Anesthesiology; Imam Khomeini Medical Center; School of Medicine, Medical Sciences/ University of Tehran; Keshavarz Blvd, Tehran 14197, Iran; khanhzh51{at}yahoo.com

In Response:

Regarding Tong et al.'s1 referral to Figure 2 in our article,2 obliteration of the lower lip has never been cited as an essential requirement in performing the Mallampati test as described by Mallampati et al.,3 and later as modified by Samsoon et al.4 The tongue can lie well within the oral cavity and fall short of obliterating the lower lip despite a maximal effort on the part of the patient. Our patient had a tongue tie and was unable to protrude the tongue maximally. We do agree with Tong et al. that single screening tests should be avoided to curtail the chances of low predictive values. Finally, "forward movement of the mandible according to the position of the lower incisors in relation to the upper incisors" has been discussed in our original study.5

We agree with Dr. Rosenblatt6 and should have provided evidence confirming our assertion that the patient's trachea was easily intubated. Unfortunately, a picture of the laryngeal view was not taken to demonstrate to the readers that the glottic view was easily obtained at the first attempt, within 20 s, and graded as 1 according to Cormack and Lehane's grading system.7

Finally, although we provided a guarded opinion about prediction of laryngoscopy in such potentially difficult cases as the one we reported taking into consideration the possibility that our management could have resulted in a "can't intubate, ventilate or oxygenate situation," we do agree with each author1,6,8 that the safest approach should have been awake tracheal intubation preferably utilizing a fiberscope.

REFERENCES

  1. Tong JL, Gait AJ. The upper lip bite test to predict difficult intubation. Anesth Analg 2008;106:668–9[Free Full Text]
  2. Khan ZH, Gharabaghian M, Nilli F, Ghiamat M, Mohammadi M. Easy endotracheal intubation of a patient suffering from both Cushing's and Nelson's syndromes predicted by the upper lip bite test despite a Mallampati class 4 airway. Anesth Analg 2007;105:786–7[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Mallampati SR, Gatt SP, Gugino LD, Desai SP, Waraksa B, Freiberger D, Liu PL. A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study. Can Anaesth Soc J 1985;32:429–34[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Samsoon GLT, Young JRB. Difficult tracheal intubation: a retrospective study. Anaesthesia 1987;42:487–90[Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Khan ZH, Kashfi A, Ebrahimkhani E. A comparison of the upper lip bite test (a simple new technique) with modified Mallampati classification in predicting difficulty in endotracheal intubation: a prospective blinded study. Anesth Analg 2003;96:595–9[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Rosenblatt WH. Interesting anecdotes cannot validate test results. Anesth Analg 2008;106:668[Free Full Text]
  7. Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia 1984; 39:1105–11[Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Law JA. Relying on just a few predictors of easy airway management may bite back! Anesth Analg 2008;106:668[Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Law Med EthicsHome page
R. C. Tait
Vulnerability in clinical research with patients in pain: a risk analysis.
J. Law Med. Ethics, March 1, 2009; 37(1): 59 - 72.
[PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. H. Johnson
Fitness of Patients in Pain to Make Optimal Decisions
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2008; 106(2): 670 - 670.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. Dick
Fitness of Patients in Pain to Make Optimal Decisions
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2008; 106(2): 669 - 670.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khan, Z. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Khan, Z. H.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2008 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press