JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 2008; 106:678-
© 2008 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318161979d
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anwari, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anwari, J. S.


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Section Editor:
Lawrence Saidman

Pain Management: Citizenship or Human Right?

Jamil S. Anwari, FFARCS

Riyadh Military Hospital; Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; janwari{at}hotmail.com

To the Editor:

I congratulate Brennnan et al.1 for surveying the worldwide efforts to improve pain management. Promoting pain management as a basic human right is highly commendable for it has been an issue long kept in the dark. However, the international pain management efforts described in the survey delineate the rights for citizens of Western nations as opposed to those worldwide. Alas, one of the accompanying editorials highlights issues related to the health system of a single country.2

Global efforts to improve health standards in the Third World are mostly restricted to covenants, reports, and declarations by vocal yet powerless organizations. As Brennan et al. point out, the massive resource discrepancy between need and availability is the greatest challenge limiting the fulfillment of pain management as a universal human right. At the same time, the authors have not provided a solution to this problem. Are we not morally obligated to distribute available resources more fairly and, if not, what options remain? Perhaps leading developed nations (G-8) must assume the role of benefactor in addressing the relief of pain as a fundamental human right.

I suggest that ethical behavior is the most important criterion for relieving human suffering. Through ethics, not only in science but also in other fields (such as economics, politics, law, etc.), a solution to uphold and safeguard human rights, including the right to be pain free, could be comprehensively sought. In the present time of moral crisis, I am delighted by Fishman's remark about returning medicine to its humanistic roots.2

REFERENCES

  1. Brennan F, Carr DB, Cousins M. Pain management: a fundamental human right. Anesth Analg 2007;105:205–21[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Fishman SM. Recognizing pain management as a human right: a first step. Anesth Analg 2007;105:8–9[Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anwari, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anwari, J. S.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2008 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press