JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 2008; 106:1019-
© 2008 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816322e0
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Windokun, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Windokun, A.


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Section Editor:
Lawrence Saidman

Database Analysis of Atypical Drug Transactions

Adejare Windokun, MBBS, PGDA

Department of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia; The Cleveland Clinic; Cleveland, Ohio; jare{at}windokun.net

To the Editor:

Epstein et al.1 suggest that screening methods may prevent diversion of controlled substances. In hospitals that use an anesthesia information management system (AIMS), anesthesiologists recognize that obvious diversion of drugs can lead to an immediate inquiry. Anesthesiologists intent on diverting medications may record a larger amount of medication than was actually administered and thus avoid discrepancies in both the anesthetic and medication record. This may result in a reduction in the number of errors documented in an AIMS, but not necessarily signify a reduction in actual diversion. It is therefore, not surprising, that the authors have not been able to identify any diversion in 8 mo.

Because the consequences of certain behaviors may be noteworthy, the effect of this analysis on patient care should be noted. For example, anesthesiologists could conceivably administer the mean doses of narcotics rather than the dose required by the patient so as not be an outlier. Alternatively, the anesthesiologist may be more likely to administer full doses of narcotics so as not to have to document any wastage. The authors, by not enumerating other methods of diversion for fear of providing insight to those diverting drugs, are missing the point that such individuals have a much stronger motivation to discover new ways to divert drugs.

REFERENCE

  1. Epstein RH, Gratch DM, Grunwald Z. Development of a scheduled drug diversion surveillance system based on an analysis of atypical drug transactions. Anesth Analg 2007;105:1053–60[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Windokun, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Windokun, A.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2008 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press