JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 2008; 106:884-887
© 2008 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318164f153
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Al-Rawi, O. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Russell, G. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Al-Rawi, O. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Russell, G. N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mechanisms
Right arrow Anesthetic Techniques
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia
Right arrow Pharmacology


CRITICAL CARE AND TRAUMA

Section Editor:
Jukka Takala

The Effect of Thoracic Epidural Bupivacaine and an Intravenous Adrenaline Infusion on Gastric Tube Blood Flow During Esophagectomy

Omar Y. Al-Rawi, FRCA*, Stephen H. Pennefather, MRCP, FRCA*, Richard D. Page, FRCS{dagger}, Ishani Dave, FRCA*, and Glen N. Russell, FRCA*

From the Departments of *Anaesthesia and {dagger}Thoracic Surgery, Cardiothoracic Centre, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Address correspondence to Stephen H. Pennefather, MRCP, FRCA, Department of Anaesthesia, Cardiothoracic Centre, Thomas Drive, Liverpool L14 3PE, UK. Address e-mail to stephen.pennefather{at}ctc.nhs.uk.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
BACKGROUND: Gastric tube necrosis is a major cause of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. A correlation has been shown between reduced flux at the anastomotic end of the gastric tube and anastomotic leaks.

METHODS: We prospectively studied the effect of intraoperative thoracic epidural bupivacaine and subsequent adrenaline infusion on hemodynamics and flux in the gastric tube.

RESULTS: Administering the epidural bolus significantly decreased flux at the anastomotic end of the gastric tube (P < 0.01). Gastric flux was returned to baseline by an adrenaline infusion.

CONCLUSIONS: The administration of a thoracic epidural bolus may decrease flux at the anastomotic end of the gastric tube.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Anastomotic leakage is a major cause of mortality after esophagectomy.1–3 Patients usually undergo an esophageal resection with immediate reconstruction using tubularized stomach based on a blood supply from the right gastroepiploic artery; the left gastric, left gastroepiploic, and short gastric arteries are divided. The anastomotic end of this newly formed gastric tube is vascularized by an intramural plexus of vessels supplied from branches of the right gastroepiploic artery. Ischemia of the anastomotic end of this gastric tube is a major cause of anastomotic leaks.4,5

Laser Doppler flowmetry was introduced in 1972.6 The technique has been validated against other methods of measuring tissue blood flow7–9 and is an established method of measuring gastric blood flow.10

Thoracic epidurals containing a mixture of local anesthetics and opioids are widely used to provide analgesia for patients undergoing esophagectomy. The effect of thoracic epidurals on blood flow in the newly fashioned gastric tube is unknown. Vasodilatation from an epidural-induced sympathetic block to the stomach (T6–10)11 may increase blood flow to the gastric tube. Conversely, epidural-induced hypotension may decrease gastric tube blood flow. The aims of this study were to determine the effect of a thoracic epidural and subsequent IV adrenaline infusion on blood flow in the newly formed gastric tube.


    METHODS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
With local research ethics committee approval and written informed consent, adult patients consecutively scheduled to undergo an esophagectomy and receive thoracic epidural analgesia for postoperative analgesia were recruited for the study. Patients with a contraindication to epidural analgesia, patients with a history of ischemic heart disease, and patients receiving β-blockers or other antihypertensive medications were excluded from the study.

Patients were premedicated with diazepam. On arrival in the anesthetic room, arterial and venous cannulae and a midthoracic epidural catheter were inserted under local anesthesia. No epidural test dose was administered. After administration of oxygen, anesthesia was induced with fentanyl and propofol. Placement of an appropriate-sized double-lumen endobronchial tube was facilitated by succinylcholine. Anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane in an oxygen/air mixture. Neuromuscular blockade was maintained by intermittent boluses of atracurium. Patients’ lungs were ventilated to normocapnea. Before being placed in a lateral position, patients received a central venous catheter and a study pulmonary artery catheter via the left internal jugular vein. Fluid management was standardized. Warmed lactated Ringer's solution was administered at 10 mL · kg–1 · h–1. Blood loss was replaced with colloid if the hemoglobin concentration was >8 g/dL, or with allogeneic blood if the hemoglobin concentration was <8 g/dL.

All resections were performed via a left thoracoabdominal sixth intercostal space incision. The tumor was resected en-bloc with adjacent tissue, including lymph nodes. After construction of a gastric tube based on a blood supply from the right gastroepiploic artery, laser Doppler flow probes (DP8C, Moor Instruments, Axminister, UK) were sutured to the serosal surface of the anastomotic and pyloric end of the tubularized stomach (Fig. 1). The flow probes were attached to a laser Doppler monitor (DRT4, Moor Instruments). Data from the laser Doppler monitor were archived to an attached computer. After the tubularized stomach was covered with a damp swab, surgery was stopped for the duration of the study.


Figure 130
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Formation of the gastric tube. A = anastomotic end, P = pyloric end, dotted line represents resection line.

 

Data were collected during three 5-min study periods. The baseline study period commenced when patients had been hemodynamically stable for 10 min. The laser Doppler flux trace was marked, pulmonary artery wedge pressure was measured, and three thermodilutional cardiac output measurements were averaged. Standard hemodynamic variables were calculated. After 5 min, the flow trace was re-marked, cardiac outputs were remeasured, and hemodynamic variables recalculated.

Patients then received a 0.1 mL/kg bolus of epidural 0.25% bupivacaine, a dose higher than usually used in clinical practice. The second study stage commenced when the systolic arterial blood pressure had decreased by 30% (30 min after the epidural bolus). During the second 5-min study period, the laser Doppler flux trace was marked and hemodynamic measurements were made as described above. At the end of the second study period, patients received an IV infusion of adrenaline titrated to achieve baseline arterial blood pressure. When baseline arterial blood pressure had been achieved, or our predetermined maximum adrenaline infusion rate of 400 µg/h was reached, the third 5-min study period started. After all measurements had been taken, the Doppler flux probes were removed and the surgery was completed.

Flux measurements acquired during each of the three 5-min study periods were averaged using MoorSoft for Windows/DRT4 version 1.2 (for DRT4 Monitor v5.02). The average of the hemodynamic values obtained at the start and the end of each study period was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft® Excel 2002. Nonparametric tests were used to analyze the data. The Friedman test was used to analyze the overall differences among the three study periods. In case of significant overall effects, changes were evaluated in detail with the Wilcoxon's signed rank test, to determine the significance of differences between baseline and epidural periods and between epidural and adrenaline periods.


    RESULTS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Twelve patients were recruited. One patient was excluded because surgery was unexpectedly difficult, and a second patient was excluded because the epidural was not sited at the midthoracic level. Demographic data for the 10 patients studied are summarized in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Demographic Data

 

To examine the effect of the epidural bolus, we compared the epidural and baseline periods. The administration of a thoracic epidural bolus resulted in a significant decrease in anastomotic flux (Table 2 and Fig. 2), a significant decrease in arterial blood pressure and cardiac index (Table 2), but no significant change in pyloric flux (Table 2 and Fig. 3). Comparing the epidural and adrenaline periods, the administration of an adrenaline infusion resulted in significant increases in anastomotic flux, pyloric flux, arterial blood pressure, and cardiac index (Table 2 and Figs. 2 and 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Flux and Hemodynamic Data

 

Figure 230
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Changes in flux at the anastomotic end of the gastric tube during the study.

 

Figure 330
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Changes in flux at the pyloric end of the gastric tube during the study.

 

The upper limit of the sensory block level was above T4 in all patients. The lower limit of the sensory block level was below T10 in all patients.


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
This study shows that, compared with the pyloric end, blood flow at the anastomotic end of the newly formed gastric tube is reduced (Table 2) and a thoracic epidural bupivacaine bolus further decreases this flow. Ischemia of the gastric tube is a major cause of anastomotic leaks.4,5 As a relationship has been shown between low blood flow at the anastomotic site, measured by laser Doppler, and subsequent anastomotic leak,12 this further reduction in gastric tube blood flow by a thoracic epidural may be clinically important.

In this study, epidural bupivacaine resulted in a significant decrease in cardiac output and arterial blood pressure, probably by blocking the cardiac sympathetics.13,14 We postulate that arterial blood pressure has a greater effect on blood flow through the plexus of vessels supplying the anastomotic end of the gastric tube than on the relatively undisturbed arterial blood supply to the pyloric end of the gastric tube.

We considered adrenaline as an appropriate drug to reverse the predicted thoracic epidural-induced decrease in cardiac output and arterial blood pressure. The effect of IV adrenaline on gastric tube perfusion has not been described. Our study demonstrated that an adrenaline infusion significantly increased blood flow at both ends of the newly formed gastric tube (Figs. 2 and 3). This study suggests that anesthesiologists should be cautious in accepting intraoperative hypotension secondary to epidural administration in patients undergoing esophagectomy.

Limitations of this study include small sample size and short study period. We are studying the effect of vasoconstrictors on blood flow in the gastric tube. In conclusion, the administration of a thoracic epidural bupivacaine bolus may decrease the flux at the anastomotic end of the gastric tube.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. S. Raftery, Anesthetic Department, Whiston Hospital, for statistical support and helpful discussion.


    Footnotes
 
Accepted for publication November 27, 2007.

Reprints will not be available from the author.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Tam PC, Fok M, Wong J. Reexploration for complications after esophagectomy for cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989;98:1122–7[Abstract]
  2. Lam TC, Fok M, Cheng SW, Wong J. Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy for cancer—a comparison of neck and chest anastomoses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;104:395–400[Abstract]
  3. Griffin SM, Lamb PJ, Dresner SM, Richardson DL, Hayes N. Diagnosis and management of a mediastinal leak following radical oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 2001;88:1346–51[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Urschel JD. Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review. Am J Surg 1995;169:634–40[Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Page RD, Shackcloth MJ, Russell GN, Pennefather SH. Surgical treatment of anastomotic leaks after oesophagectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;27:337–43[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Riva CE, Ross B, Benedek GB. Laser Doppler measurements of blood flow in capillary tubes and retinal arteries. Invest Ophthalmol 1972;119:36–44
  7. Shepherd AP, Riedel GL. Continuous measurement of intestinal mucosal blood flow by laser-Doppler velocimetry. Am J Physiol 1982;242:G668–72[Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Kvietys PR, Shepherd AP, Granger DN. Laser-Doppler, H2 clearance, and microsphere estimates of mucosal blood flow. Am J Physiol 1985;249:G221–7[Web of Science][Medline]
  9. Gana TJ, Huhlewych R, Koo J. Focal gastric mucosal blood flow by laser-Doppler and hydrogen gas clearance: a comparative study. J Surg Res 1987;43:337–43[Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Pierie JP, De Graaf PW, Poen H, Van der Tweel I, Obertop H. Impaired healing of cervical oesophagogastrostomies can be predicted by estimation of gastric serosal blood perfusion by laser Doppler flowmetry. Eur J Surg 1994;160:599–603[Web of Science][Medline]
  11. Bonica JJ. Autonomic innervation of the viscera in relation to nerve block. Anesthesiology 1968;29:793–813[Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Ikeda Y, Niimi M, Kan S, Shatari T, Takami H, Kodaira S. Clinical significance of tissue blood flow during esophagectomy by laser Doppler flowmetry. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;122:1101–6[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Otton PE, Wilson EJ. The cardiocirculatory effects of upper thoracic epidural analgesia. Can Anaesth Soc J 1966;13:541–9[Medline]
  14. Sundberg A, Wattwil M, Wiklund L. Hemodynamic effects of intravenous bupivacaine during high thoracic epidural anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1987:31;143–7[Web of Science][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Al-Rawi, O. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Russell, G. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Al-Rawi, O. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Russell, G. N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mechanisms
Right arrow Anesthetic Techniques
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia
Right arrow Pharmacology


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2008 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press