JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Anesth Analg 2008; 106:1587-
© 2008 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816a1ba0
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evron, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ezri, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Evron, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ezri, T.

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Section Editor:
Lawrence Saidman

The Use of Lidocaine for Spinal Anesthesia

Shmuel Evron, MD, and Tiberiu Ezri, MD

Department of Anesthesia; Wolfson Medical Center; Holon, Israel; tezri{at}netvision.net.il

In Response:

Dr. Neustein1 raises important concerns regarding the use of lidocaine for spinal anesthesia. The increasing number of day surgery cases requires availability of a short-acting, yet safe, local anesthetic if spinal anesthesia is employed in outpatients and no one drug meets all requirements. For example, bupivacaine may be less suitable for day surgery procedures because of its greater failure rate, prolonged effect,2 and reportedly greater incidence of urinary retention, and chlorprocaine is not approved for use in spinal anesthesia.

Small-dose spinal lidocaine (15 mg), combined with 10 µg sufentanil, is associated with a very low incidence of transient neurological symptoms (TNS).3 In the consenting process, our patients were informed of the advantages and disadvantages of local anesthetics, including the incidence of TNS with different local anesthetics and different needles.

As we explained in the manuscript, for ethical reasons, the study was not completed because of the high incidence of TNS.

In conclusion, we do not believe that the intrathecal administration of lidocaine should be abandoned, but rather the injection technique and dosage should be improved, as suggested by our and other studies.4,5

REFERENCES

  1. Neustein SM. The use of lidocaine for spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2008;106:1586–7[Free Full Text]
  2. Carron M, Freo U, Veronese S, Innocente F, Ori C. Spinal block with 1.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine: not successful for everyone. Anesth Analg 2007;105:1515–6[Free Full Text]
  3. Waxler B, Mondragon SA, Patel SN, Nedumgottil K. Intrathecal lidocaine and sufentanil shorten postoperative recovery after outpatient rectal surgery. Can J Anaesth 2004;51:680–4[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Evron S, Gurstieva V, Ezri T, Gladkov V, Shopin S, Herman A, Sidi A, Weitzman S. Transient neurological symptoms after isobaric subarachnoid anesthesia with 2% lidocaine: the impact of needle type. Anesth Analg 2007;105:1494–9[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Drasner K. Local anesthetic neurotoxicity. Clinical injury and strategies that may minimize risk. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2002;27:576–80[Web of Science][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
D. D. Glass and A. D. Sessler
Education in Anesthesiology Should Be Evidenced-Based
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2008; 106(5): 1588 - 1588.
[Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evron, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ezri, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Evron, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ezri, T.

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press