JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 2008; 107:726-
© 2008 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31817b67b1
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Macfarlane, A. J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Brull, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Macfarlane, A. J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Brull, R.


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Section Editor:
Lawrence Saidmanm

Continuous Interscalene Block for Open Shoulder Surgery

Alan J. R. Macfarlane, BSc, MB ChB, MRCP, FRCA, and Richard Brull, MD, FRCPC

Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management; Toronto Western Hospital; University of Toronto; Toronto, Canada; a_m_macfarlane{at}hotmail.com

To the Editor:

Hofmann-Kiefer et al.1 recently confirmed that continuous patient controlled interscalene block (PCISB) can reduce pain after open shoulder surgery compared with IV patient controlled analgesia. In contrast, however, to previous work by Ilfeld2 and Capdevila,3 functional ability was not improved. Admittedly, the types of shoulder surgery and outcome measures were different between the studies, but we question whether the quality of the block in Hofmann-Kiefer’s study contributed to their equivocal result. Despite reporting a zero incidence of incomplete blocks preoperatively, the mean dose of intraoperative fentanyl required in the PCISB group was curiously large (260 µg). In addition, a significant proportion of patients in the PCISB group were not analyzed either because of catheter dislocation or removal, or postoperative dyspnea. Combined with the fact that certain investigators were unblinded, the lack of "intention to treat" analysis may have skewed results in favor of the PCISB group. The rate of catheter dislodgement reported in Hofmann-Kiefer’s study (approximately 20%) is unacceptably high and could likely have been reduced by tunneling4 or using glue.5 Further investigation is required to confirm whether or not PCISB can confer early functional improvement and, importantly, whether this actually translates into long-term benefit.

REFERENCES

  1. Hofmann-Kiefer K, Eiser T, Chappell D, Leuschner S, Conzen P, Schwender D. Does patient-controlled interscalene block improve early functional rehabilitation after open shoulder surgery. Anesth Analg 2008;106:991–6[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Ilfeld BM, Vandenborne K, Duncan PW, Sessler DI, Enneking FK, Shuster JJ, Theriaque DW, Chmielewski TL, Spadoni EH, Wright TW. Ambulatory continuous interscalene nerve blocks decrease the time to discharge readiness after total shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized, triple-masked, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology 2006;105:999–1007[Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Capdevila X, Dadure C, Bringuier S, Bernard N, Biboulet P, Gaertner E, Macaire P. Effect of patient-controlled perineural analgesia on rehabilitation and pain after ambulatory orthopedic surgery: a multicenter randomized trial. Anesthesiology 2006;105:566–73[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Ekatodramis G, Borgeat A. Subcutaneous tunnelling of the interscalene catheter. Can J Anaesth 2000;47:716–17[Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Bloc S, Garnier T, Mercidal L, Roy M, Dhonneur G. Evaluation of synthetic glue for the fixation of continuous peripheral nerve catheters. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2008;1:103–5



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
K. F. Hofmann-Kiefer, T. Eiser, D. Chappell, S. Leuschner, P. Conzen, and D. Schwender
Continuous Interscalene Block for Open Shoulder Surgery
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2008; 107(2): 726 - 727.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Macfarlane, A. J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Brull, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Macfarlane, A. J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Brull, R.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2008 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press