JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 2008; 107:1085-1086
© 2008 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31817e038b
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chiron, B.
Right arrow Articles by Laffon, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chiron, B.
Right arrow Articles by Laffon, M.


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Section Editor:
Lawrence Saidman

Editor's note: Due to a publisher's error, the following response by Amar et al. to the Letter to the Editor by Lohser and Brodsky published in the July 2008 issue (Anesth Analg 2008;107:342) was left out of the July issue. The publisher apologizes for the error.

Difficult Removal of an Arrow Flextip PlusTM Epidural Catheter

Bruno Chiron, MD, Thibaud Mariaux de Serres, Jacques Fusciardi, MD, and Marc Laffon, MD, PhD

Service d'anesthésie ambulatoire, CH de Blois, France (Chiron) Groupement d'anesthésie-réanimation, CHRU de Tours; Université François Rabelais, France; b.chiron{at}voila.fr (Mariaux de Serres, Fusciardi, Laffon)

To the Editor:

We report the inability to remove a wire reinforced epidural catheter and the proposed mechanism after epidural analgesia for labor. Epidural analgesia was performed in a patient in the right lateral position. A 19-gauge Arrow FlexTip PlusTM epidural catheter was inserted without difficulty and accompanied by satisfactory analgesia. Two hours after delivery, an attempt to remove the catheter was unsuccessful. With the patient in the sitting position, and flexing her back, a second attempt at catheter removal was also unsuccessful, and an radiograph performed after injecting contrast into the catheter showed a simple loop in the catheter (Fig. 1). A third attempt to remove the catheter with the patient in the lateral position (initial position during the epidural puncture) was then successful. The catheter is composed of a spiral metal coil coated with a polyurethane sleeve but at the distal end the metal spiral is more flexible, which can explain the formation of a loop hindering removal1,2 (Fig. 2). Our report suggests that in this situation simple measures, previously cited: wait several hours to allow an optimal muscular relaxation in postpartum,3 withdrawing the catheter with the patient in position used during the epidural puncture or in lateral position because the forces necessary to withdraw a catheter were 2.5 less than in sitting position4,5 and injection of 3 mL of saline followed by a careful continuous traction6 might facilitate catheter removal.


Figure 171
View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Simple loop on the Arrow FlexTip PlusTM.

 

Figure 271
View larger version (154K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Structurally more flexible area of the catheter Arrow FlexTip PlusTM.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Banwell BR, Morley-Forster P, Krause R. Decreased incidence of complications in parturients with the arrow (Flex Tip Plus) epidural catheter. Can J Anaesth 1998; 45:370–2[Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Hopf H-B, Leischik M. More on problems with removing the arrow Flex Tip Epidural catheter: smooth in hardly out? Anesthesiology 2000;93:1362[Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Pierre HL, Block BM, Wu CL. Difficult removal of a wire-reinforced epidural catheter. J Clin Anesth 2003;15:140–1[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Boey S, Carrie L. Withdrawal forces during removal of lumbar extradural catheters. Br J Anaesth 1994;73:833–5[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Morris GN, Warren BB, Hanson EW, Mazzeo FJ, DiBenedetto DJ. Influence of patient position on withdrawal forces during removal of lumbar extradural catheters. Br J Anaesthesia 1996;77:419–20[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Day C. Difficult removal of an epidural catheter. Anaesthesia 1993;48:448[Web of Science][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chiron, B.
Right arrow Articles by Laffon, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chiron, B.
Right arrow Articles by Laffon, M.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2008 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press