JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 2008; 107:1756-
© 2008 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318187ac2f
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Vender, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Vender, J. S.


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Residual Neuromuscular Block and Adverse Respiratory Events

Glenn S. Murphy, MD, Joseph W. Szokol, MD, Jesse H. Marymont, MD, Steven B. Greenberg, MD, Michael J. Avram, PhD, and Jeffery S. Vender, MD

Department of Anesthesiology; Evanston Northwestern Healthcare; Evanston, Illinois; dgmurphy2{at}yahoo.com

In Response:

Dr. Kopman's response to our investigation highlights several important issues related to residual neuromuscular blockade.1 First, we agree that many clinicians do not perceive postoperative residual paresis as a clinical problem. Recent surveys have demonstrated that many anesthesiologists do not routinely use techniques that have been proven to reduce the incidence of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade.2,3 Second, we also agree that residual neuromuscular blockade (a train-of-four (TOF) ratio <0.9) was likely present in a number of patients without obvious respiratory symptoms. If we assume that our control group represented the study population as a whole (9.5% with TOF ratios between 0.7 and 0.9), then 708 patients would have had evidence of incomplete neuromuscular recovery in the postanesthesia care unit. Since only 61 patients had critical respiratory events, this estimation suggests that the majority (91%) of patients with residual neuromuscular blockade did not develop severe respiratory symptoms in the postanesthesia care unit. However, it is possible that more subtle respiratory events that were not measured in the study occurred in these patients with lesser degrees of muscle weakness. Furthermore, nearly three-quarters of the critical respiratory events were observed in patients with severe residual blockade (TOF ratios <0.7). Our findings suggest that the risk of critical respiratory events is more likely when more severe residual paresis is present. However, these events may still be observed in patients with less significant degrees of residual block (16.7% of the respiratory events were observed in patients with TOF ratios between 0.7 and 0.9). Finally, we agree that clinicians should not accept even infrequent adverse events if they can be prevented. We hope that our findings will make clinicians more aware of the hazards of incomplete neuromuscular recovery in the immediate postoperative period.

REFERENCES

  1. Kopman AF. Residual neuromuscular block and adverse respiratory events. Anesth Analg 2008;1756
  2. Greyling M, Sweeney BP. Recovery from neuromuscular blockade: a survey of practice. Anaesthesia 2007;62:806–9[Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Vender JS, Marymont JH, Avram MJ. The use of neuromuscular blocking drugs in adult cardiac surgery: results of a national postal survey. Anesth Analg 2002;95:1534–9[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Vender, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Vender, J. S.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2008 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press