JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (41)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soonthon-Brant, V.
Right arrow Articles by Watson, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soonthon-Brant, V.
Right arrow Articles by Watson, M.

Anesth Analg 1999;88:49-55
© 1999 International Anesthesia Research Society


NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIA

Fentanyl Does Not Increase Brain Injury After Focal Cerebral Ischemia in Rats

Vanna Soonthon-Brant, MD*, Piyush M. Patel, MD, FRCPC*, John C. Drummond, MD, FRCPC*, Daniel J. Cole, MD{dagger}, Paul J. Kelly, BS*, and Mary Watson, BS*

Departments of Anesthesiology *University of California, San Diego and Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Diego; and {dagger}Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Piyush M. Patel, Department of Anesthesiology, Anesthesia Service 9125, VA Medical Center, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr., San Diego, CA 92161. Address e-mail to ppatel{at}ucsd.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Recent reports have indicated that large-dose opiate anesthesia can increase neuronal injury in rats subjected to forebrain ischemia. However, most episodes of cerebral ischemia in the operating room setting are focal in nature, and the influence of large-dose opioid administration on the tolerance of the brain to focal cerebral ischemia has not been studied. Accordingly, we undertook the present study to evaluate the effect of fentanyl administration on outcome after focal cerebral ischemia. Three groups of fasted Wistar-Kyoto rats (awake, fentanyl, and isoflurane groups; n = 20 per group) were anesthetized with isoflurane (2.5% end-tidal). Pericranial temperature was servocontrolled at 37.0°C. After surgical preparation fentanyl 50 µg/kg was administered IV over 10 min in the fentanyl group. Thereafter, an infusion was established at a rate of 50 µg · kg–1 · h–1. The end-tidal concentration of isoflurane was then reduced to 1.1%, one minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (1 MAC) in all groups. Occlusion of the middle cerebral artery was achieved by advancing a 0.25-mm filament into the anterior cerebral artery via the common carotid artery. In the fentanyl and awake groups, isoflurane administration was then discontinued. In the isoflurane group, isoflurane anesthesia was maintained at 1.0 MAC. After 90 min of focal ischemia, the filament was removed, and the animals were allowed to recover. Seven days later, the volume of cerebral infarction in the animals was determined by image analysis of hematoxylin and eosin-stained coronal brain sections. There was no difference in the infarct volume between the fentanyl and awake groups. The infarct volume was the least in the isoflurane group. The results confirm the ability of isoflurane to reduce brain injury caused by focal cerebral ischemia. Fentanyl neither increased nor decreased brain injury compared with the awake unanesthetized state.

Implications: Fentanyl is commonly used in surgical procedures in which there is a substantial risk of focal cerebral ischemia. Fentanyl did not affect cerebral injury produced by focal ischemia in the rat. The data suggest that, in doses that produce respiratory depression and muscle rigidity, fentanyl does not reduce the tolerance of the brain to a focal ischemic insult.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
There is a considerable risk of the occurrence of cerebral ischemia during cardiac and neurological surgery. This has focused interest on the identification of anesthetics that might be able to reduce the vulnerability of the brain to ischemic injury. Most of the investigative efforts to date have been centered on the evaluation of barbiturates and volatile drugs as putative neuroprotective anesthetics. However, synthetic opioids are commonly given to patients undergoing cardiac and neurosurgery, and the effects of these opioids—if any—on ischemic brain injury are not clear. The work of Morimoto et al. (1) indicates that fentanyl, even in doses that produce seizure activity, does not increase postischemic neuronal injury. In that study, the investigators used a model of severe incomplete forebrain ischemia. Most episodes of cerebral ischemia in the operating room setting are focal in nature, and the influence of large-dose opioid administration on the tolerance of the brain to focal cerebral ischemia has not been studied.

Accordingly, we conducted the present study to evaluate the effect of fentanyl administration on outcome after temporary focal cerebral ischemia in rats. The effect of fentanyl was compared with that of isoflurane. Animals that were allowed to awaken during the ischemic interval served as controls.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The study was approved by our institutional animal care and use committee. All experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the guidelines established in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Wistar-Kyoto rats (Simonson Laboratories, San Diego, CA) weighing 275–325 g were fasted overnight. Access to water was provided. The rats were anesthetized with an inspired concentration of 5% isoflurane (Ohmeda, Liberty Corner, NJ). After induction of anesthesia, the animals’ tracheas were intubated, and their lungs were mechanically ventilated with a gas mixture of 30% oxygen/70% nitrogen. The concentration of isoflurane was reduced to 2.5% end-tidal (measured by advancing a 22-gauge needle through the endotracheal tube to the carina). A 5-mm dorsal transverse incision was made 1 cm caudal to the ears. A pericranial temperature probe (Mona-a-Therm; Mallinckrodt, St. Louis, MO) was tunneled via the neck incision, and it was inserted between the left temporalis muscle and the skull. The temperature probe was then sutured in place. Thereafter, pericranial temperature was servocontrolled to 37.0 ± 0.2°C (Model 73A; Yellow Springs Instruments, Yellow Springs, OH) with the combination of a water-heated blanket and an overhead heat lamp. The tail artery was cannulated with PE-50 tubing. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) was monitored continuously. The right external jugular vein was exposed via a midline pretracheal incision and was cannulated with PE-50 tubing. Platinum needle electrodes were inserted in a biparietal configuration, and the electroencephalogram (EEG) (Grass Instruments, Quincy, MA) was monitored continuously.

The animals were prepared surgically for the occlusion of the middle cerebral artery according to the technique of Zea-Longa et al. (2). The right common carotid artery was exposed via a midline pretracheal incision. The vagus and sympathetic nerves were carefully separated from the artery. The external carotid artery was ligated 2 mm distal to the bifurcation of the common carotid artery. The pterygopalatine artery was then ligated approximately 1 mm distal to its takeoff. The common carotid artery was then permanently ligated. Via a small arteriotomy, a 0.25-mm diameter nylon monofilament previously coated with silicone was inserted into the proximal common carotid artery.

The animals were then allocated randomly to one of three experimental groups. In the fentanyl group, 50 µg/kg undiluted fentanyl (Elkins-Sinn Incorporated, Cherry Hill, NJ) was administered IV over a period of 10 min. Thereafter, a continuous infusion of fentanyl was initiated at a rate of 50 µg · kg–1 · h–1. Simultaneously, the concentration of isoflurane was reduced to 1.1% end-tidal. In the awake and isoflurane groups, the concentration of isoflurane was reduced to 1.1% end-tidal (approximately 1 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration [MAC]) (3). These animals received an IV infusion of isotonic sodium chloride solution at a rate of 4 mL · kg–1 · h–1. The animals were left undisturbed for 30 min. During this time, arterial blood gas tensions were measured. Ventilation variables were adjusted to maintain PaCO2 in the range of 35–40 mm Hg. Serum glucose and hematocrit were measured and recorded.

After the 30-min equilibration period, focal cerebral ischemia for 90 min was induced by advancing the monofilament into the anterior cerebral artery via the common carotid artery to a distance of 18–20 mm from the bifurcation of the common carotid artery. Advancement of the filament was halted when mild resistance was encountered. The monofilament was then secured. The pretracheal wound was closed with a suture. All wounds were subsequently infiltrated with 0.25% bupivacaine (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL; total dose 0.5 mg).

In the awake group, isoflurane administration was discontinued. On resumption of spontaneous ventilation, mechanical ventilation was discontinued, and the endotracheal tube was removed. The EEG electrodes were also removed. Thereafter, the animals were transferred to a heated and humidified incubator through which oxygen was continuously flushed. The animals were anesthetized briefly with isoflurane at the end of the ischemic period. The pretracheal incision was reopened, and the monofilament was removed from the common carotid artery. The wound was resutured and the animals were allowed to awaken.

In the isoflurane group, the concentration of isoflurane was maintained at 1.1% end-tidal throughout the ischemic interval. The EEG was monitored continuously. The monofilament was removed from the common carotid artery at the end of the 90-min ischemic interval. The animals were then allowed to awaken.

In the fentanyl group, isoflurane administration was discontinued after the initial suture closure of the pretracheal incision. The lungs were mechanically ventilated with a gas mixture of 30% oxygen/70% nitrogen. In 15 animals, spontaneous ventilation resumed. In these animals, mechanical lung ventilation was temporarily stopped. After 5 min, arterial blood gas tensions were measured. All animals had a PaCO2 within a range of 38–45 mm Hg. The tracheas of these animals were then extubated, and the EEG electrodes were removed. Arterial gas tensions were measured again approximately 30 min later to determine whether the animals’ ability to breathe was adequate. In the remaining 11 animals, spontaneous respiratory efforts were not observed. In these animals, mechanical ventilation of the lungs was maintained, and the EEG was monitored continuously throughout the ischemic interval. At the end of the ischemic period, the infusion of fentanyl was discontinued. The animals were reanesthetized briefly with isoflurane. The monofilament was removed from the common carotid artery. The pretracheal wound was closed with suture. The EEG electrodes were removed, and the animals were then allowed to awaken. In the animals that required mechanical ventilation of the lungs, the endotracheal tubes were removed within 45 min after the onset of reperfusion.

Pericranial temperature was servocontrolled at 37.0 ± 0.2°C throughout the ischemic interval. During the recovery period, the pericranial temperature was recorded at 1-h intervals for 4 h. Thereafter, the temperature probe was removed. In addition, the morning rectal temperature was measured daily for 4 days after ischemia.

The animals were killed 7 days after ischemia. The rats were anesthetized with isoflurane for transcardiac perfusion with 200 mL of heparinized saline, followed by 200 mL of buffered 4% paraformaldehyde. The animals were decapitated, and the brains were left in situ at a temperature of approximately 4°C for 24 h. Thereafter, the brains were carefully removed, immersed in fixative, and refrigerated at a temperature of approximately 4°C for another 24 h. The brains were then prepared for histologic analysis. After dehydration in graded concentrations of ethanol and butanol, the brains were embedded in paraffin. Coronal sections (8 µ) at intervals of 0.75 mm were prepared and stained with hematoxylin and eosin.

Injury to the brain was evaluated by image analysis using National Institutes of Health Image 1.60 software and a computer. The analysis was performed by two observers who had no prior knowledge of the experimental groups. The area of injury to the subcortex and to the cortex was determined. The total volume of injury was determined by integration of the area of injury in each section according to the technique of Swanson et al. (3).

The physiologic values were evaluated by using a repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) (Statview 4.0; Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA). The volume of tissue injury was analyzed by using a single-factor ANOVA. When the ANOVA identified significant differences, post hoc Scheffé’s tests were used for intergroup comparisons. A P value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All data are presented as mean ± SD.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
A total of 73 animals were studied. Of these, 13 animals died before the 7-day recovery period. Subarachnoid hemorrhage was documented in one, two, and four animals in the isoflurane, fentanyl, and awake groups, respectively. Six animals died during the recovery period: four in the fentanyl group and two in the awake group. These animals were excluded from the analysis because histologic analysis of brain injury could not be performed. Sixty animals (n = 20 per group) were included in the final data analysis.

The physiologic variables are presented in Table 1. Baseline MAP and heart rate (HR) were similar in the three groups. During ischemia, the MAP and HR were significantly greater in the awake and fentanyl groups than in the isoflurane group. At the end of the 90-min ischemic period, there were no differences in MAP and HR among the groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Physiologic Variables in the Three Experimental Groups
 
Baseline PaCO2 and pH were similar in the three groups. During ischemia, PaCO2 was less in the awake group than in the isoflurane and fentanyl groups. Although the PaCO2 was greater in the fentanyl group than the isoflurane group, a statistical difference was not attained. After ischemia, the PaCO2 in the awake group was less than that in the other two groups. The arterial pH in the fentanyl group was lower than that in the isoflurane and awake groups during ischemia. In addition, the arterial pH in the awake group was greater than that in the isoflurane group. There were no differences in serum glucose and hematocrit among the groups.

The temperatures (pericranial temperature before and during ischemia and for 4 h after ischemia and rectal temperature 1, 2, 3, and 4 days after ischemia) of the animals in the groups are presented in Figure 1. Temperature differences among the groups were not observed at any time. Hyperthermia after ischemia was not evident in any group.


Figure 1
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Temperature values for animals in the three experimental groups. During the period of ischemia, pericranial temperature was servocontrolled to a target value of 37.0 ± 0.2°C. In the first 4 h after ischemia (reperfusion), pericranial temperature was measured but was not controlled. There were no statistically significant differences among the groups. In the recovery period, morning rectal temperature was measured daily for 4 days. There were no differences in temperature among the groups during this time. The data are presented as mean ± SD.

 
In the fentanyl group, truncal, tail, and limb rigidity was evident in all the animals during the ischemic interval. There was no evidence of seizure activity (gross seizures or ictal activity on the EEG) in this group. Rigidity and seizure activity were not observed in the isoflurane and awake groups.

The total infarct volumes in the three groups are presented in Figure 2. In the subcortex, the infarct volumes were similar among groups (P = 0.25). The cortical infarct volume in the isoflurane group was less than that in the fentanyl and awake groups (P = 0.01). There was no difference in infarct volume between the awake and fentanyl groups (P = 0.91).


Figure 2
View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Subcortex and cortex infarct volumes in the three groups. The mean infarct volume is presented above each vertical bar. Within the subcortex, the infarct volumes were similar among the groups. The cortex infarct volume was significantly less in the isoflurane group than in either the awake or fentanyl groups. Data are presented as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 for isoflurane versus the awake and fentanyl groups.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The results of the present study show that the extent of brain injury after temporary focal cerebral ischemia in animals in the awake and fentanyl groups was similar. By contrast, brain infarct volumes in the isoflurane-anesthetized animals were significantly less than those in either the awake or fentanyl-sedated animals. These data indicate that, when given in doses that produce sedation, muscle rigidity, and hypoventilation, fentanyl neither increases nor decreases brain injury after temporary focal cerebral ischemia in rats.

The observation that fentanyl did not increase brain injury after cerebral ischemia seems to be inconsistent with the results reported by Kofke et al. (4). These investigators reported that fentanyl substantially increased neuronal injury (compared with a control state in which fentanyl had not been given) in animals subjected to severe forebrain ischemia. This was attributed in part to the increased brain metabolic rate produced by opioid-induced seizure activity.1Differences in the experimental approach and the model used can probably explain these conflicting results. In the study of Kofke et al., histologic injury was evaluated 18 h after ischemia. In the forebrain ischemia model, delayed neuronal death can occur for several days after ischemia (6). Therefore, the difference in injury between the fentanyl group and the control group may not have been apparent had the recovery period been extended from 4 to 7 days. In support of this argument, Morimoto et al. (1) have shown that, in a dose of 400 µg/kg (sufficient to cause seizure activity), fentanyl did not increase neuronal injury after forebrain ischemia. In that study, injury was evaluated 4 days after ischemia. The authors conclude that fentanyl did not produce any worsening of brain injury in the setting of global ischemia. In vitro data also indicate that fentanyl does not enhance ischemic neuronal injury. In hippocampal slices, fentanyl did not affect electrophysiologic recovery after anoxic injury, i.e., fentanyl was neither neurotoxic nor neuroprotective (7). The results of the present study are consistent with the findings of Morimoto et al. (1) and Charchaflieh et al. (7) in that they demonstrate an absence of a deleterious effect of fentanyl during focal ischemia.

The results of the present study must also be reconciled with the previous demonstrations of the beneficial effect of naloxone, a µ-receptor antagonist, in models of cerebral ischemia and injury. For example, naloxone improved neurologic recovery in a model of traumatic cervical (8,9) and thoracic spinal cord injury (10) and in a model of spinal cord ischemia (11). In addition, naloxone has also been shown to improve outcome in gerbil (12), dog (13), and cat (14) models of cerebral ischemia. Collectively, these studies suggest an important role for opiate receptors in the pathophysiology of ischemia. However, they do not conclusively prove the involvement of µ-receptors for two reasons. First, not all studies have demonstrated an improvement in neurologic outcome with naloxone administration. Naloxone has also failed to reduce ischemic neuronal injury in gerbils subjected to forebrain ischemia (15). Previous work from our group has also demonstrated that naloxone does not improve outcome in a rabbit spinal cord ischemia model (16). Second, the dose of naloxone required to produce a beneficial effect (>2 mg/kg) is far in excess of that required to antagonize µ-receptors (17). As a result, it has been suggested that the beneficial actions of naloxone are the result of its activity at opiate receptors other than µ-receptors.

Isoflurane anesthesia substantially reduced postischemic cerebral injury. The precise mechanism by which this reduction in injury was achieved is not clear. Uncontrolled release of glutamate during ischemia and the consequent excessive stimulation of postsynaptic glutamate receptors (excitotoxicity) plays a major role in the initiation of neuronal injury (18). Previous investigations have shown that isoflurane can inhibit the release of glutamate from anoxic brain slices (19) and from the cortex of rats subjected to incomplete forebrain ischemia (20). In addition, inhibition of postsynaptic glutamate receptors by isoflurane has also been demonstrated. In neocortical slices, isoflurane reduced neuronal depolarizing responses evoked by the application of glutamate and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) on dendrites (21). Isoflurane also reduced the frequency of NMDA receptor channel opening and the mean open time of the channel in response to stimulation by NMDA (22). The expected increase in intracellular calcium concentration in response to application of NMDA was reduced by isoflurane in cultured hippocampal cells (23) and in neocortical brain slices (19). Collectively, these data indicate that attenuation of excitotoxicity by isoflurane anesthesia may have contributed to the observed reduction in ischemic injury in the isoflurane group.

Another potential mechanism by which isoflurane may have reduced cerebral injury is by the reduction of the stress response during ischemia. There is a significant increase in the levels of circulating catecholamines (a marker of the stress response) during ischemia. Werner et al. (24) have demonstrated that suppression of ischemia-induced catecholamine release substantially reduces neuronal injury. Administration of exogenous catecholamines can, however, augment injury (24). It is probable that the stress response in the awake and fentanyl-sedated animals was greater than that in the isoflurane group. This may also have contributed to the smaller infarct volumes in the isoflurane group.

The observation that isoflurane reduced infarct volume after focal ischemia is at a variance with the results reported by Sarraf-Yazdi et al. (25). In a model of focal ischemia in the rat similar to that used in the present study, these investigators did not observe a statistically significant reduction in infarct volumes in animals anesthetized with 0.7% isoflurane compared with animals kept awake during ischemia. A trend toward smaller infarct volumes in the isoflurane-anesthetized animals, however, was apparent. A significant methodologic difference between the study of Sarraf-Yazdi et al. (25) and the present study is the dose of isoflurane that was administered to the animals during ischemia. In the former, a smaller dose of isoflurane (0.7%) was used than in the present study (1.1%, MAC). In doses of 1 MAC, isoflurane has been shown to result in NMDA receptor antagonism in vitro (see above). If NMDA antagonism is one of major mechanisms by which isoflurane reduces ischemic injury, the degree of NMDA receptor antagonism and, therefore, the degree of neuroprotection, would be expected to be greater in the present study. Our results are consistent with this argument. This argument also suggests that the ability of isoflurane to reduce focal cerebral injury may well be dose-related. This premise is worthy of further investigation.

The rationale for the amount of fentanyl given to the rats in this study needs clarification. In the study of Kofke et al. (26), fentanyl was found to produce neuronal injury (nonischemic brain) when given in doses >400 µg/kg. Based on these data, a dose of 400 µg/kg was chosen. However, pilot experiments revealed that, in a significant number of animals, muscular rigidity and seizure activity during ischemia resulted in acidemia (blood pH <7.30). The acidemia could have been reduced by the administration of muscle relaxants. However, in our opinion, this could be justified only if nitrous oxide had been administered in addition to the fentanyl. Because it was our intention to specifically evaluate the effect of fentanyl on postischemic neuronal outcome, we chose not to give nitrous oxide. As a pragmatic compromise, we reduced the total dose of fentanyl to 150 µg/kg. This dose produced clinical evidence of significant µ-receptor agonism (mild to moderate muscle rigidity, sedation, and hypoventilation) without evidence of seizure activity. Although mild acidemia did develop in the fentanyl group, the reduction in pH was relatively minor.

The results of this study are also of relevance to investigations of the pathophysiology of cerebral ischemia in general. Many investigative approaches require a control group that is anesthetized. Anesthetics that are most commonly used to anesthetize the "control" group are the volatile anesthetics (halothane in particular). There is a large body of evidence that indicates that volatile anesthetics reduce ischemic brain injury substantially (2729). This makes the comparison of the effect of novel pharmacologic drugs on outcome after cerebral ischemia with an anesthetized control state difficult. A potential solution is the use of synthetic opioids such as fentanyl. Our results show that, in the dose administered in this study, fentanyl does not affect outcome after focal ischemia. Warner et al. (30) have also shown that nitrous oxide does not influence total infarct volume after focal ischemia. Therefore, a combination of fentanyl and nitrous oxide may provide an alternative anesthetic technique for studies in which an anesthetized control state is required.

In summary, isoflurane reduced ischemic brain injury after 90 min of temporary focal ischemia. This is consistent with previous reports in which the ability of volatile anesthetics to reduce ischemic brain injury was demonstrated. The infarct volume in the fentanyl-sedated animals was similar to that in the nonanesthetized awake group. These data indicate that, in a dose of 150 µg/kg, fentanyl does not materially affect brain injury after focal cerebral ischemia.


    Acknowledgments
 
Supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GMS 52098 to PMP.


    Footnotes
 
1 Kofke WA, Garman RH, Garman R, et al. Opioid neurotoxicity: fentanyl-induced exacerbation of forebrain ischemia in rats [abstract]. Anesthesiology 1994;81:A820. Back


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Morimoto Y, Morimoto Y, Bart RD, et al. High-dose fentanyl does not adversely affect outcome from forebrain ischemia in the rat. J Neurosurg Anesth 1997;9:316–23.[Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Zea-Longa E, Weinstein PR, Carlson S, et al. Reversible middle cerebral artery occlusion without craniectomy in rats. Stroke 1989;20:84–91.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Cole DJ, Marcantonio S, Drummond JC. Anesthetic requirement of isoflurane is reduced in spontaneously hypertensive and Wistar-Kyoto rats. Lab Anim Sci 1990;40:506–9.[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Swanson RA, Morton MT, Wu GT, et al. A semiautomated method for measuring brain infarct volume. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1990;10:290–3.[Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Deleted in proof.
  6. Kofke WA, Garman RH, Tom WC, et al. Alfentanil-induced hypermetabolism, seizure, and histopathology in rat brain. Anesth Analg 1992;75:953–64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Kirino T. Delayed neuronal death in the gerbil hippocampus following ischemia. Brain Res 1982;239:257–69.
  8. Charchaflieh J, Cottrell JE, Kass IS. The effect of fentanyl on electrophysiologic recovery of CA1 pyramidal cells from anoxia in the rat hippocampal slice. Anesth Analg 1998;87:68–71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Faden AI, Jacobs TP, Mougey E, et al. Endorphins in experimental spinal injury therapeutic effect of naloxone. Ann Neurol 1981;10:326–32.[Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Faden AI, Jacobs TP, Holaday JW. Opiate antagonist improves neurologic recovery after spinal injury. Science 1981;211:493–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Flamm ES, Young W, Demopoulos HB, et al. Experimental spinal cord injury treatment with naloxone. Neurosurgery 1982;10:227–31.[Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Zivin JA, DeGirolami U, Hurwitz EL. Spectrum of neurological deficits in experimental CNS ischemia a quantitative study. Arch Neurol 1982;39:408–12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Hosobuchi Y, Baskin DS, Woo SK. Reversal of neurological deficits by opiate antagonist naloxone after cerebral ischemia in animals and humans. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1982;2 (Suppl 1):S98–100.[Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Faden AI, Hallenbeck JM, Brown CQ. Treatment of experimental stroke comparison of naloxone and thyrotropin releasing hormone. Neurology 1982;32:1083–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Levy R, Feustel P, Severinghaus J, et al. Effect of naloxone on neurologic deficit and cortical blood flow during focal cerebral ischemia in cats. Life Sci 1982;31:2205–8.[Web of Science][Medline]
  16. Kastin AJ, Nissen C, Olson RD. Failure of MIF-1 or naloxone to reverse ischemic-induced neurologic deficits in gerbils. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1982;17:1083–5.[Web of Science][Medline]
  17. Cole DJ, Drummond JC, Shapiro HM, et al. The effect of fentanyl anesthesia and intrathecal naloxone on neurologic outcome following spinal cord injury in the rat. Anesthesiology 1989;71:426–30.[Web of Science][Medline]
  18. Faden AI. Neuropeptides and central nervous system injury clinical implications. Arch Neurol 1986;43:501–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Siesjö BK, Zhao Q, Pahlmark K, et al. Glutamate, calcium, and free radicals as mediators of ischemic brain damage. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59:1316–20.
  20. Bickler PE, Buck LT, Hansen BM. Effects of isoflurane and hypothermia on glutamate receptor-mediated calcium influx in brain slices. Anesthesiology 1994;81:1461–9.[Web of Science][Medline]
  21. Patel PM, Drummond JC, Cole DJ, et al. Isoflurane reduces ischemia-induced glutamate release in rats subjected to forebrain ischemia. Anesthesiology 1995;82:996–1003.[Web of Science][Medline]
  22. Puil E, El-Beheiry H. Anaesthetic suppression of transmitter actions in neocortex. Br J Pharmacol 1990;101:61–6.
  23. Yang J, Zorumski CF. Effects of isoflurane on N-methyl-D-aspartate gated ion channels in cultured rat hippocampal neurons. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1991;625:287–9.[Web of Science][Medline]
  24. Puil E, El-Beheiry H, Baimbridge KG. Anesthetic effects on glutamate-stimulated increase in intraneuronal calcium. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1990;255:955–61.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Werner C, Hoffman W, Thomas C, et al. Ganglionic blockade improves neurologic outcome from incomplete ischemia in rats partial reversal by exogenous catecholamines. Anesthesiology 1990;73:923–9.[Web of Science][Medline]
  26. Sarraf-Yazdi S, Sheng H, Muira Y, et al. Relative neuroprotective effects of dizocilpine and isoflurane during focal cerebral ischemia in the rat. Anesth Analg 1998;87:72–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Kofke WA, Garman RH, Stiller RL, et al. Opioid neurotoxicity fentanyl dose-response effects in rats. Anesth Analg 1996;83:1298–306.[Abstract]
  28. Baughman VL, Hoffman WE, Miletich DJ, et al. Neurologic outcome in rats following incomplete cerebral ischemia during halothane, isoflurane or N2O. Anesthesiology 1988;69:192–8.[Web of Science][Medline]
  29. Warner DS, McFarlane C, Todd MM, et al. Sevoflurane and halothane reduce focal ischemic brain damage in the rat. Anesthesiology 1993;79:985–92.[Web of Science][Medline]
  30. Warner DS, Ludwig PS, Pearlstein R, et al. Halothane reduces focal ischemic injury in the rat when brain temperature is controlled. Anesthesiology 1995;82:1237–45.[Web of Science][Medline]
  31. Warner DS, Zhou JG, Ramani R, et al. Nitrous oxide does not alter infarct volume in rats undergoing reversible middle cerebral artery occlusion. Anesthesiology 1990;73:686–93.[Web of Science][Medline]
Accepted for publication October 2, 1998.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
I. Nasu, N. Yokoo, S. Takaoka, K. Takata, T. Hoshikawa, M. Okada, and Y. Miura
The dose-dependent effects of isoflurane on outcome from severe forebrain ischemia in the rat.
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2006; 103(2): 413 - 8, table of contents.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. Inoue, D. P. Davis, J. C. Drummond, D. J. Cole, and P. M. Patel
The combination of isoflurane and caspase 8 inhibition results in sustained neuroprotection in rats subject to focal cerebral ischemia.
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2006; 102(5): 1548 - 1555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
G. Djaiani, L. Fedorko, and W. S. Beattie
Regional Anesthesia in Cardiac Surgery: A Friend or A Foe?
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2005; 9(1): 87 - 104.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
L. Wise-Faberowski, M. Aono, R. D. Pearlstein, and D. S. Warner
Apoptosis Is Not Enhanced in Primary Mixed Neuronal/Glial Cultures Protected by Isoflurane AgainstN-Methyl-D-Aspartate Excitotoxicity
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2004; 99(6): 1708 - 1714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Kawaguchi, J. C. Drummond, D. J. Cole, P. J. Kelly, M. P. Spurlock, and P. M. Patel
Effect of Isoflurane on Neuronal Apoptosis in Rats Subjected to Focal Cerebral Ischemia
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2004; 98(3): 798 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. E. Bickler, D. S. Warner, G. Stratmann, and J. A. Schuyler
{gamma}-Aminobutyric Acid-A Receptors Contribute to Isoflurane Neuroprotection in Organotypic Hippocampal Cultures
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2003; 97(2): 564 - 571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. S. Wainwright, H. Sheng, Y. Sato, G. Burkhard Mackensen, R. P. Steffen, R. D. Pearlstein, and D. S. Warner
Pharmacological correction of hypothermic P50 shift does not alter outcome from focal cerebral ischemia in rats
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2002; 282(5): H1863 - H1870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. Nellgard, G. B. Mackensen, G. Massey, R. D. Pearlstein, and D. S. Warner
The Effects of Anesthetics on Stress Responses to Forebrain Ischemia and Reperfusion in the Rat
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2000; 91(1): 145 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
H. Harada, P. J. Kelly, D. J. Cole, J. C. Drummond, and P. M. Patel
Isoflurane Reduces N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Toxicity In Vivo in the Rat Cerebral Cortex
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 1999; 89(6): 1442 - 1442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (41)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soonthon-Brant, V.
Right arrow Articles by Watson, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soonthon-Brant, V.
Right arrow Articles by Watson, M.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 1999 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press