| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||

,
Departments of
*Anesthesiology,
Pediatrics, and
Child Study Center and The Children's Clinical Research Center, Yale School of Medicine, Connecticut
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Zeev N. Kain, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St., New Haven, CT 06510. Address e-mail to kain{at}biomed.med.yale.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Implications: Anesthesiologists who care for children who are anxious during the induction of anesthesia should inform parents that these children have an increased likelihood of developing postoperative negative behavioral changes.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Postoperative negative behavioral changes, such as nightmares and separation anxiety, may occur in up to 60% of all children undergoing general anesthesia and surgery (2,10). These behavioral changes are likely the result of an interaction between the distress the child experiences during the perioperative period and the individual personality characteristics of the child. Variables such as the age and temperament of the child and the state and trait anxiety of the parent have been identified as predictors for the occurrence of negative postoperative behavioral changes (2). There is a paucity of data, however, regarding a possible association between the distress the child experiences during the induction of anesthesia and the occurrence of negative postoperative behavioral changes.
The purpose of this investigation, therefore, was to examine whether children who are notably distressed during the induction of anesthesia are more at risk of developing postoperative negative behavioral changes compared with children who appear calm during the anesthetic induction process.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Detailed reliability and validity data regarding the following behavioral assessment tools were reported previously by our study group (6,11). These behavioral measures were applied to the patient population to either assess baseline characteristics or the outcomes or to serve as covariates in the analysis process.
Temperament, Anxiety, and Compliance
The EASI Instrument of child temperament (EASI) (12) is a parental report instrument that assesses four temperament categories (Emotionality, Activity, Sociability, and Impulsivity) in children and is widely used in the literature.
The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (13) is a self-report anxiety instrument that contains two separate 20-item subscales that measure trait (baseline) and state (situational) anxiety.
The Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (mYPAS) (14,15) is an observational instrument of anxiety that contains 27 items in five categories (Activity, Emotional Expressivity, State of Arousal, Vocalization, and Use of Parents) that indicate anxiety in children in the surgical setting.
Primary Behavioral Outcome
The Post-Hospitalization Behavior Questionnaire (PHBQ) (16,17) is a self-report questionnaire for parents that is widely used in the literature and is designed to evaluate maladaptive behavioral responses and "developmental regression" in children after surgery.
Developmental regression refers to loss of previously gained developmental milestones (e.g., loss of bladder control, loss of language abilitiestalks "baby talk"). The PHBQ consists of 27 items often cited in the literature as common behavioral responses of children after surgery or hospitalization. Six categories of anxiety are incorporated in this instrument, including General Anxiety, Separation Anxiety, Sleep Anxiety, Eating Disturbances, Aggression Against Authority, and Apathy/Withdrawal. For each item, parents rate the extent to which each behavior changed in frequency compared with before surgery. Response options for each of the 27 behaviors were much less than before surgery (-2), less than before surgery (-1), not changed (0), more than before surgery (+1), or much more than before surgery (+2). This instrument shows good agreement with psychiatric interviews with parents of preschool children (r = 0.47) and has been used in several investigations to document behavioral changes as a function of preoperative interventions (18).
One to ten days before surgery, all potential patients were screened for recent stressful life events by using Sandler and Block's modified version of Coddington's Life Event Scale for Children (19). Parents were asked to indicate whether their child had experienced any stressful life events in the month before surgery (e.g., divorce, family moved to new house, parent lost job, started new school). Children who presented with a recent stressful life event were not eligible to participate in the study. After recruitment, demographic data, temperament of the child (EASI), and trait anxiety of the parent (STAI) were obtained. Parents also completed a baseline PHBQ. Approximately half of the children (47%) underwent a behavioral preoperative preparation program that consists of providing information to the child and parent, an orientation tour of the operating room (OR) and recovery room, and modeling/medical play using dolls with child-life specialists.
Using observational (mYPAS) and self-report (STAI) validated anxiety measures, children and parents were evaluated in the holding area and on separation to the OR. If a child exhibited extreme anxiety on separation (as determined solely by the anesthesiologist managing the case), rescue therapy in the form of parental presence during induction was offered to the parents.
All patients were brought into the OR and placed on the OR table. Next, an SpO2 probe was placed on the child's hand, and a scented anesthesia mask was presented to the child. O2/N2O was introduced in a ratio of 3:7 L flow, and halothane was started in a concentration of 0.2%, then increased every three breaths to a maximum of 2.5%. If a child became noncompliant during induction, the mask induction was continued as planned with the child restrained. Once anesthesia was induced, an IV cannula was inserted, and 0.1 mg/kg IV vecuronium was administrated to facilitate intubation. Anesthesia was maintained with O2/N2O and isoflurane; IV fentanyl (24 µg/kg) was administered. At the conclusion of all herniorrhaphies, the surgeons locally infiltrated the wound with 23 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. Regional anesthesia was not performed on any of the patients in the study, and drugs such as ketamine, atropine, or droperidol were not used. The behavior of the child during induction was evaluated by an independent observer using the mYPAS at two time points: on entering the OR and on introduction of the anesthesia mask to the child.
Immediately on entering the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), the level of each child's "postoperative excitement" was graded according to a 3-point excitement scale (20,20a). This score ranges from 0 (child is lying quietly, with no crying) to 3 (thrashing and/or needs restraint and/or constant crying). The incidence of adverse effects in the PACU was also recorded. Additional pain medication (either 1015 mg/kg oral acetaminophen or 12 µg/kg IV fentanyl) was administered at the discretion of the anesthesiologist. All parents were present in the PACU during their child's recovery period. On Postoperative Days 1, 2, 3, 7, and 14, parents were contacted over the telephone by a research nurse who was blinded to the child's behavior during induction. Parents were asked about behavioral changes in their child (PHBQ) and about their child's pain (visual analog scale). The nurse was able to contact 87% of patients on Day 1, 81% on Day 2, 86% on Day 3, 86% on Day 7, and 71% on Day 14.
The primary association examined in this study was the anxiety of the child during the induction of anesthesia versus the postoperative behavior of the child. Given a null correlation hypothesis of rxy = 0, a two-sided
level of 0.05, and a power of 0.80, at least 88 patients were needed to complete this study (21). Descriptive statistics provide an overview of the relationships between the child-parent variables and the anxiety level in the child. Normally distributed data are presented as mean ± SD; skewed data are presented as median (25%75%). The primary outcome was analyzed using a multivariate logistic regression model in which the dependent variable was the presence or absence of postoperative negative behavioral changes and the independent variables included variables such as anxiety of the child during induction, the follow-up time point after surgery, the type of surgical procedure, surgical history, age of the child, and the presence or absence of a preoperative preparation program. Results are reported as odds ratio (95% confidence intervals). To demonstrate the direction of the association between anxiety during induction and postoperative negative behavior changes over time, the entire cohort was divided into three subgroups: a calm group that included children who scored <25th percentile of the mYPAS on introduction of the anesthesia mask; an intermediate group that included children between the 25th and 75th percentiles of the mYPAS score; and an anxious group that included children who scored >75th percentile of the mYPAS. Statistical significance was assumed for P
0.05. Data were analyzed by using SPSS version 6.1.1 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although many studies have assessed children's reactions to medical procedures and subsequent behavior (17,22), few have evaluated the relationship between children's reactions to specific hospital stressors and the later development of problems. This is hardly surprising considering that a child undergoing anesthesia, surgery, and possibly admission is exposed to multiple stressors, which makes it very difficult to identify the isolated effect of each stressor. Two recent investigations, however, have suggested that a significant predictor for negative postoperative behavioral changes is the behavior of the child in the preoperative holding area (2,23).
A number of previous investigations provide data regarding the effects of the induction of anesthesia on postoperative behavior. In 1958, Eckenhoff (24) reported that "unsatisfactory" inductions are associated with significantly more negative postoperative personality changes compared with "smooth inductions" (57% vs 13%). Eckenhoff, however, did not control for confounding variables such as sedative premedication, anesthetic techniques, and the use of inpatients as subjects. The use of inpatients is particularly problematic because it is difficult to establish whether the personality changes observed were related to the induction of anesthesia or some other perioperative events. Furthermore, the behavioral instruments that were used to assess both the predictor variable (i.e., anxiety of the child during induction) and the primary end point (i.e., personality changes) were not validated, and no reliability data are provided about the instruments used.
Some 20 yr later, Meyers and Muravchick (25) compared postoperative behavioral responses in a group of children who underwent a "steal induction" versus a group of children who underwent an "awake" induction. One month after the children's discharge from the hospital, the investigators reported that the rate of behavioral changes was 88% in the awake group and 58% in the steal group. The steal group, however, was premedicated with atropine and droperidol, whereas the awake group was not premedicated. All subjects were asleep upon arrival in the OR. As with the earlier investigation, all children were also hospitalized, the primary end point of the study was not clear, and the behavioral instruments used were not validated.
In contrast to previous studies, the present investigation tried to avoid potential confounding variables, such as recent stressful life events, sedative premedication, parental presence during induction, and anesthetic drugs associated with behavioral sequelae. Moreover, only validated behavioral tools were used to assess both anxiety during the induction of anesthesia and the behavioral outcomes after surgery. This is the first study to document specific behaviors that may occur in children who are very anxious during the induction of anesthesia, the results of which are of particular importance because parents can be advised which behaviors may be expected.
Several methodological issues related to this study should be clarified. First, although we found that children who are markedly anxious during induction of anesthesia are significantly more likely to develop postoperative negative behavioral changes, it is important to emphasize that we have demonstrated not a cause-effect relationship, but rather an association between two phenomena. It is plausible that anxious children would have developed postoperative negative behavioral changes regardless of their anxiety during the induction of anesthesia. One method to directly answer this question is to conduct a randomized, controlled trial that includes matched pairs identical in all aspects except in their anxiety level during the induction of anesthesia. Such an experiment is clearly impossible to perform.
Second, our lack of control over the participation in the preoperative preparation program may represent a methodological design flaw. The standard of care in our institution is to offer participation in this voluntary preparation program to all patients who can be contacted before surgery. Our usual participation rate in the preoperative preparation program ranges from 40% to 60%. All patients participating in this study were offered participation in the preparation programparticipation was voluntary. Although it is important that our study group has demonstrated in two separate trials that preoperative preparation programs are not effective in reducing the incidence of postoperative negative behavioral changes (7,26), this issue should have been controlled for in this investigation. To overcome this limitation, we included this variable in multivariate analysis. All analyses performed revealed that participation in the preparation program did not affect the outcome assessed.
In conclusion, we demonstrated that children who are anxious during the induction of anesthesia are also likely to develop postoperative negative behavioral changes. We do not suggest a cause-effect relationship, but rather an association. Anesthesiologists should make parents aware of the possibility that their child may develop negative behaviors in the 2 wk after surgery if their child was very anxious during the induction of anesthesia.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The authors thank Paul G. Barash, MD, for his critical review of this manuscript.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.-H. Park, R. Foster, and Sufen Cheng Language Used by Korean and Korean American Children to Describe Emotional Reactions to Illness and Hospitalization J Transcult Nurs, April 1, 2009; 20(2): 176 - 186. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Varughese, T. G. Nick, J. Gunter, Y. Wang, and C. D. Kurth Factors Predictive of Poor Behavioral Compliance During Inhaled Induction in Children Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2008; 107(2): 413 - 421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. W. Loepke and S. G. Soriano An Assessment of the Effects of General Anesthetics on Developing Brain Structure and Neurocognitive Function Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2008; 106(6): 1681 - 1707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. MacLaren and Z. N. Kain Prevalence and Predictors of Significant Sleep Disturbances in Children Undergoing Ambulatory Tonsillectomy and Adenoidectomy J. Pediatr. Psychol., April 1, 2008; 33(3): 248 - 257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. MacLaren and Z. N. Kain A Comparison of Preoperative Anxiety in Female Patients with Mothers of Children Undergoing Surgery Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2008; 106(3): 810 - 813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Klosky, V. L. Tyc, X. Tong, D. K. Srivastava, M. Kronenberg, A. J. de Armendi, and T. E. Merchant Predicting Pediatric Distress During Radiation Therapy Procedures: The Role of Medical, Psychosocial, and Demographic Factors Pediatrics, May 1, 2007; 119(5): e1159 - e1166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Steinmetz, R. Holm-Knudsen, K. Eriksen, D. Marxen, and L. S. Rasmussen Quality Differences in Postoperative Sleep Between Propofol-Remifentanil and Sevoflurane Anesthesia in Infants Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2007; 104(4): 779 - 783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D. Wright, S. H. Stewart, G. A. Finley, and S. E. Buffett-Jerrott Prevention and Intervention Strategies to Alleviate Preoperative Anxiety in Children: A Critical Review Behav Modif, January 1, 2007; 31(1): 52 - 79. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. S. Shawky A New Friendly Approach to Pediatric Inhaled Induction Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2005; 100(3): 901 - 902. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. N. Kain, A. A. Caldwell-Andrews, I. Maranets, B. McClain, D. Gaal, L. C. Mayes, R. Feng, and H. Zhang Preoperative Anxiety and Emergence Delirium and Postoperative Maladaptive Behaviors Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2004; 99(6): 1648 - 1654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Stein, P. Rothstein, and J. H. Kennell Preparing a 3-Year-Old and His Parents for an Elective Surgery Pediatrics, November 1, 2004; 114(5/S2): 1414 - 1418. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. N. Kain, A. A. Caldwell-Andrews, D. M. Krivutza, M. E. Weinberg, S.-M. Wang, and D. Gaal Trends in the Practice of Parental Presence During Induction of Anesthesia and the Use of Preoperative Sedative Premedication in the United States, 1995-2002: Results of a Follow-Up National Survey Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2004; 98(5): 1252 - 1259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. P. O'Sullivan, L. Finger, and R. G. Zwerdling Use of Nasopharyngoscopy in the Evaluation of Children With Noisy Breathing Chest, April 1, 2004; 125(4): 1265 - 1269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. C. Weldon, M. Bell, and T. Craddock The Effect of Caudal Analgesia on Emergence Agitation in Children After Sevoflurane Versus Halothane Anesthesia Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2004; 98(2): 321 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. N. Kain, A. A. Caldwell-Andrews, S.-M. Wang, D. M. Krivutza, M. E. Weinberg, and L. C. Mayes Parental Intervention Choices for Children Undergoing Repeated Surgeries Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2003; 96(4): 970 - 975. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Tuomilehto, H. Kokki, R. Ahonen, and J. Nuutinen Postoperative Behavioral Changes in Children After Adenoidectomy Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, October 1, 2002; 128(10): 1159 - 1164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. McCann and Z. N. Kain The Management of Preoperative Anxiety in Children: An Update Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2001; 93(1): 98 - 105. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Fazi, E. C. Jantzen, J. B. Rose, C. D. Kurth, and M. F. Watcha A Comparison of Oral Clonidine and Oral Midazolam as Preanesthetic Medications in the Pediatric Tonsillectomy Patient Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2001; 92(1): 56 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|