JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vollmar, B.
Right arrow Articles by Menger, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vollmar, B.
Right arrow Articles by Menger, M. D.
Anesth Analg 1999;88:1244
© 1999 International Anesthesia Research Society


CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIA

Cardiopulmonary Dysfunction During Minimally Invasive Thoraco-Lumboendoscopic Spine Surgery

B. Vollmar, MD*, A. Olinger, MD{dagger}, U. Hildebrandt, MD{ddagger}, and M. D. Menger, MD*

*Institute for Clinical & Experimental Surgery and Departments of {dagger}Trauma Surgery and {ddagger}General Surgery, University of Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Germany

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Brigitte Vollmar, MD, The Center of Blood Research, Harvard Medical School, 200 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115. Address e-mail to vollmar @cbr.med.harvard.edu.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The endoscopic retroperitoneal approach to thoraco-lumbar anterior spine fusion is associated with CO2 insufflation into the thoracic space. We studied the cardiopulmonary effects of this CO2 thoraco-retroperitoneal insufflation compared with the conventional open surgical procedure using thoraco-phreno-lumbotomy in 12 pigs under balanced anesthesia, paralysis, and mechanical ventilation. During open surgery of the thoraco-lumbar spine, animals exhibited unchanged systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics, as well as ventilation and oxygenation variables. Animals retroperitoneally insufflated with CO2 (12 mm Hg) exhibited a significant increase of PaCO2 and a moderate decrease of PaO2, SaO2, and pH, with insignificant changes of central venous filling pressures and systemic hemodynamics. Endoscopic phrenotomy with thoracic CO2 insufflation instantaneously and drastically affected hemodynamic status and pulmonary gas exchange with marked hypoxia, hypercapnia, systemic hypotension, tachycardia, and pulmonary hypertension within minutes. An increase of minute ventilation, inspiratory oxygen fraction, and positive end-expiratory pressure promptly reversed these cardiopulmonary effects. CO2 evacuation allowed the animals to completely recover and regain almost baseline cardiopulmonary status, except for a reduced arterial blood pressure. Appropriate monitoring and immediate CO2 desufflation may be beneficial in cases of therapy-resistent hemodynamic, oxygenation, and ventilation difficulties.

Implications: For endoscopic thoraco-lumbar spine fusion, CO2 thoraco-retroperitoneum–induced cardiopulmonary dysfunction must be of concern, especially in patients with cardiopulmonary compromise. Appropriate monitoring and immediate CO2 desufflation may be beneficial in cases of therapy-resistant hemodynamic, oxygenation, and ventilation difficulties.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Recent advances in laparoscopic instrumentation and techniques have led to a remarkable development of minimally invasive surgical procedures involving virtually every organ. In lumbar spine surgery, an endoscopic transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach has been described for common procedures, such as discectomies, fusions, and corpectomies (1,2). Because the advantages of these minimally invasive procedures—namely, minor surgical trauma, reduced postoperative pain and hospitalization, smaller incisions, shorter recovery, and hastened return to normal activity—are evident, we were encouraged to pursue an endoscopic retroperitoneal approach for thoraco-lumbar spinal procedures.

During the performance of endoscopic anterior thoraco-lumbar spine fusion, the retroperitoneum and, after phrenotomy, the thoracic space is insufflated with CO2. This may similarily be the case if solely retroperitoneoscopic interventions, such as adrenalectomy, are complicated by accidental injury to the diaphragm. The influence of a CO2 thoracoretroperitoneum on lung compression, CO2 absorption, and cardiac function, however, is not yet known. Thus, we undertook the present study to analyze this new endoscopic procedure in terms of its hemodynamic and pulmonary effects because reports from laboratory and clinical studies have raised concerns about the effects of CO2 insufflation on cardiopulmonary functions (36).


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The experiments were approved by the German legislation on protection of animals and adhered to the guidelines for the handling of animals set by the National Institute of Health.

Twelve pigs of the Suabian Hall strain of either sex weighing 19–22 kg were sedated with azaperone (10 mg/kg body weight [BW] IM; Janssen, Neuss, Germany) and methomidate hydrochloride (10 mg/kg BW IM; Janssen), followed by the IV injection of etomidate (1 mg/kg BW; Janssen) for the induction of anesthesia. The trachea was intubated (7.5 mm inner diameter) and the animals were mechanically ventilated with an oxygen/nitrous oxide mixture (1:2 vol/vol). The inspired oxygen fraction (FIO2 0.21–0.30) was adjusted to maintain arterial PaO2 >110 mm Hg at baseline. At a respiratory rate of 12 breaths/min, tidal volume (180–200 mL) was adjusted to maintain ETCO2 at 35–45 mm Hg at baseline. Monitoring of peak inspiratory pressure revealed values <25 mm Hg, and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) was kept at 2 mm Hg to prevent atelectasis. For surgical instrumentation, the animals were placed in a supine position on an external heating pad to maintain the body at a constant temperature. Balanced anesthesia was achieved throughout the experiment by the IV infusion of piritramide (10 mg · kg-1 · h-1; Janssen) and dihydrobenzperidole (0.01 mg · kg-1 · h-1; Janssen), as well as by isoflurane in the inspired gas (1 vol%–2 vol%; Abboth, Wiesbaden, Germany). Throughout the experimental procedure, the animals were paralyzed by an IV infusion of pancuronium bromide (0.03 mg · kg-1 · h-1; CuramedPharma, Karlsruhe, Germany), and they received an isotonic saline solution (10 mL · kg-1 · h-1). As shown previously, this anesthetic regimen provides sufficient anesthetic depth and hemodynamic stability even under conditions of major surgical stress (7,8).

A flow-directed 5F thermistor-equipped catheter (SP5105; Viggo-Spectramed, Duesseldorf, Germany) was inserted through the left external jugular vein under continuous pressure monitoring into the pulmonary artery for determination of pulmonary hemodynamics, sampling of mixed venous blood, and measurement of temperature, central venous pressure, and cardiac output. A fine 17-gauge polyethylene catheter (Vygon, Écouen, France) was placed in the internal jugular vein for infusion of volume and administration of anesthetic drugs. In the left carotid artery, a 7F side-arm introducer sheath (AD Krauth, Hamburg, Germany) was used for determination of systemic arterial blood pressure and sampling of blood.

Arterial and mixed venous blood gases were measured using a Chiron gas analyzer (Chiron Diagnostics, St-Leon-Rot, Germany). Cardiac output was measured by the thermodilution technique and is reported as the mean values of triplicate injections of 3 mL of ice-cold saline solution. Heart rate and all pressures were measured with the pigs in right lateral position and the transducers zeroed to the midchest position using membrane pressure transducers (DTX/Plus®; Ohmeda, Erlangen, Germany). The amplified pressure signals, as well as the limb-leaded electrocardiogram, were continuously displayed and recorded.

After insertion of the catheters, all animals were positioned in right lateral recumbency. In the endoscopic group, retroperitoneal access was achieved after placement of three trocars and insufflation of CO2 at 12 mm Hg by an automatic insufflator, which guaranteed the maintenance of a pressure level of 12 mm Hg by appropriate adjustment of the gas flow. The diaphragm was then incised for exposure of the thoracic spine bodies at CO2 insufflation at a pressure of 12 mm Hg. After final exposure of the thoraco-lumbar spine bodies (T14–16 and L1–2), bisegmental instrumentation (anterior fusion) with a tricortical bone block and a dynamic compression plate (DCP; Synthes, Davos, Switzerland) was performed to simulate adequate treatment of anterior interbody fusion for spine fracture. The operative procedure was completed by wound closure.

In each pig undergoing the open surgical approach, a thoraco-phreno-lumbotomy was performed to allow complete exposure of the distal thoracic (T14–16) and proximal lumbar (L1–2) spine. Instrumentation of the spine bodies was similar to that in the endoscopic group, i.e., bisegmental anterior interbody spine fusion. The operative procedure was again completed by layer-to-layer wound closure.

Hemodynamic measurements were taken at 30 -min intervals throughout the operative procedure up to a total observation period of 4 h, after which the animals were killed by using a bolus infusion of potassium chloride. Sampling of blood for blood gas analysis was performed at 30-min intervals during the operation and at 60-min intervals after the end of the operation. After phrenotomy, which was performed approximately 50 min after start of the operation, additional monitoring of both hemodynamics and blood gases was performed within the 60- to 90-min period after start of the operation. The protocol included a total of five phases: baseline conditions, CO2 retroperitoneum, CO2 thoraco-retroperitoneum, CO2 thoraco-retroperitoneum with ventilatory adjustment, and release of CO2 thoraco-retroperitoneum.

The hemodynamic and respiratory variables assessed were mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), systolic arterial blood pressure (SAP), cardiac output (CO), heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), right (RVSW) and left ventricular stroke work (LVSW), rate pressure product (RPP), central venous pressure (CVP), mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP), diastolic pulmonary artery pressure (DPAP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), systemic (SVR) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), peak respiratory pressure (PRP), tidal volume, ventilatory frequency, and ETCO2, as well as arterial and mixed venous blood gases PO2, PCO2, pH, SO2. Moreover, CO2 insufflation pressure and, thus, retroperitoneal and intrathoracic pressure (after phrenotomy) was continuously monitored and kept at a constant level of 12 mm Hg.

SV was calculated as ([CO/HR] · 1000)mL; SVR as ([MAP-CVP] · [79.9/CO])dyne · s · cm-5; PVR as ([MPAP-PCWP] · [79.9/CO])dyne · s · cm-5; RVSW as ([SV · (MPAP-CVP)] · 0.0136)g; LVSW as ([SV · (MAP-PCWP)] · 0.0136)g; and RPP as (HR · SAP)mm Hg/min.

Ventilation settings were not adjusted unless a PaCO2 >=65 mm Hg or a PaO2 <=60 mm Hg was observed by using blood gas tension monitoring, at which time ventilator settings were adjusted by increasing ventilatory frequency up to 16–20 breaths/min, minute volume to 4–5 L/min, FIO2 to 100%, and PEEP to 5 mm Hg.

Data are reported as means ± SEM. An analysis of variance for repeated measures, followed by a post hoc comparison test (Dunnett) was performed to test the effects of time and retro- and thoraco-retroperitoneum on cardiopulmonary and blood gas variables, including correction of the {alpha} error according to the Bonferroni probabilities for repeated measurements. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals subjected to the open surgical procedure did not exhibit any significant changes of hemodynamic and ventilatory variables compared with baseline during the operative manipulation or up to 4 h after the operation (Tables 1 and 2). The anesthetic regimen and the ventilatory settings were kept constant throughout the whole observation period, i.e., no ventilatory adjustment was necessary in the control animals. The duration of the operative procedure ranged between 48 and 127 min.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Systemic and Pulmonary Hemodynamics in Ventilated Pigs During Open Thoraco-Retroperitoneal Anterior Spine Fusion
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Ventilation and Oxygenation Parameters in Ventilated Pigs During Open Thoraco-Retroperitoneal Anterior Spine Fusion
 
Compared with the open procedure, the complete endoscopic thoraco-retroperitoneal procedure lasted significantly longer (105–140 min). Although, during the first 50 min of the operation, CO2 insufflation was restricted solely to the retroperitoneal space, endoscopic phrenotomy then induced a CO2 thoraco-retroperitoneum, which was maintained until completion of instrumentation of the spine bodies.

Retroperitoneal insufflation of CO2 only influenced the PaCO2, with a significant increase from 41.8 ± 2.1 mm Hg at baseline to 51.9 ± 2.2 mm Hg, causing mild acidemia at 30 min of the 12- mm Hg CO2 retroperitoneum with a slight increase of ETCO2 (Fig. 1). No significant changes in PaO2 and SaO2 were observed although there was a tendency toward decreasing values (Fig. 1). The hemodynamic effects of the retroperitoneal CO2 insufflation were also of moderate magnitude. SV remained unchanged due to a moderate increase of HR (105%) and CO (113%). Systemic arterial pressure and central filling pressures (CVP, MPAP) were insignificantly increased by 6% and 13%, respectively (Figs. 2 and 3).



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Arterial blood gas parameters in ventilated pigs (n = 6) subjected to endoscopic thoraco-retroperitoneal anterior spine fusion. I = baseline (before operation), II = CO2 retroperitoneum, III = CO2 thoraco-retroperitoneum, IV = CO2 thoraco-retroperitoneum with ventilatory adjustment (fraction of inspired oxygen 100%, ventilatory rate 16–20 breaths/min, minute volume 4–5 L/min, positive end-expiratory pressure 5 mm Hg), V = CO2 evacuation. Values are means ± SEM. Analysis of variance for repeated measures, Dunnett's test with Bonferroni correction: *P < 0.05 versus values at time 0. PRP = peak respiratory pressure.

 


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Systemic hemodynamic parameters in ventilated pigs subjected to endoscopic thoraco-retroperitoneal anterior spine fusion (n = 6). MAP = mean arterial blood pressure, SAP = systolic arterial blood pressure, HR = heart rate, SV = stroke volume, CO = cardiac output, SVR = systemic vascular resistance, RPP = rate pressure product, LVSW = left ventricular stroke work. I = baseline (before operation), II = CO2 retroperitoneum, III = CO2 thoraco-retroperitoneum, IV = CO2 thoraco-retroperitoneum with ventilatory adjustment (fraction of inspired oxygen 100%, ventilatory rate 16–20 breaths/min, minute volume 4–5 L/min, positive end-expiratory pressure 5 mm Hg), V = CO2 evacuation. Values are means ± SEM. Analysis of variance for repeated measures, Dunnett's test with Bonferroni correction: *P < 0.05 versus values at time 0.

 


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Central venous and pulmonary hemodynamics in ventilated pigs subjected to endoscopic thoraco-retroperitoneal anterior spine fusion (n = 6). MPAP = mean pulmonary arterial blood pressure, DPAP = diastolic pulmonary arterial blood pressure, PCWP = pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, PVR = pulmonary vascular resistance, CVP = central venous blood pressure, RVSW = right ventricular stroke work. I = baseline (before operation), II = CO2 retroperitoneum, III = CO2 thoraco-retroperitoneum, IV = CO2 thoraco-retroperitoneum with ventilatory adjustment (fraction of inspired oxygen 100%, ventilatory rate 16–20 breaths/min, minute volume 4–5 L/min, positive end-expiratory pressure 5 mm Hg), V = CO2 evacuation. Values are means ± SEM. Analysis of variance for repeated measures, Dunnett's test with Bonferroni correction: *P < 0.05 versus values at time 0.

 
In contrast to the mild effects of the CO2 retroperitoneum, phrenotomy-associated thoracic CO2 insufflation instantaneously evoked adverse effects on ventilation and oxygenation variables, which were reproducible in all animals (Fig. 1). PRP significantly increased to a mean value of 37.2 ± 1.7 mm Hg (baseline 22.8 ± 1.7 mm Hg). Intermittent blood gas analysis revealed pronounced hypercapnia (PaCO2 68.7 ± 3.8 mm Hg), severe acidosis (pH 7.24 ± 0.01), and marked hypoxia (PaO2 50.8 ± 3.6 mm Hg). In parallel, SaO2 and SvO2 decreased as low as 82.6% ± 3.1% (Fig. 1) and 56.3% ± 4.9% (P < 0.05 versus baseline 75.6% ± 1.5%), respectively. The persistent hypercapnia, acidemia, and hypoxia were the result of the unchanged ventilatory variables at the start of thoracic CO2 insufflation. Moreover, thoracic CO2 insufflation had a pronounced impact on almost all systemic and pulmonary hemodynamic variables (Figs. 2 and 3). Besides a significant increase of central filling pressures (CVP 314%, MPAP 253%, and PCWP 254%) (Fig. 3), MAP significantly decreased as low as 69 ± 3 mm Hg (Fig. 2). Although SV significantly de- creased to 21.9 ± 2.6 mL, CO was maintained (3.0 ± 0.5 L/min versus baseline 3.0 ± 0.2 L/min), probably because of a compensatory tachycardia (131 ± 8 bpm versus baseline 85 ± 6 bpm) during CO2 thoraco-retroperitoneum (Fig. 2). The significant increase of PVR (313%) consequently caused an increase of RVSW (137%) (Fig. 3), which was only moderate due to the reduced SV. In contrast, LVSW declined significantly (41%) in response to a slight decrease of SVR (78%) and, in particular, to the pronounced reduction of SV (61%) (Fig. 2).

Ventilatory adjustment—increasing FIO2, minute volume, and PEEP to 1.0, 4–5 L/min, and 5 mm Hg, respectively—corrected most of the hemodynamic and pulmonary alterations (Figs. 1–3), except the PRP, which continued to increase to 40.5 ± 2.0 mm Hg. At 120 min, the time point before CO2 evacuation, the acid-base balance was restored, with a PaCO2 of 45.7 ± 4.9 mm Hg and a pH of 7.44 ± 0.01 (Fig. 1). CVP, MPAP, PCWP, and PVR decreased, but did not reach baseline values, at 120 min (Fig. 3). HR regained baseline values, but MAP and SV were not completely normalized with the ventilatory adjustments, and LVSW still significantly differed compared with baseline values (Fig. 2). During the following 120 min after final desufflation of the thoraco-retroperitoneum, reduced MAP persisted, whereas all other hemodynamic and pulmonary variables no longer significantly differed from baseline values (Figs. 2 and 3). Beside CO2 evacuation, nitrous oxide was again applied, PEEP was reduced to 2 mm Hg, and the respiratory rate and the tidal volume were reduced to 12 breaths/min and 180–200 ml, respectively. Thus, the control animals and the animals subjected to the endoscopic procedure differed in terms of ventilatory settings only during CO2 thoraco-retroperitoneum.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The thoraco-retroperitoneal approach for thoraco-lumbar spine fusion evaluated in this study includes CO2 exposure of both the retroperitoneal and thoracic space. Whereas the initial restriction of CO2 insufflation into the retroperitoneal space caused only moderate CO2 absorption-linked blood acidosis without affecting hemodynamic and pulmonary function, both mechanical effects—insufflation pressure-induced decrease in pulmonary distensibility and diffusion-linked pharmacodynamic properties of CO2—caused major hemodynamic and pulmonary dysfunction on diaphragmatic incision and thoracic CO2 exposure.

As observed endoscopically, the increase of intrathoracic pressure mechanically restricted inspiratory lung distension, mimicking the situation of a tension pneumothorax. The concomitant large increase in PRP can be explained only by a decreased pulmonary distensibility, because constant tidal volumes were delivered by the ventilator. A comparable but far smaller effect has been observed on peritoneal insufflation-induced increase of intraabdominal pressure and volume, both of which may cause restriction and displacement of diaphragmatic excursion with compression of basal lung segments (9). As a result, peak airway pressure increases, whereas pulmonary compliance and vital capacity decrease (6,9). Consequently, CO2 thoraco-retroperitoneum–induced pulmonary compression is manifested as a decrease in functional residual capacity with resultant alveolar collapse, i.e., perfused but not ventilated alveoli. The clinical picture of a tension pneumothorax can be mimicked by the CO2 insufflation during thoracoscopy, when the lung fails to deflate adequately (10); however, thoracoscopy is normally performed without gas and under one-lung ventilation (11,12). This compression-induced ventilation/perfusion mismatch may partially account for the present observation of acute and pronounced systemic hypoxemia. This is supported by experiments in pigs demonstrating that, with induced progressive tension pneumothorax, oxygen saturation decreased immediately and continued to decline throughout the experiment to levels <50% of baseline (13). Hypoxia, in turn, causes bronchoconstriction and potentiates bronchomotor responsiveness (14), thus aggravating gas maldistribution and ventilatory imbalance. In parallel to the steep decline of PaO2, PaCO2 increased at phrenotomy and thoracic CO2 insufflation. Beside hypoxia, it is conceivable that, in the present study, CO2-induced central chemoreceptor stimulation evoked the observed increase of lung and airway resistance, as similarly described after CO2 inhalation in sheep (15). Moreover, hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, which normally counteracts the superfluous perfusion of nonventilated alveoli (16), is hampered by hypercapnia (17), thereby augmenting the CO2 thoraco-retroperitoneum–induced pulmonary dysfunction. Considering Fick's law of diffusion, the increase of CO2 is most probably due to the rapid increase in area for diffusion of CO2 via direct gas exposure of the visceral and parietal pleurae (18). As with CO2 absorption from intraperitoneal insufflation (18) intrathoracic CO2 absorption might be limited, to some extent, because superficial pulmonary vasculature collapses when intrathoracic pressure increases above pulmonary capillary hydrostatic pressure, thereby diverting blood flow away from the pulmonary surface. However, the vascular collapse of remaining, still ventilated alveoli causes an increase of dead space ventilation with subsequent hypoxia and hypercapnia.

Moderate to severe hypercapnia, along with marked hypoxia, leads to sustained alterations in cardiac function. The observation of significantly increased central venous filling pressures but unchanged CO reflects a compensatory mechanism, as increasing HR offsets the effect of decreased left ventricular SV. Tachycardia might be not only a baroreceptor-mediated reflex response triggered by hypoxia-induced systemic hypotension, but also a reflex caused by hypercapnia-associated indirect stimulation of the autonomic nervous system with release of catecholamines (19). Considering the significant reduction of SV during thoracic CO2 insufflation, a myocardial-depressant direct effect of hypercapnia-associated acidemia (20) seems to dominate over the theoretical catecholamine-associated increase of myocardial contractility (20). The concomitant decrease of SVR may underlie the predominance of direct myocardial effects of CO2. CO2 would, however, normally increase coronary blood flow (21), but coronary perfusion pressure must be suspected to decrease because systemic hypotension occurred together with pulmonary hypertension. This view is supported by experiments in newborn piglets, which demonstrate that the combination of hypoxia/hypercapnia with a tension pneumothorax blunted the increase of myocardial perfusion normally observed with hypoxia/hypercapnia alone (22). Thus, with respect to tachycardia-induced increase of cardiac oxygen demand and the concomitant shortage of coronary filling time (19), there will be an unfavorable balance between myocardial oxygen demand and supply.

Secondary to hypoxia and hypercapnia (13), the marked depression of systemic hemodynamics might additionally result from an equalization of the thoracic insufflation pressure and the central venous filling pressures. Partial collapse of large intrathoracic veins, as well as pressure on the pulmonary arteries with increased right ventricular afterload, may have resulted in increased central venous pressure with reduced venous return to the right heart (23,24). Increased right ventricular afterload coincided with the calculation of increased RVSW in the present study. A lung compression-associated increase in pulmonary arterial pressure and vascular resistance also leads to a decrease in pulmonary venous return to the left atrium, contributing to the compromised stroke volume (23,24). The differences in hemodynamic variables before and after ventilatory adjustment were achieved not only by reversal of hypoxia and hypercapnia, but also by expansion of the lungs and an increase in airway pressure. This, in turn, indicates that the observed hemodynamic and cardiopulmonary aberrations seem to be the net result of combined mechanical, vascular, and pharmacodynamic effects on thoracic CO2 insufflation. The present study cannot elucidate the operative mechanisms with respect to ventilation, oxygenation, and hemodynamic dysfunction, which must be evaluated in further experiments, allowing differentiation between right- and left-sided causes, as well as between metabolically induced reduction of myocardial contractility versus reduced preload from vascular collapse as the cause for hemodynamic compromise. However, we show that the cardiovascular consequences during the combined CO2 thoraco-retroperitoneum are significant and clinically important.

In summary, thoraco-lumboendoscopic spine surgery is associated with marked hemo- and cardiodynamic and pulmonary deteriorations on thoracic CO2 insufflation. Rapid respiratory decompensation, i.e., hypoxemia from impaired gas exchange, with net alveolar hypoventilation and transpulmonary CO2 absorption precede, and imply, a potential metabolic basis for the hemodynamic compromise. Preload reduction due to a mechanical effect with mediastinal shift, kinking, and obstruction or collapse of thoracic vessels might be an additional cause of hemodynamic compromise. Rutherford et al. (25) studied the hemodynamic responses to pneumothoraces in goats and found that vascular causes seem to play a secondary role for the hemodynamic effects compared with ventilation/oxygenation insufficiency. Although we showed that the adverse effects of CO2 thoraco-retroperitoneum on pulmonary and cardiovascular function could largely be corrected intraoperatively by adjusting mechanical ventilation, this study underlines the need for sufficient hemodynamic monitoring, particularly in patients with inadequate cardiac reserves due to cardiovascular disease, and for prompt CO2 evacuation in cases of therapy-resistant cardiopulmonary complications.


    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by the Association for Laparoscopic Spine Surgery, Homburg.

We thank Prof. Mertzlufft for the fruitful discussion.


    Footnotes
 
BV is supported by a Heisenberg Stipendium of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Vo 450/6-1).


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Southerland SR, Remedios AM, McKerrell JG, Litwin D. Laparoscopic approaches to the lumbar vertebrae. Spine 1995;20:1620–3.[Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Olinger A, Hildebrandt U, Pistorius G, et al. Laparoscopic two-level interbody fusion of the lumbar spine with Bagby and Kuslich (BAK) implants. Chirurg 1996;67:348–50.[Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Ivankovitch AD, Miletich DJ, Albrecht RF, et al. Cardiovascular effects of intraperitoneal insufflation with carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide in the dog. Anesthesiology 1975;42:281–7.[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Wittgen CM, Andrus CH, Fitzgerald SD, et al. Analysis of the hemodynamic and ventilatory effects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 1991;126:997–1001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Joris JL, Noirot DP, Legrand MJ, et al. Hemodynamic changes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 1993;76:1067–71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Johannsen G, Andersen M, Juhl B. The effect of general anaesthesia on the hemodynamic event during laparoscopy with CO2 insufflation. Anaesthesiol Scand 1989;33:132–6.
  7. Vollmar B, Conzen PF, Habazettl H, et al. Heparin-protamine reactions in pigs: role of oxygen-derived free radicals. J Appl Physiol 1993;74:2412–20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Vollmar B, Bay W, Oezbek C, et al. Experimental intracoronary stenting: comprehensive experience in a porcine model. Lab Anim 1998;32:191–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Puri GD, Singh H. Ventilatory effects of laparoscopy under general anaesthesia. Anaesth 1992;68:211–3.
  10. Peden CJ, Prys-Roberts C. Capnothorax: implications for the anaesthetist. Anaesthesia 1993;48:664–6.[Web of Science][Medline]
  11. Shaw AD, Mitchell JB. Anaesthesia for video-assisted thoracoscopic patent ductus arteriosus ligation. Anaesthesia 1998;53:914–7.[Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Tseng CC, Wu MH, Day YB, Chang CL. Clinical application of transorotracheal tube tracheal insufflation of oxygen in patients undergoing simple video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Anesth Analg 1997;84:20–5.[Abstract]
  13. Barton ED, Rhee P, Hutton KC, Rosen P. The pathophysiology of tension pneumothorax in ventilated swine. Emerg Med 1997;15:147–53.
  14. Green M, Widdicombe JG. The effects of ventilation of dogs with different gas mixtures on airway calibre and lung mechanics. J Physiol (Lond) 1966;186:363–81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Perez-Fontan JJ, Kinloch LP, Donelly DF. Integration of bronchomotor and ventilatory responses to chemoreceptor stimulation in developing sheep. Respir Physiol 1998;111:1–13.[Web of Science][Medline]
  16. von Euler US, Liljestrand G. Observations on the pulmonary arterial blood pressure in the cat. Acta Physiol Scand 1946;12:301–5.
  17. Yamaguchi K, Suzuki K, Naoki K, et al. Response of intra-acinar pulmonary microvessels to hypoxia, hypercapnic acidosis, and isocapnic acidosis. Circ Res 1998;82:722–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Lister DR, Rudston-Brown B, Warriner B, et al. Carbon dioxide absorption is not linearly related to intraperitoneal carbon dioxide insufflation pressure in pigs. Anesthesiology 1994;80:129–36.[Web of Science][Medline]
  19. Rasmussen JP, Dauchot PJ, DePalma RG, et al. Cardiac function and hypercarbia. Arch Surg 1978;113:1196–200.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Price HL. Effects of carbon dioxide on the cardiovascular system. Anesthesiology 1960;21:652–63.[Web of Science][Medline]
  21. Case RB, Greenberg H. The response of canine coronary vascular resistance to local alterations in coronary arterial pCO2. Circ Res 1976;39:558–66.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Brann BS, Mayfield SR, Goldstein M, et al. Cardiovascular effects of hypoxia/hypercarbia and tension pneumothorax in newborn piglets. Crit Care Med 1994;22:1453–60.[Web of Science][Medline]
  23. Brecher GA, Hubay CA. Pulmonary blood flow and venous return during spontaneous respiration. Circ Res 1955;3:210–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Simmons DH, Linde LM, Miller JH. Relation between lung volume and pulmonary vascular resistance. Res 1961;9:465–71.
  25. Rutherford RB, Hurt HH Jr, Brickman RD, Tubb JM. The pathophysiology of progressive tension pneumothorax. J Trauma 1968;8:212–27.[Web of Science][Medline]
Accepted for publication February 22, 1999.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vollmar, B.
Right arrow Articles by Menger, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vollmar, B.
Right arrow Articles by Menger, M. D.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 1999 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press