| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||

Departments of
*Anesthesiology and
Surgery, University of Maryland Medical School, Baltimore, MD
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Timothy B. Gilbert, MD, FACC, Division of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology, Room S11-C10, 22 South Greene St., Baltimore, MD 21201-1595. Address e-mail to tgilbert{at}anesth.ab.umd.edu
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Case Report |
|---|
|
|
|---|
20 cm H2O). The initial videoscopic inspection of the pleural cavity revealed poor nondependent lung collapse; therefore, FOB was repeated several times, confirming no significant change in the EBT position. In addition, the patient's positioning on the operative table (i.e., extent of flexion and rotation) was adjusted several times to assist the surgeon's views. Twice, ventilation was discontinued and the EBT advanced slightly with both cuffs deflated, then reinflated. Ultimately, intermittent apneic oxygenation was required to achieve acceptable lung collapse for accessing the retropleural space. No significant change in hemodynamic variables was noted throughout. One hour later, during mobilization of mediastinal and paraesophageal tissues, a dark, spherical, cystic-appearing structure was discovered emanating between the esophagus and trachea in the mediastinum (Fig. 1). During dissection in preparation for biopsy of this mass, the surgical team realized that this artifact was the blue-colored endobronchial cuff protruding laterally from a ruptured left mainstem bronchus and into the right pleural space. An urgent open thoracotomy was performed to oversew the bronchial injury and to apply an intercostal muscle flap to enhance the air seal. During repair, the EBT was advanced manually under FOB guidance beyond the site of bronchial injury. A postrepair FOB showed adequate surgical closure of the bronchus with minimal luminal narrowing. The esophageal tumor ultimately was found quite distant from the site of the bronchial injury. After completion of the planned staging procedure, the patient was allowed to emerge from anesthesia and was tracheally extubated without difficulty. No subcutaneous emphysema, pneumomediastinum, or pneumothorax was noted postoperatively, and the patient had an otherwise uneventful recovery. She was discharged on Postoperative Day 4.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Factors that seem to increase the risk of injury by an EBT include: use of an undersized tube that requires excessive cuff inflation (3); use of tube too large for a patient's mainstem bronchial lumen (4); malposition of the tip of the tube (5); rapid cuff inflation (6); use of older tubes with low-compliance cuffs (red rubber) or carinal hooks (e.g., Carlens or White tubes) (4); use of adjuncts such as bronchial blockers (7) or tube-exchangers (8); the presence of invasive disease of the airways (2,6); use in patients at the extremes of age (2,7); and use of N2O (4,6). In this particular patient, none of these risk factors were present. The mechanism of injury was undoubtedly either direct injury by the tip of the EBT during its initial placement (or manipulations) or by later injury secondary to inflation of the distal cuff. Unfortunately, there is no way to determine which of these occurred because the poor collapse of the nondependent lung was not noted until the surgeon entered the chest, some time after EBT placement.
Tracheobronchial injury during thoracoscopy has not been previously reported. Thoracoscopy could increase the risk of such an injury for several reasons. First, because thoracoscopy requires exquisite lung collapse for good visualization, more manipulations of the EBT (e.g., repositioning, inflations, or deflations of the cuffs, or FOB) may be necessary than with an open thoracotomy. Second, carbon dioxide insufflation (9) could cause more rapid or complete lung collapse and excessive torsion on at-risk airway structures. Third, depending on the area of the thorax being examined, the patient and operative table often require readjustment to optimize the surgeon's view. Finally, because of the field of view and variability in quality of the videoscopic image, diagnosis of an injury may be somewhat delayed, as was the case in this patient. Because thoracoscopy is generally performed in a darkened room, recognition of certain physical signs (e.g., cyanosis, subcutaneous emphysema) can be problematic. For these reasons, use of endobronchial intubation and single-lung ventilation should be performed with substantial vigilance during thoracoscopy in order to detect or possibly prevent similar airway injury.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. W. Thomsen Mediastinoscopy and Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: Anesthetic Pitfalls and Complications Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, June 1, 2008; 12(2): 128 - 132. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Lee and H. G. Colt A Spray Catheter Technique for Pleural Anesthesia: A Novel Method for Pain Control Before Talc Poudrage Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2007; 104(1): 198 - 200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Migliore, R. Giuliano, T. Aziz, R. A. Saad, and F. Sgalambro Four-Step Local Anesthesia and Sedation for Thoracoscopic Diagnosis and Management of Pleural Diseases* Chest, June 1, 2002; 121(6): 2032 - 2035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Slinger Lung isolation in thoracic anesthesia, state of the art Can J Anesth, June 1, 2001; 48(90001): R3 - 3. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ovassapian, J. M. Klafta, and T. B. Gilbert Bronchial Injury: An Avoidable Complication During Bronchial Intubation Response Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2000; 90(6): 1458 - 1459. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. V. Roth and T. B. Gilbert Another Potential Factor That May Cause Bronchial Rupture by a Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tube • Response Anesth. Analg., December 1, 1999; 89(6): 1591 - 1591. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|