JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malov, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malov, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C. V.
Anesth Analg 1999;89:538
© 1999 International Anesthesia Research Society

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Intrathecal Catheter as a Secondary Prophylaxis of Postdural Puncture Headache

Stanislav S. Malov, MD

Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston, MA 02115

I read with great interest the case report by Bucklin et al. (1). The authors describe an uncommon situation and very intelligently discuss its management. I would like to point out, however, that one valuable option was missed in the Discussion, namely insertion of the intrathecal catheter at the time inadvertent dural puncture was recognized.

On insertion of the intrathecal catheter, analgesia/anesthesia is provided with a reduced rate of infusion, and the catheter is removed 24 h postinsertion. It has been speculated that foreign body inflammation around the catheter facilitates the closure of the dural defect, thus decreasing headache. This practice was described for obstetric patients (2,3) and was recently accepted at our institution. Maintenance of the intrathecal catheter for a period of 24 h allowed us to reduce the requirement for epidural blood patch by half (4).

Because this practice requires maintenance of the catheter for only 8–16 additional hours, the risk of infection complications seems to be minimal, making it worth considering even in immunocompromised patients.

References

  1. Bucklin B, Tinker JH, Smith CV. Clinical dilemma: a patient with postdural puncture headache and acute leukemia. Anesth Analg 1999;88:166–7.[Free Full Text]
  2. Cohen S, Amar D, Pantuck EJ, et al. Decreased incidence of headache after accidental dural puncture in caesarean delivery patients receiving continuous postoperative intrathecal analgesia. Anaesthesiol Scand 1994;38:716–8.
  3. Dennehy KC, Rosaeg OP. Intrathecal catheter insertion during labour reduces the risk of post-dural puncture headache. Can J Anaesth 1998;45:42–5.[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Segal S, Tsen LC, Datta S. Intrathecal catheter insertion following unintentional dural puncture reduces the requirement for epidural blood patch [abstract]. Anesthesiology 1999. Abstracts of SOAP papers.
 

Response

Brenda A. Bucklin, MD John H. Tinker, MD

Department of Anesthesiology University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha, NE 68198-4455

Carl V. Smith, MD

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha, NE 68198-4455

We appreciate Malov’s comments regarding our article (1). Because the initial epidural attempt was not difficult and subarachnoid catheter insertion after accidental dural puncture is often reserved for patients with difficult placement or those at risk of repeat dural puncture, continuous spinal analgesia was not considered. Norris and Leighton (2) reported no difference in the incidence of headache in patients receiving either continuous spinal or epidural analgesia after accidental dural puncture. However, a retrospective review (3) suggested a decreased incidence of postdural puncture headache in obstetric patients after indwelling subarachnoid catheterization for >24 h. In addition, anecdotal reports (4) suggest a benefit of postoperative subarachnoid catheterization in patients undergoing cesarean section. Additional prospective, controlled studies are required to confirm the safety and efficacy of prolonged subarachnoid catheterization.

References

  1. Bucklin BA, Tinker JH, Smith CV. Clinical dilemma: a patient with postdural puncture headache and acute leukemia. Anesth Analg 1999;88:166–7.
  2. Norris MC, Leighton BL. Continuous spinal anesthesia after unintentional dural puncture in parturients. Reg Anesth 1990;15:285–7.[Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Cohen S, Amar D, Pantuck J, et al. Decreased incidence of headache after accidental dural puncture in caesarean delivery patients receiving continuous postoperative intrathecal analgesia. Anaesthesiol Scand 1994;38:716–8.
  4. Dennehy KC, Rosaeg OP. Intrathecal catheter insertion during labour reduces the risk of post-dural puncture headache. Can J Anaesth 1998;45:42–5.




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malov, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malov, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C. V.

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press