| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Department of Anesthesia, New England Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Roman Schumann, MD, Department of Anesthesia, New England Medical Center, Box 298, 750 Washington St., Boston, MA 02111. Address e-mail to roman.schumann{at}es.nemc.org
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Case Report |
|---|
|
|
|---|
General anesthesia was induced using a rapid sequence technique because of obesity. The patient's trachea was intubated using a Miller 3 blade and a 7.0 styletted endotracheal tube on the first attempt without difficulty or evident trauma. An orogastric tube was easily placed after intubation for gastric decompression, and it was removed before extubation. Anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane in 60% nitrous oxide, fentanyl, and vecuronium. At the end of surgery, the neuromuscular blockade was reversed, the patient awakened, and the trachea was extubated. Ondansetron was administered because of nausea.
Fifteen minutes after arriving in the postanesthesia care unit, the patient experienced an episode of nausea and retching, and she vomited a small amount of gastric contents. Within 10 min of this event, she complained of a "funny feeling" in her neck and throat. Physical examination revealed anterior chest wall crepitus and swelling caused by subcutaneous emphysema, which, within minutes, spread cephalad to the neck and face up to the level of the eyebrows. No dyspnea, oxygen desaturation, or hemodynamic instability was noted at this time. A portable chest radiograph showed a pneumomediastinum and massive bilateral subcutaneous emphysema of the neck and chest wall (Figure 1). A pneumothorax was not present. Within the next several minutes, the patient's voice became increasingly high pitched, and she experienced more difficulty speaking. Because of the concern for impending airway compromise, fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation with a 6.0 tube was rapidly performed to secure the airway. Through the fiberoptic bronchoscope, the pharynx and supraglottic structures appeared very swollen and distorted down to the aryepiglottic folds. The vocal cords and the trachea to the level of the carina appeared normal.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema resulting from alveolar rupture can occur after forceful vomiting. Increased alveolar pressure, produced by a valsalva maneuver during vomiting, may cause alveolar rupture into the interstitium of the lung. From there, air travels along the pulmonary vascular sheaths, where it enters the mediastinum and then dissects through the soft tissue planes of the neck, producing the subcutaneous emphysema. This has been demonstrated in experimental animals and in humans (1,2). Several other cases have been reported, but none describe the development of severe airway compromise (58). These cases are notable for their lack of sequelae and their spontaneous resolution. This is in contradistinction to most reported cases of Boerhaave's syndrome, in which leakage of esophageal and gastric contents into the mediastinum often causes mediastinitis with its attendant complications (3,4). Its classical presentation consists of the triad of vomiting, chest pain, and subcutaneous emphysema, although not all of these symptoms are present in many cases (3,4). Most authors agree that the high incidence of morbidity and mortality can be reduced by early diagnosis and aggressive surgical treatment; however, there are several reports of successful conservative management when leakage from the esophagus is minimal or has abated (911). Because of the potentially insidious nature of a small esophageal tear, it is possible that the site of rupture in our patient was impossible to locate (12).
Other causes of subcutaneous emphysema in the perioperative period include trauma to the pharynx, esophagus, or trachea from laryngoscopy, intubation, overinflation of the endotracheal tube cuff, or gastric tube placement (13,14). In our patient, there was no indication that any of these procedures were difficult or caused any trauma, although occult injury cannot be entirely excluded. An initial site of injury in the pharynx or hypopharynx is unlikely in this case, because the emphysema began in the chest wall and, from there, spread cranially to the neck and head and finally produced symptoms in the airway. Furthermore, the patient's symptoms did not develop after intubation and gastric tube placement, despite several hours of positive pressure ventilation, but developed rapidly, immediately after her episode of forceful retching and vomiting, suggesting a causal relationship between those events. No pharyngeal or airway lesion was identified, although one may have been obscured by the significant swelling caused by the emphysema.
In the absence of a demonstrable lesion, it was impossible to definitively establish the etiology of this patient's symptoms, but alveolar rupture is the most likely etiology. The impending loss of airway was successfully averted by immediate awake fiberoptic intubation, which may offer the best visualization of the airway and may be the easiest and least traumatic method to intubate the trachea in this situation.
We conclude that subcutaneous emphysema, with extension into the soft tissue planes of the supraglottic airway, can be a rare complication of postoperative vomiting. Within minutes, this may lead to airway compromise, which may be heralded by a change in the voice. This must be promptly recognized to successfully secure the airway before distortion of the anatomy makes intubation more difficult or impossible. Investigation to identify a potential tracheoesophageal injury is warranted; if not present, alveolar rupture is the most likely diagnosis and will resolve spontaneously.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. H. Wender Do current antiemetic practices result in positive patient outcomes? Results of a new study Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., January 1, 2009; 66(1_Supplement_1): S3 - S10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Diemunsch, T. J. Gan, B. K. Philip, M. J. Girao, L. Eberhart, M. G. Irwin, J. Pueyo, J. E. Chelly, A. D. Carides, T. Reiss, et al. Single-dose aprepitant vs ondansetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a randomized, double-blind Phase III trial in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2007; 99(2): 202 - 211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Burlacu, D. Healy, D. J. Buggy, C. Twomey, D. Veerasingam, A. Tierney, and D. C. Moriarty Continuous Gastric Decompression for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Coronary Revascularization Surgery Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2005; 100(2): 321 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Apfel, K. Korttila, M. Abdalla, H. Kerger, A. Turan, I. Vedder, C. Zernak, K. Danner, R. Jokela, S. J. Pocock, et al. A Factorial Trial of Six Interventions for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting N. Engl. J. Med., June 10, 2004; 350(24): 2441 - 2451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Sanchez-Ledesma, L. Lopez-Olaondo, F. J. Pueyo, F. Carrascosa, and A. Ortega A Comparison of Three Antiemetic Combinations for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2002; 95(6): 1590 - 1595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Apfel, P. Kranke, L. H. J. Eberhart, A. Roos, and N. Roewer Comparison of predictive models for postoperative nausea and vomiting Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2002; 88(2): 234 - 240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Irefin, I. S. Farid, and A. J. Senagore Urgent Colectomy in a Patient with Membranous Tracheal Disruption After Severe Vomiting Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2000; 91(5): 1300 - 1302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|