Anesth Analg 1999;89:1075
© 1999 International Anesthesia Research Society
EDITORIAL
A Drug Has To Do What a Drug Has To Do
Tony L. Yaksh, PhD
Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, San Diego, California
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Tony L. Yaksh, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093-0818.
In their case report, Soliman et al. (1) sought to use baclofen as an analgesic adjuvant in children undergoing elective dorsal rhizotomy for the management of spasticity. At the doses used, there was an amelioration of pain, and this was accompanied in two patients by transient (2 h) paralysis and, in one case, sensory loss.
The rationale behind the use of baclofen, a -aminobutyric acid- (GABA) B agonist, is based on a prevalent preclinical literature that has shown that the spinal GABA-B receptor can regulate the response to acute high-intensity input (24), the facilitated pain state that is generated by tissue injury (5) and the component of the hyperalgesia and allodynia that arises from nerve or spinal injury (68). Importantly, these antinociceptive effects have also been observed in primate behavioral models (9). The mechanism of these actions is not fully understood, but the intrathecal agonist and antagonist pharmacology indicates the role of spinal GABA-B receptors.
In the spinal cord, GABA-B binding is present throughout the spinal gray matter with a maximal concentration in Lamina II of the dorsal horn. Dorsal rhizotomy reduces dorsal, but not ventral, horn GABA-B binding (10). Binding studies have shown high levels of such binding in the substantia gelatinosa (see above references). GABA-B binding has been demonstrated in both the dorsal and the ventral gray matter of the spinal cord. Capsaicin treatment results in a reduction in GABA-B binding (11). These observations suggest that a proportion of the GABA-B binding sites are on certain populations of small primary afferents and that GABA-B agonists may regulate the excitability of the primary afferent terminal and reduce the release of transmitter from those terminals. Such a reduction in the evoked release of substance P or calcitonin gene related peptide (12,13) and a reduced internalization of the neurokinin 1 receptors has indeed been identified (14), although others have failed to show such changes in release with moderate baclofen concentrations (15,16). Consistent with this association, spinal baclofen produces a dose-dependent inhibition of the C, but not A, fiber-evoked activity in dorsal wide dynamic range neurons (17). These observations account for effects that may be mediated by small afferent input (e.g., after acute high intensity stimulation and tissue injury). The effects of GABA-B activity at the spinal level are not certain. In the face of transient withdrawal of GABA-A activity, a hyperalgesia and tactile allodynia is clearly evident (18). Blocking the GABA-B receptor has no such allodynic effect. Accordingly, it is not clear whether the loss of GABAergic tone, as reported after nerve injury (19,20), reflects that there is an intrinsic role for GABA-B receptors in regulating the postnerve-injury state.
Of particular interest, GABA-B agonists may regulate the spinal release of excitatory amino acids (21). Such a reduction in glutamate release would be consistent with the preclinical behavioral effects of intrathecal baclofen in the hyperalgesia and allodynia associated with models of nerve and tissue injury (22).
It should be stressed that, although the GABA-B receptor can have potent effects on sensory processing, it significantly affects motor function. Its ability to hyperpolarize motor horn cells and reduce by a presynaptic action the excitatory postsynaptic potentials in motor neurons made by IA sensory afferents (23), as well as the direct hyperpolarization of the second order membrane, likely accounts, in part, for the potent inhibitory effect on motor horn excitability that correlates with the therapeutic effect on spasticity. Even in the first study, which examined the effect of spinal baclofen, it was emphasized that the antinociceptive effects were accompanied at the upper end of the antinociceptive dose effect curve by the observation of hind limb weakness leading to an extreme, but reversible, weakness (2). Thus, there has always been a question of whether the spinal effects on sensory processing could be separated from the changes in motor function.
Given the profound effects observed with GABA-B agonists in the animal models, it has been somewhat puzzling that a comparable profound analgesia has not been routinely reported with baclofen in humans. Baclofen probably ranks as one agent that has been given spinally with great frequency because of the therapeutic advantage that arises from regulating the enhanced motor tone associated with spasticity (24), a clear clinical expression of the preclinical observations made first in 1978. Despite this frequency, it has been difficult to define an analgesic effect in humans. A few reports that have appeared suggest that baclofen may be useful in some neuropathic pain expressions (2527). As in the rodent studies, it may be argued that i) the pain relief may arise because of the reduction in the pain otherwise generated by the continuously contracted musculature, or ii) the dose required to produce muscle relaxation in spasticity may be substantially smaller than those doses required to alter nociceptive processing and that the clinician is loathe to exceed the therapeutic dose necessary for muscle relaxation to avoid tolerance.
Thus, in the context of the present brief report regarding baclofen and muscle weakness, it would seem that a drug has to do what a drug has to do. The present case series does, however, leave many issues unresolved. It seems clear that the patients did receive significant pain relief, equivalent to that associated with intrathecal fentanyl. This is consistent with at least the growing case literature. The unintended, profound flaccidity is one that provides no insight one way or the other. At the time of surgery, the delivery of a bolus injection of baclofen might be anticipated to effect motor function that is dose-dependent. We do not know the intrathecal distribution of baclofen. It is known that, in adults, the size of the thecal sac can vary significantly between individuals, and that can lead to differing local concentrations of the drug (such as tetracaine) given by that route and different magnitudes of local anesthesia (28). It is possible that, in these spinal cords, such a difference in distributional properties might account for the different and, in some cases, unexpectedly intense physiological effects. Alternatively, it is clear that neurodegenerative disorders may lead to changes in neuronal net function and differential drug sensitivity. In other words, the apparent changes in baclofen sensitivity may reflect a specific characteristic of that spinal cord with which the extreme drug effect was noted. The only manner in which this issue can be approached is by the use of a systematic dose analysis or by an opportunity to titrate the baclofen dosing, which may be achieved with a catheter placed at the time of surgery. This poses an additional opportunity for potential complications.
Other drug modalities that might be theoretically considered include the use of longer lasting opiates such as morphine or methadone, the 2 agonist clonidine, or an N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) antagonist such as ketamine. There are several theoretical arguments for the use of such drugs. The pain states are clearly opiate sensitive (if fentanyl really does produce a spinal action that is sustained when given in this manner). It should be emphasized that opiates can induce a myoclonus, possibly mediated in part by a direct effect on motor horn inhibitory interneurons or through active metabolites (29,30). Methadone is more lipid soluble than morphine, but has a long t1/2ß half-life. Interestingly, the racemic mixture of methadone consists of the active opiate agonist (d-methadone). The L-isomer is not an opiate, but has been shown to have significant NMDA antagonistic properties (31,32). Facilitated pain states secondary to nerve and tissue injury are regulated in part by spinal NMDA receptors (22). Intrathecal d-methadone has antihyperalgesic actions (33). Spinal 2 receptors have a potent effect on small afferent input and are also known to strongly reduce excitatory amino acid release (34). Behaviorally, spinal 2 agonists in animal models (35) and in humans (36) have potent antiallodynic effects. Of additional interest, in animal models, large doses of clonidine will produce muscle weakness and reduce motoneuron excitability in rats with spinal injury (37) and has been used in humans to control spasticity (38,39).
In summary, Soliman et al. (1) probably did, in fact, observe an amelioration of the pain state. The origin of this pain state is clearly complex and it is not clear how the effects of baclofen on pain can be interpreted. Thus, the postoperative pain arises not only from the tissue trauma, but from the acute changes induced by sectioning of the nerve itself. The "side effect" of flaccidity with baclofen is not surprising and little can be made of the sensitivity of these patients to baclofen as only a limited dose range was examined. The lack of information on the kinetics of the spinal space after such a surgery in such children further complicate the issue. Nevertheless, it raises some limited hope that appropriate attention to dosing and to the considerations of other spinal pharmacological approaches might provide an alternative means to address this postneurectomy/postoperative pain state.
References
-
Soliman IE, Park TS, Maura C, Berkelhamer . Transient paralysis after intrathecal bolus of baclofen for the treatment of post-selective dorsal rhizotomy pain. Analg 1999;89:12335.[Free Full Text]
-
Wilson PR, Yaksh TL. Baclofen is antinociceptive in the spinal intrathecal space of animals. Eur J Pharmacol 1978;51:32330.[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Aran S, Hammond DL. Antagonism of baclofen-induced antinociception by intrathecal administration of phaclofen or 2-hydroxy-saclofen, but not delta-aminovaleric acid in the rat. J Pharmacol Exper Ther 1991;257:3608.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hammond DL, Drower EJ. Effects of intrathecally administered THIP, baclofen and muscimol on nociceptive threshold. Eur J Pharmacol 1984;103:1215.[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Dirig DM, Yaksh TL. Intrathecal baclofen and muscimol, but not midazolam, are antinociceptive using the rat-formalin model. J Pharmacol Exper Thera 1995;275:21927.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Yamamoto T, Yaksh TL. Spinal pharmacology of thermal hyperesthesia induced by incomplete ligation of sciatic nerve. I. Opioid and nonopioid receptors. Anesthesiology 1991;75:81726.[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Hao J-X, Xu X-J, Wiesenfeld-Hallin Z. Intrathecal gamma-aminobutyric acidB (GABAB) receptor antagonist CGP 35348 induces hypersensitivity to mechanical stimuli in the rat. Neurosci Lett 1994;182:299302.[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Hwang JH, Yaksh TL. The effect of spinal GABA receptor agonists on tactile allodynia in a surgically-induced neuropathic pain model in the rat. Pain 1997;70:1522.[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Yaksh TL, Reddy SV. Studies in the primate on the analgetic effects associated with intrathecal actions of opiates, alpha-adrenergic agonists and baclofen. Anesthesiology 1981;54:45167.[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Price GW, Kelly JS, Bowery NG. The location of GABAB receptor binding sites in mammalian spinal cord. Synapse 1987;1:5308.[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Teoh H, Malcangio M, Bowery NG. GABA, glutamate and substance P-like immunoreactivity release: effects of novel GABAB antagonists. Br J Pharmacol 1996;118:115360.[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Holz GG 4th, Kream RM, Spiegel A, Dunlap K. G proteins couple alpha-adrenergic and GABAb receptors to inhibition of peptide secretion from peripheral sensory neurons. J Neurosci 1989;9:65766.[Abstract]
-
Teoh H, Malcangio M, Fowler LJ, Bowery NG. Evidence for release of glutamic acid, aspartic acid and substance P but not gamma-aminobutyric acid from primary afferent fibres in rat spinal cord. Eur J Pharmacol 1996;302:2736.[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Marvizon JC, Grady EF, Stefani E, et al. Substance P release in the dorsal horn assessed by receptor internalization: NMDA receptors counteract a tonic inhibition by GABA(B) receptors. Eur J Neurosci 1999;11:41726.[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Go VLW, Yaksh TL. Release of substance P from the cat spinal cord. J Physiol 1987;391:14167.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bourgoin S, Pohl M, Benoliel JJ, et al. Gamma-Aminobutyric acid, through GABAA receptors, inhibits the potassium-stimulated release of calcitonin gene-related peptide, but not that of substance P-like material from rat spinal cord slices. Brain Res 1992;583:3448.[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Dickenson AH, Brewer CM, Hayes NA. Effects of topical baclofen on C fibre-evoked neuronal activity in the rat dorsal horn. Neuroscience 1985;14:55762.[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Yaksh TL. Behavioral and autonomic correlates of the tactile evoked allodynia produced by spinal glycine inhibition: effects of modulatory receptor systems and excitatory amino acid antagonists. Pain 1989;37:11123.[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Castro-Lopes JM, Tavares I, Coimbra A. GABA decreases in the spinal cord dorsal horn after peripheral neurectomy. Brain Res 1993;620:28791.[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Ibuki T, Hama AT, Wang XT, et al. Loss of GABA-immunoreactivity in the spinal dorsal horn of rats with peripheral nerve injury and promotion of recovery by adrenal medullary grafts. Neuroscience 1997;76:84558.[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Bonanno G, Fassio A, Sala R, et al. GABA(B) receptors as potential targets for drugs able to prevent excessive excitatory amino acid transmission in the spinal cord. Eur J Pharmacol 1998;362:1438.[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Yaksh TL. Preclinical models of nociception. In: Yaksh TL, Lynch III C, Zapol WM, et al., eds.Anesthesia: biologic foundations. Philadelphia:Lippincott-Raven, 1997:685718.
-
Peshori KR, Collins WF, Mendell LM. EPSP amplitude modulation at the rat Ia-alpha motoneuron synapse: effect of GABAB receptor agonists and antagonists. Neurophysiol 1998;79:1819.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Meythaler JM. Intrathecally delivered medications for spasticity and dystonia. In: Yaksh TL, ed. Spinal drug delivery. Amsterdam:Elsevier Science BV, 1999:51330.
-
Herman RM, DLuzansky SC, Ippolito R. Intrathecal baclofen suppresses central pain in patients with spinal lesions: a pilot study. Clin J Pain 1992;8:33845.[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Loubser PG, Akman NM. Effects of intrathecal baclofen on chronic spinal cord injury pain. Pain Symptom Manage 1996;12:2417.
-
Taira T, Kawamura H, Tanikawa T, et al. A new approach to control central deafferentation pain: spinal intrathecal baclofen. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1995;65:1015.[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Hogan Q. Gross anatomy of the human vertebral column. In: Yaksh TL, ed. Spinal drug delivery. Amsterdam:Elsevier Science BV, 1999:97114.
-
Yaksh TL. Spinal opiates: a review of their effect on spinal function with emphasis on pain processing. Anaesthesiol Scand 1987;31:2537.
-
Yaksh TL, Harty GJ. Pharmacology of the allodynia in rats evoked by high dose intrathecal morphine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1988;244:5017.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ebert B, Andersen S, Krogsgaard-Larsen P. Ketobemidone, methadone and pethidine are non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists in the rat cortex and spinal cord. Neurosci Lett 1995;187:1658.[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Gorman AL, Elliott KJ, Inturrisi CE. The d- and l-isomers of methadone bind to the non-competitive site on the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor in rat forebrain and spinal cord. Neurosci Lett 1997;223:58.[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Shimoyama N, Shimoyama M, Elliott KJ, Inturrisi CE. d-Methadone is antinociceptive in the rat formalin test. Pharmacol Exp Ther 283:64852.
-
Takano M, Takano Y, Yaksh TL. Release of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), substance P (SP), and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) from rat spinal cord: modulation by
2 agonists. Peptides 1993;14:3718.[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Yaksh TL, Jage J, Takano Y. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of medullar agents. C. The spinal actions of
2-adrenergic agonists as analgesics. In:Aitkenhead AR, Benad G, Brown BR, et al., eds. Baillières clinical anaesthesiology. Vol 7. No. 3. London: Baillière Tindall, 1993:597614.
-
Eisenach JC, De Kock M, Klimscha W. Alpha(2)-adrenergic agonists for regional anesthesia: a clinical review of clonidine (19841995). Anesthesiology 1996;85:65574.[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Tremblay LE, Bedard PJ. Effect of clonidine on motoneuron excitability in spinalized rats. Neuropharmacology 1986;25:416.[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Middleton JW, Siddall PJ, Walker S, et al. Intrathecal clonidine and baclofen in the management of spasticity and neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury: a case study. Archives Phys Med Rehab 1996;77:8246.
-
Denys P, Chartier-Kastler E, Azouvi P, et al. Intrathecal clonidine for refractory detrusor hyperreflexia in spinal cord injured patients: a preliminary report. J Urol 1998;160:21378.[Web of Science][Medline]
Accepted for publication August 10, 1999.
|