| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Department of Anesthesia, Veterans General Hospital-Kaohsiung, National Yang-Ming University, School of Medicine, Taiwan, Republic of China
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Yuan-Yi Chia, MD, Department of Anesthesia, Veterans General Hospital-Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Republic of China.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Implications: Although dexamethasone is effective for antiemesis, major side effects may accompany its perioperative use. To achieve the best antiemesis with the fewest side effects, dexamethasone 10 mg, 5 mg, 2.5 mg, and 1.25 mg were compared with placebo in surgical patients. We found 2.5 mg to be the minimum effective dose without discernible side effects.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Immediately before the induction of anesthesia, patients were randomly assigned to 5 groups of 30 patients to receive dexamethasone, at doses of 10 mg (D10), 5 mg (D5), 2.5 mg (D2.5), 1.25 mg (D1.25), or saline (placebo) (P), which was prepared as 2 mL of clear solution in an identical syringe. Anesthesia was induced with fentanyl 2 µg/kg and diazepam 0.15 mg/kg IV. Tracheal intubation was facilitated with lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg, thiopental 4 mg/kg, and succinylcholine 1.5 mg/kg. General anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane or halothane, 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen, and IV infusion of atracurium at a rate of 0.25 mg · kg-1 · h-1. At the end of surgery, the trachea was extubated when peripheral nerve stimulation indicated a train-of-four ratio more than 75% without the use of an anticholinesterase drug. Types of surgery included abdominal total hysterectomy, myomectomy, and radical hysterectomy. For postoperative analgesia, a patient-controlled analgesia (Abbott Pain Management Provider) pump was programmed to deliver morphine 1.5 mg IV on demand with a lockout interval of 10 min. Pain intensity was rated by the patient using the visual analog pain score (VAPS) system (010; 0, no pain; 10, most severe pain imaginable). The level of sedation was assessed by staff on the acute pain team using a 03 scale (0, fully awake; 1, asleep with response to stimulus; 2, asleep without response to stimulus; 3, comatose). Episodes of vomiting, VAPS, sedation score, time to first morphine demand, and morphine consumption were recorded at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h after operation. Vomiting was defined as forceful expulsion of liquid gastric contents. Retching and nausea were not considered vomiting for the purpose of this investigation. Rescue antiemetic administration of prochlorperazine 10 mg im was given at the patients request. Duration of hospital stay was recorded also.
Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance with a linear contrast,
2 test with trend, and the Kruskal-Wallis test as appropriate. The sample size (30 patients in each group) was calculated to detect a decrease in incidence of vomiting from 60% to 40% after treatment, with a power of 70%. Data are presented as the means ± SD. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Various doses of dexamethasone (from 8 mg orally to 1 mg/kg up to 25 mg IV) have been effective in providing postoperative antiemesis. Our previous study demonstrated dexamethasone 10 mg resulted in a significant decrease in the incidence of postoperative emesis (7). This study further demonstrated that dexamethasone 5 mg and 2.5 mg are equally effective as 10 mg, and that all of these doses resulted in significant reductions of the incidence of postoperative emesis when compared with Groups P or D 1.25 mg. Furthermore, there were no differences in the incidence of postoperative emesis among Groups D10, D5, and D2.5 and between Groups D1.25 and P. These results suggest that dexamethasone 2.5 mg represents the established minimum effective dose for the prevention of postoperative emesis after major gynecological surgery.
The fact that five patients of Group P requested rescue antiemetic as compared with none of the dexamethasone-treated groups suggests that dexamethasone can effectively reduce the extent of severity of postoperative emesis, even at a dose of 1.25 mg.
Baxendale et al. (8) reported decreased wound pain after tooth extraction after dexamethasone administration. In this study, VAPS and time to first morphine demand were similar among groups, although a consistent but insignificant decrease of morphine consumption, which was associated with the escalation of dexamethasone dosage, was observed among groups at various time intervals. The discrepancy between the results of Baxendales study and ours may be attributed to different postoperative pain intensities between tooth extraction and major gynecological surgery. With its strong antiinflammatory effect, dexamethasone should theoretically be beneficial for acute surgical pain, whereas for those with mild pain, such as after tooth extraction, the pain can be reduced with dexamethasone administration to an extent that most patients can perceive a significant change in pain intensity. For those with the worst pain, such as after major surgery, the pain can only be slightly lessened with dexamethasone administration because its analgesic effect tends to be minimal and unsatisfactory.
The lack of difference in duration of hospital stay among groups implies that there was no additional wound infection or delayed healing accompanying dexamethasone usage. However, more detailed investigation with a longer follow-up would be necessary to prove this.
In conclusion, in this study, dexamethasone 2.5 mg was the minimum effective dose for preventing postoperative emesis in patients undergoing general anesthesia for major gynecological surgery. Yet, a dose of 1.25 mg can still effectively reduce the extent of severity of the emesis. The doses of 10 mg and 5 mg did not offer any therapeutic advantage over 2.5 mg. Moreover, we found no influence of preoperative administration of dexamethasone on postoperative pain in major gynecological surgery.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. J. Kardash, F. Sarrazin, M. J. Tessler, and A. M. Velly Single-Dose Dexamethasone Reduces Dynamic Pain After Total Hip Arthroplasty Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2008; 106(4): 1253 - 1257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Kim, C. J. Cote, C. Cristoloveanu, A. G. Roth, P. Vornov, M. A. Jennings, J. P. Maddalozzo, and C. Sullivan There Is No Dose-Escalation Response to Dexamethasone (0.0625-1.0 mg/kg) in Pediatric Tonsillectomy or Adenotonsillectomy Patients for Preventing Vomiting, Reducing Pain, Shortening Time to First Liquid Intake, or the Incidence of Voice Change Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2007; 104(5): 1052 - 1058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Paech, M. W.M. Rucklidge, J. Lain, P. H. Dodd, E.-J. Bennett, and D. A. Doherty Ondansetron and Dexamethasone Dose Combinations for Prophylaxis Against Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2007; 104(4): 808 - 814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M Wilhelm, M. L Dehoorne-Smith, and P. B Kale-Pradhan Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Ann. Pharmacother., January 1, 2007; 41(1): 68 - 78. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Salerno and R. Hermann Efficacy and Safety of Steroid Use for Postoperative Pain Relief. Update and Review of the Medical Literature J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2006; 88(6): 1361 - 1372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Golembiewski, E. Chernin, and T. Chopra Prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., June 15, 2005; 62(12): 1247 - 1260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Madan, A. Bhatia, S. Chakithandy, R. Subramaniam, G. Rammohan, S. Deshpande, M. Singh, and H. L. Kaul Prophylactic Dexamethasone for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Pediatric Strabismus Surgery: A Dose Ranging and Safety Evaluation Study Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2005; 100(6): 1622 - 1626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Apfel, K. Korttila, M. Abdalla, H. Kerger, A. Turan, I. Vedder, C. Zernak, K. Danner, R. Jokela, S. J. Pocock, et al. A Factorial Trial of Six Interventions for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting N. Engl. J. Med., June 10, 2004; 350(24): 2441 - 2451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Gan, T. Meyer, C. C. Apfel, F. Chung, P. J. Davis, S. Eubanks, A. Kovac, B. K. Philip, D. I. Sessler, J. Temo, et al. Consensus Guidelines for Managing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2003; 97(1): 62 - 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Thomas and N. Jones Prospective randomized, double-blind comparative study of dexamethasone, ondansetron, and ondansetron plus dexamethasone as prophylactic antiemetic therapy in patients undergoing day-case gynaecological surgery Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2001; 87(4): 588 - 592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Aouad, S. S. Siddik, L. B. Rizk, G. M. Zaytoun, and A. S. Baraka, MD The Effect of Dexamethasone on Postoperative Vomiting After Tonsillectomy Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2001; 92(3): 636 - 640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.-H. Tan, K. Liu, C.-H. Peng, L.-C. Yang, C.-R. Lin, and C.-Y. Lu The Effect of Dexamethasone on Postoperative Pain and Emesis After Intrathecal Neostigmine Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2001; 92(1): 228 - 232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-J. Wang, S.-T. Ho, S.-C. Lee, Y.-C. Liu, and C.-M. Ho The Use of Dexamethasone for Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Females Undergoing Thyroidectomy: A Dose-Ranging Study Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2000; 91(6): 1404 - 1407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-J. Wang, S.-T. Ho, J.-I. Tzeng, and C.-S. Tang The Effect of Timing of Dexamethasone Administration on Its Efficacy as a Prophylactic Antiemetic for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2000; 91(1): 136 - 139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|