JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chaney, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kawamata, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chaney, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kawamata, M.
Anesth Analg 1999;89:1333
© 1999 International Anesthesia Research Society


LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Methylprednisolone and the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome

Mark A. Chaney, MD, and Mihail P. Nikolov, MD

Department of Anesthesiology Loyola University Medical Center , Maywood, Illinois 60153

We read with great interest the recent article by Sumida et al. (1) describing their work with methylprednisolone and the systemic inflammatory response syndrome. In their clinical model of intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion-induced systemic inflammatory response syndrome, they found that pretreatment with IV methylprednisolone (50 mg/kg, total) attenuated the increase in circulating tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} and prevented pulmonary dysfunction as assessed by lung injury scores (which incorporated a chest radiograph score, a hypoxemia score, and a positive end-expiratory pressure score) (1). They also found that the systemic vascular resistance was significantly decreased, and the cardiac index was significantly increased in the methylprednisolone-pretreated group, and they postulate that the drug may attenuate tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}-induced vasoconstriction or directly dilate resistance vessels (1).

We have recently studied the pulmonary and hemodynamic effects of methylprednisolone in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (which initiates the systemic inflammatory response syndrome) (2,3). Like Sumida et al., we found that pretreatment with IV methylprednisolone (60 mg/kg, total) significantly decreased systemic vascular resistance and significantly increased cardiac index in the immediate postoperative period (2,3). However, unlike Sumida et al., in our clinical model of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome, methylprednisolone induced pulmonary dysfunction in the immediate postoperative period (significantly larger increases in alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient and significantly prolonged extubation time) (2,3). We did not assess circulating tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} levels in our study; yet we found that methylprednisolone was unable to attenuate complement activation associated with cardiopulmonary bypass (2,3).

It is apparent that methylprednisolone may benefit certain patients who experience the systemic inflammatory response syndrome. However, further study is required before specific indications are clear.

References

  1. Sumida M, Inaba H, Isawa E, et al. Prevention by methylprednisolone of increased circulating tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} levels and lung injury associated with systemic inflammatory response syndrome due to intraperitoneal hyperthermia. Anesth Analg 1999;88:771–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Chaney MA, Nikolov MP, Blakeman B, et al. Pulmonary effects of methylprednisolone in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and early tracheal extubation. Anesth Analg 1998;87:27–33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Chaney MA, Nikolov MP, Blakeman BP, et al. Hemodynamic effects of methylprednisolone in patients undergoing cardiac operation and early extubation. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:1006–11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

 

Response

Megumi Sumida, MD, and Miwako Kawamata, MD

Department of Anesthesiology Tokyo Women’s Medical University Daini Hospital Tokyo 116, Japan

We appreciate Dr. Chaney’s interest in our article (1) and the opportunity to provide more details about our article. We reported that methylprednisolone (MPS) prevented lung injury in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) induced by intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion (IPHP). In contrast, Chaney et al. (2) reported that MPS worsened pulmonary function in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the immediate postoperative period. Although it is important to measure alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient, dynamic pulmonary compliance, static lung compliance, shunt, and dead space, these variables were not measured in our study. Instead, we determined the lung injury score postoperatively, including the chest radiograph score, hypoxemia score (PaO2/PAO2), and positive end-expiratory pressure score, as recommended by Marks et al. (3). Using this score, our results confirmed that pretreatment with MPS prevented lung injury. The discrepancy between the two studies might be caused by the following reasons.

Serum levels of tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} were increased in patients with gastric cancer undergoing IPHP without pretreatment of MPS in our study. Denizot et al. (4) reported that no variation of tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} levels were found in patients undergoing CABG in pre- and postoperative periods. These findings strongly suggest that differences in the severity of SIRS might contribute to the difference in MPS response between IPHP and CABG. In fact, all our patients with gastrointestinal cancer, in whom IPHP was performed, showed severe lung injury caused by SIRS compared with those undergoing CABG studied by Chaney et al. (2). In their study, 58 of 60 (97%) patients were tracheally extubated within 24 h of arrival in the intensive care unit, compared with only 2 of 17 (12%) patients in our study within the same period. Gott et al. (5) indicated that "ventilatory support for more than 48 h" is associated with high pulmonary morbidity after cardiopulmonary bypass. The time of extubation is determined clinically, based on several factors, such as lung function, level of consciousness, and cardiac function. In our study, intubation was prolonged in our MPS-treated and untreated patients compared with the other study (2).

Measurements of lung function were performed at different times in the two studies. We examined lung injury scores between 1 and 6 postoperative days, whereas Chaney et al. (2) measured alveolar-arterial gradient, dynamic pulmonary compliance, static lung compliance, shunt, and dead space at 10 min after intubation to 60 min after arrival in the intensive care unit. We did not analyze the lung injury score during operation or at the early postoperative period.

The dose of MPS used in the two studies was somewhat different. We used a dose of 50 mg/kg MPS compared with 60 mg/kg in the other study (2). This difference, though small, might produce a different response. The correct dose of MPS to prevent lung injury could not be determined at the present stage.

Further evidence for lung injury in our patients is demonstrated in preliminary studies showing recruitment of leukocytes into the lung. However, the discrepancy in the response to MPS between patients undergoing CABG (3) and those with IPHP (1) must not be ignored, and further work is needed.

References

  1. Sumida M, Inaba H, Isawa E, et al. Prevention by methylprednisolone of increased circulating tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} levels and lung injury associated with systemic inflammatory response syndrome due to intraperitoneal hyperthermia. Anesth Analg 1999;88:771–6.
  2. Chaney MA, Nikolov MP, Blakeman B, et al. Pulmonary effects of methylprednisolone in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and early tracheal extubation. Anesth Analg 1998;87:27–33.
  3. Marks JD, Marks CB, Luce JM, et al. Plasma tumor necrosis factor in patients with septic shock. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990;141:94–7.[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Denizot Y, Feiss P, Nathan N. Are lipid mediators implicated in the production of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines during cardiopulmonary bypass graft with extracorporeal circulation? Cytokine 1999;11:301–4.[Medline]
  5. Gott JP, Cooper WA, Schmidt FE Jr, et al. Modifying risk for extracorporeal circulation: trial of four antiinflammatory strategies. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:747–54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chaney, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kawamata, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chaney, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kawamata, M.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press