Anesth Analg 2000;90:85
© 2000 International Anesthesia Research Society
CRITICAL CARE AND TRAUMA
Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Has Little Effect on Carbon Dioxide Elimination After Cardiac Surgery
Roger P. R. Smith, MB, ChB, FRCA, and
Roger Fletcher, MD, FRCA
Directorate of Anaesthetics, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Central Manchester Hospitals Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Roger Fletcher, Directorate of Anaesthetics, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Central Manchester Hospitals Trust, Oxford Rd., Manchester M13 9WL, United Kindgom.
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
We investigated the effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on carbon dioxide (CO2) elimination in a cross-over study of 14 patients whose lungs were ventilated after cardiac surgery. They initially received either 7.5 cm H2O PEEP or zero end-expiratory pressure and were then changed over to the other mode. We measured CO2 minute elimination (
CO2) and "efficiency," a quantification of the shape of CO2 single-breath test (SBT-CO2), the plot of expired CO2 against expired volume.
CO2 and efficiency (and therefore the shape of SBT-CO2) were not significantly affected by PEEP. These results agree with findings in patients with acute lung injury, but are in contrast with those in an open-chest dog model, in which 7.5 cm H2O PEEP caused a 19% decrease in
CO2 and significant changes in SBT-CO2.
Implications: During artificial ventilation, applying a positive pressure in expiration expands the lung and improves the uptake of oxygen, but there is a theoretical risk of reduced carbon dioxide elimination. We applied positive end-expiratory pressure to patients immediately after heart surgery and found that it has no effect on carbon dioxide elimination.
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) improves oxygenation in many situations: it recruits previously unventilated alveoli, increases end-expiratory lung volume, and reduces right-to-left intrapulmonary shunting. However, by increasing mean alveolar pressure, it may have negative effects on carbon dioxide (CO2) elimination. In patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress, 15 cm H2O PEEP had little effect on CO2 elimination (1). In contrast, in anesthetized, ventilated, open-chest dogs, Breen et al. (2) found that 7.5 cm H2O PEEP reduced minute CO2 elimination (
CO2) by 19%. The airway dead space increased by 24% and the physiological dead space by 12%.
Further, in dogs (2), but not in humans (1), there was a marked change in the shape of the plot of expired PCO2 against expired volume, the CO2 single-breath test (SBT-CO2). The slope of Phase III of SBT-CO2 (3), the "alveolar plateau," was increased, implying an increased spread of ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) ratios. Also, the transition between Phase II and Phase III became less distinct. [Phase II is the upstroke in expired PCO2 between Phases I and III, representing the mixing of airway and alveolar gas, and the progressive recruitment of transit times (4).] A sloping Phase III implies a difference between PETCO2 and mean alveolar PCO2. The slope is positively correlated to the arterial-end tidal PCO2 difference and the alveolar dead space fraction (5).
One of us (RF) had recorded SBT-CO2 in many patients with PEEP, but had never witnessed the quantitative and qualitative changes in SBT-CO2 demonstrated by Breen et al. (2) in dogs. We therefore performed a cross-over trial to investigate the effects of PEEP in humans. We made our measurements immediately after cardiac surgerya situation in which PEEP is beneficial.
 |
Methods
|
|---|
After local ethics committee approval, 15 patients (11 male) undergoing cardiac surgery gave informed consent to the study. None were current smokers. Their median age was 64 yr (range 5076), height 170 cm (154182), and weight 76 kg (62100). They were premedicated with lorazepam 23.5 mg. Anesthesia was induced with fentanyl 23 mg. Pancuronium 811 mg was given to facilitate intubation, and their lungs were ventilated with 0.5%1.0% enflurane in an air:oxygen mixture (FIO2) 0.5. Cardiopulmonary bypass was conducted with a 2l crystalloid prime. Donor blood was given as necessary to achieve a postbypass hemoglobin of 8.59.5 g/dL.
After the chest drains had been inserted and the sternum wired, the patients lungs were ventilated with a Servo 900C ventilator (Siemens-Elema, Solna, Sweden) set to volume control. The rate was fixed at 15 breaths/min, inspiratory:expiratory ratio 1:2, with no end-expiratory pause. The enflurane in air/oxygen continued throughout (FIO2 0.5). Minute volume was adjusted to produce a PETCO2 of approximately 4.0 kPa. The breathing circuit and the endotracheal tube cuff had been previously tested for leaks. Patients were sequentially assigned to initially receive either 7.5 cm H2O PEEP or zero positive end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP).
Expired PCO2 was measured by a Siemens-Elema 930 capnograph (Solna, Sweden) (6), an in-line device, which obtains power, expiratory flow, and timing signals from the Servo 900C ventilator. The flow signal from the ventilator is used to calculate expired CO2 volume. The 930 can be connected to a computer to obtain SBT-CO2 values (7,8). In addition to displaying PETCO2 and
CO2, it shows the volume of Phase I of SBT-CO2 (the non-CO2 containing part of the tidal volume) and the volume of the combined Phases II and III, i.e., the CO2-containing part of the tidal volume. The particular device we used was fitted with special components that give a quicker response time than the commercially available versions (9). The delay in the CO2 signal is 12 ms, while that of the expiratory flow signal is 4 ms (9). In practice, these delays are of little significance, and compared with laboratory analysis of expired gas CO2, there is no systematic error at adult tidal volumes (911). The CO2 signal is linear in air/oxygen mixtures, as is the expired volume signal. The device does not compensate for compressed volume in the tubings. About 62%68% of the compressed gas leaves the system before CO2 reaches the transducer (10), and therefore, with knowledge of the tubing compliance and end-expiratory airway pressure, it is possible to estimate the effect of the remaining 33%38% of compressed gas on the calculation of
CO2.
The shape of SBT-CO2 was quantified as "efficiency" (12), i.e., the volume of CO2 in the breath, divided by the theoretical maximal volume in a breath of square wave form, expressed as a percentage. This square wave form is defined by Phase II plus Phase III volume (i.e., the CO2 containing part of the tidal volume) and PETCO2 (Fig. 1). Results were analyzed by using Students paired t-test; P values of < 0.05 were regarded as significant.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Efficiency is defined by the area under the curve, area X, divided by the theoretical maximal area under the curve, area ABCDA, expressed as a percentage. Efficiency in anesthetized, ventilated patients normally varies between 72% and 88%. Lower values are found in emphysema and asthma. Reproduced from Fletcher et al. (6) with permission from the British Journal of Anesthesia.
|
|
After sternal wiring was complete and when PETCO2 and
CO2 were constant, these variables were noted from the capnograph display over 510 breaths. Also noted were Phase I volume and the combined volume of Phases II and III. The ventilator was then switched to the other mode, and new readings were taken when PETCO2 and
CO2 had once again stabilized, after 25 min.
 |
Results
|
|---|
Desaturation during ZEEP ventilation resulted in our abandoning measurement in one patient. In the remaining 14 patients, applying 7.5 cm H2O PEEP decreased mean tidal volume by 4 mL. Mean
CO2 decreased by 4 mL CO2/min, i.e., 2% (not significant), with no change in PETCO2. Phase I volume, which is approximately half of the airway dead space (10), increased by 5 mL. The compliance of the tubings was 1.5 mL/cm H2O, and therefore, it can be estimated that, at the airway pressures obtained, most of the 5 mL increase in Phase I volume during PEEP ventilation would be caused by compressed volume. There was no change in efficiency, and therefore, the shape of SBT-CO2 cannot have changed significantly. Thus, there can have been no important change in the volume of Phase II or the slope of Phase III. There was no difference in findings between those who began with PEEP and those who began with ZEEP.
Figure 2 was obtained from an on-line computer program, which became available after data from the 14 patients had been collected. It shows SBT-CO2 tracings from a patient undergoing PEEP and ZEEP ventilation after cardiac surgery. The computer program takes signals from the ventilator and capnograph and compensates for compressed volume (7,8). The figure shows that Phase I volumes and Phase III slopes are similar, but there is an increase of approximately 10 mL in airway dead space with PEEP. The tidal volumes of CO2 were 11.5 mL (ZEEP) and 11.0 mL (PEEP).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. SBT-CO2 tracings obtained from a patient after cardiac surgery during zero positive end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) and 7.5 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ventilation. The data are compensated for compressed volume. The main difference between the two tracings is an increase in airway dead space of approximately 10 mL and a reduction in tidal CO2 elimination of approximately 4% effected by PEEP. There is no obvious difference in Phase III slope or Phase I volume.
|
|
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
In a setting in which it is clinically beneficial, we have shown that PEEP causes little qualitative or quantitative change in CO2 elimination. A similar lack of effect of PEEP on the shape of SBT-CO2 was reported in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress (1). These results contrast sharply with those obtained in open-chest dogs (2); PEEP reduced
CO2 by 19%, and produced a considerable change in the shape of SBT-CO2, implying a greater spread of V/Q ratios.
PEEP reopens collapsed alveoli, increasing CO2 clearance from such areas. It also dilates the conducting airways and may cause over-ventilation of some alveoli. The increased alveolar pressure may also distribute the pulmonary blood flow away from such areas, which should reduce CO2 clearance. Presumably, in our cardiac surgery patients, any negative effects of PEEP on already ventilated alveoli were largely compensated for by the increase in CO2 elimination from previously low and zero V/Q compartments.
The data in Table 1 were not compensated for airway pressure. With our system, 62%68% of compressed gas volume passes through the ventilator flowmeter before any CO2 arrives at the CO2 transducer (10). We argued above that most of the 5-mL increase in Phase I volume during PEEP ventilation would be caused by compressed volume. The SBT-CO2 shown in Figure 2, in which the data are compensated for airway pressure, supports this; there is little difference in Phase I volume between the two modes. Less than one quarter of the compressed volume passes through the flowmeter during Phase III (10); thus, the error in the measurement of
CO2 caused by PEEP is likely to be negligible. The small reduction in tidal volume with PEEP appears to be a feature of the Servo ventilator, as it occurs when ventilating a test lung.
We did not sample blood gases and, therefore, could not measure alveolar dead space or the arterial-end tidal PCO2 difference. However, by monitoring
CO2 and PETCO2 continuously, we were able to demonstrate steady state at both measurements. Indeed, a striking finding of the measurement protocol was the lack of change in
CO2 on applying and removing PEEP; therefore, only a short time (two to five minutes) was needed to re-establish steady state after changing mode.
Although our protocol did not include plotting expired CO2 against expired volume, we can be reasonably sure that PEEP did not cause any significant change in SBT-CO2. Efficiency did not change, and therefore, Phase III slope could not have changed significantly, as Figure 2 confirms. [Efficiency in anesthetized patients varies between 72% and 88% (5), the greater values being associated with large tidal volumes in healthy patients. Values below 70% are seen in obstructive airway disease.] In dogs (2), PEEP affected the relationship between PETCO2 and mean alveolar PCO2 by increasing Phase III slope. Our data suggest that, in cardiac surgery patients, the relationship is not significantly changed. Others have failed to show a change in Phase III slope when PEEP was applied to patients with lung injury (1).
The relationship between Phase III slope and commonly used indices of gas exchange have been explored in detail (5). The slope is caused by sequential emptying of lung regions with different V/Q ratios. The first alveoli to empty have the highest V/Q ratios and, therefore, the lowest PCO2; those emptying last have the lowest V/Q ratios and the highest PCO2 (13). In addition, stratified inhomogeneity, caused by incomplete gas mixing within respiratory units (4), may play a part. Although both forms of mismatching could theoretically be worsened by PEEP, this was not demonstrated in our cardiac surgery patients. We chose to investigate these subjects because PEEP is usually beneficial in restoring the loss of lung volume effected by anesthesia and cardiac surgery. The present results and those of Blanch et al. (1) in patients with acute lung injury show no comparable changes to those in dogs (2). In clinical situations in which PEEP is commonly applied, PEEP appears to have little effect on CO2 elimination.
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Blanch LI, Lucangelo U, Lopez-Aguilar J, et al. Volumetric capnography in patients with acute lung injury: effects of positive end-expiratory pressure. Eur Respir J 1999;13:104854.[Abstract]
-
Breen PH, Mazumdar BD, Skinner SC. Comparison of end-tidal PCO2 and average alveolar expired PCO2 during positive end-expiratory pressure. Anesth Analg 1996;82:36873.[Abstract]
-
Fowler WS. Lung function studies. V. Respiratory dead space in old age and in pulmonary emphysema. J Clin Invest 1950;29:143944.
-
Horsfield K, Cumming G. Functional consequences of airway morphology. J Appl Physiol 1968;24:38490.[Free Full Text]
-
Fletcher R, Jonson B. Deadspace and the single breath test for carbon dioxide during anaesthesia and artificial ventilation. Br J Anaesth 1984;56:10919.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Olsson SG, Fletcher R, Jonson B, et al. Clinical studies of gas exchange during ventilatory support: a method using the Siemens-Elema CO2 analyzer. Br J Anaesth 1980;52:4918.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Fletcher R, Malmqvist G, Jansson L, Jonson B. On-line measurement of deadspace during cardiac surgery. Anaesthesiol Scand 1986;30:2959.
-
Fletcher R. On-line expiratory CO2 monitoring. Clin Comput 1986; 3: 15563.
-
Fletcher R. The single breath test for carbon dioxide. Lund, Sweden:Fletcher, 1980.
-
Fletcher R, Werner O, Nordstrom L, Jonson B. Sources of error and their correction in the measurement of carbon dioxide elimination using the Siemens-Elema CO2 Analyzer. Br J Anaesth 1983;55:17785.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Fletcher R, Niklason L, Drefeldt B. Gas exchange during controlled ventilation in children with normal and abnormal pulmonary circulation. Anesth Analg 1986;65:64552.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Fletcher R, Jonson B, Cumming G, Brew J. The concept of deadspace with special reference to the single breath test for carbon dioxide. Br J Anaesth 1981;53:7788.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
West JB, Fowler KT, Hugh-Jones P, ODonnell TV. The measurement of the inequality of ventilation and of perfusion in the lung by the analysis of single expirates. Clin Sci 1957;16:54964.
Accepted for publication September 27, 1999.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. Lucangelo, F. Bernabe, S. Vatua, G. Degrassi, A. Villagra, R. Fernandez, P. V. Romero, P. Saura, M. Borelli, and L. Blanch
Prognostic Value of Different Dead Space Indices in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Acute Lung Injury and ARDS
Chest,
January 1, 2008;
133(1):
62 - 71.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|