| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Starship Childrens Hospital Auckland, New Zealand
The report by Leech et al. (1) describes the unfortunate consequences of central venous catheter placement within the pericardial reflection, and the authors are to be congratulated on their successful management. We have struggled with the correct length for placement of central venous lines via the internal jugular route and have audited all central lines, taking the right bronchial origin as the ideal tip position at radiography (2,3). Regression lines for catheter length with respect to age, weight, and height were constructed. The best correlate for length was weight, with a regression line of 0.13 x weight (kg) + 4.9 cm and correlation coefficient of 0.90. For a 7-kg infant, the predicted length is 5.8 cm. For practical purposes, 5-cm lines may be used for 5- to 15-kg infants, 8 cm lines for children of 15- to 40-kg and 13 cm lines for those over 40 kg. Formulas based on patient height also provide reasonable predictions for insertion length: from Czepizak et al. (4), (Ht in cm/10) -1. Large multilumen catheters increase the risk of vessel wall perforation (5) and may explain the rapid onset in this patient. Our hope is that length selection based on this formula will reduce repeat radiography and catheter-related morbidity.
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. M. Browne, D. J. Birnbach, S. Y. Dolinski, and J. C. Gerancher Unmasked Mischief Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2001; 92(1): 279 - 281. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Whiteside Meningitis After Spinal Anaesthesia Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2000; 91(3): 763 - 764. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|