| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We studied the effect of propofol (5.6560 µmol/L; 1100 µg/mL) on the mechanisms involved in Ca2+ mobilization elicited by angiotensin II (AngII) in Wistar Kyoto (WKY) and spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) rats. We studied the variations in intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) concentrations in cultured aortic vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) isolated from 6-wk-old WKY and SHR rats loaded with the Ca2+-sensitive fluorescent dye, Fura-2, using fluorescent imaging microscopy. In the absence of external Ca2+, AngII (1 µmol/L) induced a transient [Ca2+]i mobilization from internal stores that was larger in SHR than in WKY rats. Ca2+ influx was assessed after external Ca2+ (1 mmol/L) reintroduction. Propofol (1100 µg/mL) added 5 min before the experiments did not alter AngII-induced Ca2+ release from internal stores in either strain. By contrast, Ca2+ influx elicited by AngII was significantly decreased by propofol. This effect occurred at a smaller concentration of propofol in the SHR than in the WKY rats. When Ca2+ stores were depleted by exposure of cells to thapsigargin, an inhibitor of the sarcoendoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase, reintroduction of Ca2+ to the medium induced a capacitative Ca2+ influx of similar magnitude than that elicited by AngII. This influx was also significantly decreased by propofol at 100 µg/mL ( WKY: 27 ± 3% of control values, n = 107; SHR: 16 ± 3%, n = 47; P < 0.001). In conclusion, propofol decreased AngII-induced Ca2+ influx through voltage-independent channels, without altering Ca2+ release from internal stores in aortic VSMCs. The hypertensive rats were found to be more sensitive to the effect of propofol than the normotensive rats. This suggests that the response of VSMCs to AngII may be altered by propofol. Implications: In rat aortic vascular smooth muscle cells, propofol reduced angiotensin II-elicited Ca2+ entry through capacitative Ca2+ channels without altering Ca2+ release from intracellular stores. Spontaneously hypertensive rats were more sensitive to these effects of propofol than normotensive rats. The response of vascular smooth muscle cells to angiotensin II may be altered by propofol.
Propofol (2,6-diisopropylphenol) causes a decrease in arterial blood pressure that is partly due to a decrease in systemic vascular resistance (1,2). A direct relaxant action of propofol on vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) may be one of the mechanisms of propofol-induced vasodilation (35). Recently, several studies have attempted to identify the cellular mechanisms implicated in the action of propofol and, in particular, how the effects of vasoactive substances are modulated. In this regard, transduction of signal through intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) mobilization is particularly important because VSMC tension is closely related to Ca2+ variations elicited by vasoactive agents (69). Imura et al. (10) suggested that propofol decreased norephinephrine-induced [Ca2+]i release from storage sites in VSMCs from mesenteric arteries. In cultured A10 VSMCs, derived from embryonic rat aorta, propofol moderately decreased inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (1,4,5-IP3) production induced by endothelin-1 or arginine vasopressin, but not by sodium fluoride, an activator of guanosine triphosphate-binding proteins (11,12). Furthermore, propofol was reported to inhibit Ca2+ influx through L-type channels elicited by either endothelin-1 (11,12) or norepinephrine (10). However, little is known about the effects of propofol on angiotensin II (AngII). This peptide is a potent vasoconstrictor that is important in the short-term control of blood pressure, particularly in the hypovolemic state that may be encountered in the perioperative period. The hemodynamic effects of AngII are mediated through binding to angiotensin subtype 1 (AT1) receptors, leading to Ca2+ release from internal stores and to Ca2+ influx from extracellular spaces (79). Structural and functional abnormalities of the arterial wall have been reported in some experimental models of genetic hypertension and have been associated with an increase in Ca2+ mobilization in VSMCs in response to several agonists, especially AngII (1319). These abnormalities may be linked to the lability of blood pressure observed during general anesthesia in individuals with preexisting hypertension (20). The present study was undertaken to examine the effect of propofol on [Ca2+]i mobilization induced by AngII in VSMCs of spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) rats and a normotensive strain.
Cell Culture The study was approved by our institutional animal investigation committee and was conducted after recommendations established by the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Cultured VSMCs from thoracic aorta of 6-wk-old male SHRs with a mean arterial pressure (± SEM) of 136 ± 5 mm Hg (n = 25) and Wistar Kyoto (WKY) rats (98 ± 4 mm Hg, n = 30) were obtained by enzymatic digestion as previously described (21). In brief, aortas were incubated for 10 min in a dissecting solution containing Dulbeccos modified Eagles medium (DMEM; Eurobio, Les Ulis, France), supplemented with glutamine (2 mmol/L), 0.1% bovine serum albumin, penicillin (100 units/mL), streptomycin (100 µg/mL), and collagenase (295 units/mL). The adventitia was stripped off mechanically, and the endothelial layer was gently scraped off. The medial layer of the aorta was then incubated for 20 min, at 37°C in dissecting solution in which CaCl2 content has been reduced to 0.8 mmol/L, and to which elastase (90 units/mL) and pronase (0.33 mg/mL) had been added. Cells were then detached by gently pipetting the tissue through a large-hole Pasteur pipette. The undigested tissue was incubated in fresh dissecting medium for another 20 min, and the procedure was then repeated twice. At the end of the digestion procedure, CaCl2 was added progressively by steps of 0.25 mmol/L to reach a final concentration of 1.6 mmol/L. To obtain secondary cultures, isolated cells were seeded at 1.5 to 2 x 105 cells/mL into 25 cm2 flasks in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Eurobio), 2 mmol/L of L-glutamine, 25 mmol/L of N-(2-hydroxyethyl) piperazine-N'-(2-ethanesulfonic) acid (HEPES), pH 7.4, 100 units/mL of penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin, and incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator. The medium was changed every 48 h. At confluence, secondary cultures were obtained by serial passage after the cells were harvested with 0.5 g/L trypsin and 0.2 g/L EDTA (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and reseeded in fresh DMEM containing 10% fetal calf serum.
Cell Ca2+ Measurements Cell Ca2+ variations induced by AngII were studied in single cells. As previously described, AngII induced a receptor desensitization that precluded repetitive stimulation of the same cell by AngII (25). Because propofol is insoluble in water, we used the available form of propofol using a soya bean emulsion as solvent (Zeneca Pharma, Cergy, France). Propofol, in concentrations of 1100 µg/mL (5.6560 µmol/L), was added to the perfusion medium 5 min before the experiment and maintained throughout each study. We also tested the solvent itself (10 g/L soya bean oil, 22 g/L glycerol, and 12 g/L egg phosphatide; Intralipide®, Pharmacia & Upjohn SA, Saint Quentin-en-Yvelines, France) at a concentration of 10 µL/mL, corresponding to the highest concentration of propofol studied.
Fluids and Drugs
Statistical Analysis
Effect of AngII on Cell Ca2+ AngII addition caused a transient increase in [Ca2+]i, characterized by the amplitude and area under the Ca2+ variation over time (total Ca2+ released) (Fig. 1A). AngII-induced Ca2+ release from internal stores was assessed in Ca2+-free Na+-HEPES medium (Fig. 1B). The maximum effect was obtained at concentrations above 0.5 µmol/L (Fig. 2) (15,18). Therefore, the effect of AngII was assessed at 1 µmol/L in both strains. AT1 antagonists CGP-48 933 (100 nM) and CI-996 (100 nM) inhibited the response to AngII in both strains (>95% inhibition, P < 0.0001 for each).
The amplitude of Ca2+ mobilization induced by AngII was higher in the SHR than in WKY, as previously described (Table 1) (15). AngII-induced Ca2+ influx was estimated from the rate of [Ca2+]i increase after reintroduction of external Ca2+ (Fig. 1B). In preliminary experiments, [Ca2+]i changes occurring in nonstimulated cells as a consequence of Ca2+ chelation and reintroduction were found to be very low, with a mean of 0.002 ratio unit/min. AngII-induced Ca2+ influx was significantly higher in the SHR than in the WKY rat (Table 1). Ca2+ influx elicited by AngII was not significantly altered by nifedipine (5 µmol/L) in either strain (WKY: 98% ± 8% of control values, n = 73; SHR: 93% ± 14% of control values, n = 43, P: not significant [NS] for each). To assess the role of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger in AngII-induced Ca2+ influx, experiments were performed in the absence of external Na+, which had been replaced by NMG. Ca2+ influx was similar in Na+-HEPES and NMG-HEPES solution in both WKY rats (Na+-HEPES: 0.396 ± 0.024 ratio unit/min; NMG-HEPES: 0.402 ± 0.042, n = 109, P: NS) and SHR rats (Na+-HEPES: 0.481 ± 0.048 ratio unit/min; NMG-HEPES: 0.410 ± 0.040, n = 103, P: NS). This suggests that the participation of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger in Ca2+ influx is negligible under the conditions of this study.
Effect of Propofol on Ca2+ Handling Propofol at a concentration up to 100 µg/mL did not alter the resting Ca2+ in either WKY rats (control: 0.40 ± 0.01 ratio units; propofol [100 µg/mL]: 0.37 ± 0.01, n = 102, P: NS) and SHR rats (control: 0.42 ± 0.01 ratio units; propofol [100 µg/mL]: 0.43 ± 0.02, n = 85, P: NS). Propofol did not alter AngII-induced Ca2+ release from internal stores (Fig. 3), whereas a significant decrease in Ca2+ influx elicited by AngII was observed in both WKY and SHR rats (Fig. 4). Propofol exerted its effect at a concentration of 30 µg/mL (168.5 µmol/L) in the WKY rats and at 3 µg/mL (16.9 µmol/L) in the SHR rats. Solvent alone at a dilution of 10 µL/mL did not significantly modify either resting Ca2+, or AngII-induced Ca2+ release from internal stores, or Ca2+ influx in either strain (Table 2; and Figs. 3 and 4).
Effect of Thapsigargin on Cell Ca2+ Addition of thapsigargin (3 µmol/L) in the absence of external Ca2+ induced a transient [Ca2+]i increase in both strains, at a slower rate than that observed with AngII. Reintroduction of Ca2+ (1 mmol/L) into the medium induced a Ca2+ influx of similar magnitude to that observed after stimulation with 1 µmol/L AngII. Incubation of VSMCs with thapsigargin for 5 min abolished the response to subsequent infusion of AngII in the two strains (results not shown), as previously reported (15). Furthermore, thapsigargin completely depleted [Ca2+]i stores, because ionomycin addition did not elicit any increase in cell Ca2+ (WKY: 98 ± 1% of inhibition, n = 28; SHR: 98 ± 2% of inhibition, n = 25, P < 0.001 for each). Propofol significantly decreased thapsigargin-induced Ca2+ influx in both strains (Table 2).
The present study demonstrates that propofol can alter the response of VSMCs to AngII. Propofol was found to reduce Ca2+ influx through voltage-independent Ca2+ channels elicited by AngII, but to be without effect on AngII-induced Ca2+ mobilization from internal stores in VSMCs from both SHR and WKY rats. In aortic VSMCs, binding of AngII to AT1 receptors causes a transient increase in [Ca2+]i due to the release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores, and a Ca2+ influx across the membrane via Ca2+ channels (79,26). AngII activates phospholipase C that hydrolyzes phophatidylinositol 4,5-biphosphate, thereby releasing 1,4,5-IP3 to the cytosol. The latter moiety binds to its receptor releasing Ca2+ from storage pools. Our results show that the pathway from AT1 binding to Ca2+ mobilization is not altered by propofol. Previous studies have assessed the effect of propofol on VSMC tension (4,10,27). Propofol reduces the phasic increase in force in rabbit mesenteric arteries caused by norepinephrine (10). This was attributed to a decrease in Ca2+ release from internal stores. Heterogeneities in Ca2+ transport mechanisms elicited by G protein-coupled receptors between species and between vascular beds may account for this difference. The depletion of Ca2+ from intracellular stores through agonist-induced release is replenished by Ca2+ influx from the extracellular space (7,26). The major finding of this study is that propofol inhibits this influx in both WKY and SHR rats. In aortic VSMCs, the major Ca2+ entry mechanism induced by AngII is voltage-independent [this study and (8,28)]. This is in contrast to other vascular beds, such as the mesenteric bed, where voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels have been reported (29). Propofol has been reported to act as a voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel blocker in several experimental models (1012). Previous studies in mesenteric VSMCs and A10 lines have shown that the voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels characteristic of these vascular bedsand elicited by norepinephrine, endothelin-1, or arginine vasopressinare inhibited by propofol (1012,30). In VSMCs, capacitative Ca2+ influx is known to be elicited by either 1,4,5-IP3 or an increase in cell Ca2+. Studies using agents such as thapsigargin that inhibit the Ca2+-ATPase have demonstrated that Ca2+ store depletion provides a full and sufficient signal for the activation of capacitative Ca2+ entry (26,31,32). Our results show that propofol also inhibits thapsigargin-induced Ca2+ influx. However, the nature of the signal linking pool depletion to the opening of the capacitative Ca2+ influx remains controversial. Direct proteinprotein interaction between the 1,4,5-IP3 receptor and the capacitative Ca2+ entry channel, or a diffusible messenger released or formed with Ca2+ mobilization, would stimulate Ca2+ influx (26,32). Our results suggest that propofol does not affect the signaling pathway linking AT1 receptor activation to 1,4,5-IP3 formation, but its mechanism of action on Ca2+ channels remains to be determined. The rise in intracellular-free Ca2+ is the principal mechanism initiating contraction in VSMCs. Two major types of excitation-contraction coupling have been described in VSMCs: electromechanical coupling, in which action potential and/or depolarization cause an increase in [Ca2+]i, and pharmacomechanical coupling, that occurs without necessary changes of the membrane potential (33). The relative contribution of Ca2+ release from internal stores and Ca2+ influx responsible for activation of the contractile apparatus during pharmacological coupling remains controversial (34,35). Voltage-independent Ca2+ channels are believed to not only play an important role in replenishing depleted intracellular stores, but also act as a source of activator Ca2+ for the regulation of smooth muscle tone (36). In this regard, the opening of ligand-gated channels was suggested be responsible for sustaining the contraction of several types of smooth muscle cells (33,37). In the SHR strain, the effect of propofol on Ca2+ influx was observed at a propofol concentration of 3 µg/mL (16.9 µmol/L). This corresponds to a concentration seen during propofol anesthesia (38,39). However, conclusions concerning the free concentration of this drug in the plasma or interstitial space should be made cautiously, because several factors may affect the microkinetics of propofol (9,11,12). The difference between the hypertensive and normotensive strains may be linked to the structural and functional abnormalities of the arterial wall, and to the alteration in Ca2+ handling observed in VSMCs from SHR rats (14,16,19). [Ca2+]i and Ca2+ storage pools in cultured aortic VSMCs from SHRs were found to be increased under nonstimulated conditions. The response to various agonists, including AngII, is also enhanced in the SHR rat [this study and (15)]. Furthermore, AngII signaling pathways of the normotensive and hypertensive strains have been shown to differ in several respects, suggesting a signaling pattern characteristic of the hypertensive phenotype (9,13,18,40). In this regard, we observed an increase in the amplitude of [Ca2+]i variation induced by AngII, suggesting an increase in Ca2+ mobilization from internal stores in the SHR rat, compared with WKY rats, in accordance with previous studies (13,15). However, the area under the curve was not different between the two strains, suggesting an enhanced recovery of Ca2+ to internal stores or extrusion to the external medium (41,42). Alternatively, the difference in the effect of propofol may be related to a difference in the cell membrane permeability to propofol. Further experiments are required to elucidate this point. In conclusion, the present results establish that propofol brings about a dose-dependent decrease in Ca2+ influx through capacitative Ca2+ channels elicited by AngII without altering Ca2+ mobilization from internal stores in cultured rat aortic VSMCs. The same effect is also observed in the SHR rats at a lower concentration. These results may prove useful in understanding the alteration in vascular reactivity observed during propofol anesthesia, particularly in hypertensive individuals.
We wish to thank Mr. Owen Parkes for reviewing the manuscript.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|