JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Samain, E.
Right arrow Articles by Dagher, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Samain, E.
Right arrow Articles by Dagher, G.
Anesth Analg 2000;90:546-552
© 2000 International Anesthesia Research Society


CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIA

The Effect of Propofol on Angiotensin II-Induced Ca2+ Mobilization in Aortic Smooth Muscle Cells from Normotensive and Hypertensive Rats

Emmanuel Samain, MD, PhD*, Hélène Bouillier{dagger}, Jean Marty, MD*, Michel Safar, MD, PhD{dagger}, and Georges Dagher, PhD{dagger}

*Department of Anesthesiology, Beaujon Hospital, University Xavier Bichat, Clichy; and {dagger}INSERM U337, Paris, France

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Emmanuel Samain, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, Beaujon Hospital, University Xavier Bichat, 100 Blvd. General Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We studied the effect of propofol (5.6–560 µmol/L; 1–100 µg/mL) on the mechanisms involved in Ca2+ mobilization elicited by angiotensin II (AngII) in Wistar Kyoto (WKY) and spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) rats. We studied the variations in intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) concentrations in cultured aortic vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) isolated from 6-wk-old WKY and SHR rats loaded with the Ca2+-sensitive fluorescent dye, Fura-2, using fluorescent imaging microscopy. In the absence of external Ca2+, AngII (1 µmol/L) induced a transient [Ca2+]i mobilization from internal stores that was larger in SHR than in WKY rats. Ca2+ influx was assessed after external Ca2+ (1 mmol/L) reintroduction. Propofol (1–100 µg/mL) added 5 min before the experiments did not alter AngII-induced Ca2+ release from internal stores in either strain. By contrast, Ca2+ influx elicited by AngII was significantly decreased by propofol. This effect occurred at a smaller concentration of propofol in the SHR than in the WKY rats. When Ca2+ stores were depleted by exposure of cells to thapsigargin, an inhibitor of the sarcoendoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase, reintroduction of Ca2+ to the medium induced a capacitative Ca2+ influx of similar magnitude than that elicited by AngII. This influx was also significantly decreased by propofol at 100 µg/mL (

WKY: 27 ± 3% of control values, n = 107;

SHR: 16 ± 3%, n = 47; P < 0.001). In conclusion, propofol decreased AngII-induced Ca2+ influx through voltage-independent channels, without altering Ca2+ release from internal stores in aortic VSMCs. The hypertensive rats were found to be more sensitive to the effect of propofol than the normotensive rats. This suggests that the response of VSMCs to AngII may be altered by propofol.

Implications: In rat aortic vascular smooth muscle cells, propofol reduced angiotensin II-elicited Ca2+ entry through capacitative Ca2+ channels without altering Ca2+ release from intracellular stores. Spontaneously hypertensive rats were more sensitive to these effects of propofol than normotensive rats. The response of vascular smooth muscle cells to angiotensin II may be altered by propofol.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Propofol (2,6-diisopropylphenol) causes a decrease in arterial blood pressure that is partly due to a decrease in systemic vascular resistance (1,2). A direct relaxant action of propofol on vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) may be one of the mechanisms of propofol-induced vasodilation (35). Recently, several studies have attempted to identify the cellular mechanisms implicated in the action of propofol and, in particular, how the effects of vasoactive substances are modulated. In this regard, transduction of signal through intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) mobilization is particularly important because VSMC tension is closely related to Ca2+ variations elicited by vasoactive agents (6–9). Imura et al. (10) suggested that propofol decreased norephinephrine-induced [Ca2+]i release from storage sites in VSMCs from mesenteric arteries. In cultured A10 VSMCs, derived from embryonic rat aorta, propofol moderately decreased inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (1,4,5-IP3) production induced by endothelin-1 or arginine vasopressin, but not by sodium fluoride, an activator of guanosine triphosphate-binding proteins (11,12). Furthermore, propofol was reported to inhibit Ca2+ influx through L-type channels elicited by either endothelin-1 (11,12) or norepinephrine (10). However, little is known about the effects of propofol on angiotensin II (AngII). This peptide is a potent vasoconstrictor that is important in the short-term control of blood pressure, particularly in the hypovolemic state that may be encountered in the perioperative period. The hemodynamic effects of AngII are mediated through binding to angiotensin subtype 1 (AT1) receptors, leading to Ca2+ release from internal stores and to Ca2+ influx from extracellular spaces (79).

Structural and functional abnormalities of the arterial wall have been reported in some experimental models of genetic hypertension and have been associated with an increase in Ca2+ mobilization in VSMCs in response to several agonists, especially AngII (1319). These abnormalities may be linked to the lability of blood pressure observed during general anesthesia in individuals with preexisting hypertension (20). The present study was undertaken to examine the effect of propofol on [Ca2+]i mobilization induced by AngII in VSMCs of spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) rats and a normotensive strain.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cell Culture
The study was approved by our institutional animal investigation committee and was conducted after recommendations established by the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Cultured VSMCs from thoracic aorta of 6-wk-old male SHRs with a mean arterial pressure (± SEM) of 136 ± 5 mm Hg (n = 25) and Wistar Kyoto (WKY) rats (98 ± 4 mm Hg, n = 30) were obtained by enzymatic digestion as previously described (21). In brief, aortas were incubated for 10 min in a dissecting solution containing Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Eurobio, Les Ulis, France), supplemented with glutamine (2 mmol/L), 0.1% bovine serum albumin, penicillin (100 units/mL), streptomycin (100 µg/mL), and collagenase (295 units/mL). The adventitia was stripped off mechanically, and the endothelial layer was gently scraped off. The medial layer of the aorta was then incubated for 20 min, at 37°C in dissecting solution in which CaCl2 content has been reduced to 0.8 mmol/L, and to which elastase (90 units/mL) and pronase (0.33 mg/mL) had been added. Cells were then detached by gently pipetting the tissue through a large-hole Pasteur pipette. The undigested tissue was incubated in fresh dissecting medium for another 20 min, and the procedure was then repeated twice. At the end of the digestion procedure, CaCl2 was added progressively by steps of 0.25 mmol/L to reach a final concentration of 1.6 mmol/L. To obtain secondary cultures, isolated cells were seeded at 1.5 to 2 x 105 cells/mL into 25 cm2 flasks in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Eurobio), 2 mmol/L of L-glutamine, 25 mmol/L of N-(2-hydroxyethyl) piperazine-N'-(2-ethanesulfonic) acid (HEPES), pH 7.4, 100 units/mL of penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin, and incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator. The medium was changed every 48 h. At confluence, secondary cultures were obtained by serial passage after the cells were harvested with 0.5 g/L trypsin and 0.2 g/L EDTA (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and reseeded in fresh DMEM containing 10% fetal calf serum.

Cell Ca2+ Measurements
[Ca2+]i variations were assessed in single cells by using fluorescence imaging as described previously (18). In brief, cells seeded on glass coverslips were loaded with the acetoxymethyl ester form of the Ca2+-sensitive fluorescent dye, Fura-2 (5 µmol/L, 30 min at 37°C; Molecular Probe, Junction City, OR). The coverslips were mounted on the stage of a Nikon Diaphot microscope (Nikon, Japan) fitted with a cooled integrating CCD imaging system (Newcastle Photometric System, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK). Cells were illuminated alternately at 350 and 380 nm, and the intensity of emitted light from single cells over a 500-ms period at wavelength greater than 520 nm was measured. The ratio of the light intensities at the two wavelengths, plotted against time, was used to reflect qualitative changes in [Ca2+]i (22). Because calibration procedures are prone to error and rest on a number of assumptions, no attempt was made to calibrate the ratio values (9,23,24). Therefore, qualitative changes in [Ca2+]i are represented by changes in the ratio of the emitted fluorescence at 350 nm/380 nm. Cells were superfused with Na+-HEPES solution at 37°C at a flow rate of 1 mL/min.

Cell Ca2+ variations induced by AngII were studied in single cells. As previously described, AngII induced a receptor desensitization that precluded repetitive stimulation of the same cell by AngII (25).

Because propofol is insoluble in water, we used the available form of propofol using a soya bean emulsion as solvent (Zeneca Pharma, Cergy, France). Propofol, in concentrations of 1–100 µg/mL (5.6–560 µmol/L), was added to the perfusion medium 5 min before the experiment and maintained throughout each study. We also tested the solvent itself (10 g/L soya bean oil, 22 g/L glycerol, and 12 g/L egg phosphatide; Intralipide®, Pharmacia & Upjohn SA, Saint Quentin-en-Yvelines, France) at a concentration of 10 µL/mL, corresponding to the highest concentration of propofol studied.

Fluids and Drugs
The composition of the Na+-HEPES solution (mmol/L) was 140 NaCl, 4.5 KCl, 0.8 MgCl2, 0.8 KH2PO4, 1.0 CaCl2, 5.6 glucose, and 10 HEPES. Ca2+-free Na+-HEPES solution was made without CaCl2 and with the addition of 1 mmol/L EGTA. N-methyl-glucamine (NMG)-HEPES solution was made by replacing the NaCl with NMG (Sigma). AngII, thapsigargin (a potent inhibitor of the sarcoendoplamsic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase), obtained from Sigma, CI-996 from Parke-Davis Pharmaceutical Research, CGP-48933 from Ciba-Geigy, and nifedipine from Bayer were dissolved in Na+-HEPES solution before use.

Statistical Analysis
Results are presented as the means ± SEM. The values of variables of Ca2+ mobilization measured in treated cells are expressed as percentages of the values obtained in the control (untreated) cells. Student’s t-test for unpaired data was used to compare mean values obtained in control cells to values obtained in treated cells, and to compare mean values obtained in WKY rats to those in SHR rats using Statview 4.5 software (Abacus Concepts, Inc., Berkeley, CA). A comparison of the values obtained in cells from passages 3 to 9 for each strain was performed by using analysis of variance (ANOVA), with multiple testing according to the Bonferroni method, using SuperAnova software (Abacus Concepts). P < 0.05 was considered significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Effect of AngII on Cell Ca2+
AngII addition caused a transient increase in [Ca2+]i, characterized by the amplitude and area under the Ca2+ variation over time (total Ca2+ released) (Fig. 1A). AngII-induced Ca2+ release from internal stores was assessed in Ca2+-free Na+-HEPES medium (Fig. 1B). The maximum effect was obtained at concentrations above 0.5 µmol/L (Fig. 2) (15,18). Therefore, the effect of AngII was assessed at 1 µmol/L in both strains. AT1 antagonists CGP-48 933 (100 nM) and CI-996 (100 nM) inhibited the response to AngII in both strains (>95% inhibition, P < 0.0001 for each).



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. The effect of angiotensin II (AngII; 1 µmol/L) on intracellular Ca2+: (A) in the presence of external Ca2+ (Ca0++) and (B) in the absence of external Ca2+. Ratios of the emission fluorescence (>520 nm) measured at excitation wavelengths of 350 and 380 nm are shown on the ordinate. The abscissa shows the time course of the experiments in seconds. Intracellular Ca2+ mobilizations were characterized by the amplitude (peak-basal values) of intracellular Ca2+ released; and the area under the Ca2+ variation (amount of intracellular Ca2+ mobilized). The first rate of increase in Ca2+ elicited by reintroduction of external Ca2+ to the medium (B) was measured to represent Ca2+ influx.

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effect of different concentrations of angiotensin II on the amplitude of intracellular Ca2+ increase in vascular smooth muscle cells from spontaneously hypertensive rats (•) and Wistar Kyoto rats ({triangleup}). Results are expressed as means ± SEM of 16–25 cells per concentration of angiotensin II.

 
The amplitude of Ca2+ mobilization induced by AngII was higher in the SHR than in WKY, as previously described (Table 1) (15). AngII-induced Ca2+ influx was estimated from the rate of [Ca2+]i increase after reintroduction of external Ca2+ (Fig. 1B). In preliminary experiments, [Ca2+]i changes occurring in nonstimulated cells as a consequence of Ca2+ chelation and reintroduction were found to be very low, with a mean of 0.002 ratio unit/min. AngII-induced Ca2+ influx was significantly higher in the SHR than in the WKY rat (Table 1). Ca2+ influx elicited by AngII was not significantly altered by nifedipine (5 µmol/L) in either strain (WKY: 98% ± 8% of control values, n = 73; SHR: 93% ± 14% of control values, n = 43, P: not significant [NS] for each). To assess the role of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger in AngII-induced Ca2+ influx, experiments were performed in the absence of external Na+, which had been replaced by NMG. Ca2+ influx was similar in Na+-HEPES and NMG-HEPES solution in both WKY rats (Na+-HEPES: 0.396 ± 0.024 ratio unit/min; NMG-HEPES: 0.402 ± 0.042, n = 109, P: NS) and SHR rats (Na+-HEPES: 0.481 ± 0.048 ratio unit/min; NMG-HEPES: 0.410 ± 0.040, n = 103, P: NS). This suggests that the participation of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger in Ca2+ influx is negligible under the conditions of this study.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Angiotensin II-Induced Ca2+ Mobilization in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells
 
Effect of Propofol on Ca2+ Handling
Propofol at a concentration up to 100 µg/mL did not alter the resting Ca2+ in either WKY rats (control: 0.40 ± 0.01 ratio units; propofol [100 µg/mL]: 0.37 ± 0.01, n = 102, P: NS) and SHR rats (control: 0.42 ± 0.01 ratio units; propofol [100 µg/mL]: 0.43 ± 0.02, n = 85, P: NS). Propofol did not alter AngII-induced Ca2+ release from internal stores (Fig. 3), whereas a significant decrease in Ca2+ influx elicited by AngII was observed in both WKY and SHR rats (Fig. 4). Propofol exerted its effect at a concentration of 30 µg/mL (168.5 µmol/L) in the WKY rats and at 3 µg/mL (16.9 µmol/L) in the SHR rats. Solvent alone at a dilution of 10 µL/mL did not significantly modify either resting Ca2+, or AngII-induced Ca2+ release from internal stores, or Ca2+ influx in either strain (Table 2; and Figs. 3 and 4).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. The effect of solvent (10 µL/mL) and propofol (1–100 µg/mL) in vascular smooth muscle cells from Wistar Kyoto rats (WKY; left) and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR; right) on the amplitude of intracellular Ca2+ released () and total Ca2+ release ({square}) elicited by the addition of angiotensin II. Results are expressed as the percentage of control values obtained in control, untreated cells.

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. The effect of solvent (10 µL/mL) and propofol (1–100 µg/mL) in vascular smooth muscle cells from Wistar Kyoto rats (WKY; left) and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR; right) on the intracellular Ca2+ influx elicited by addition of angiotensin II. Results are expressed as the percentage of control values obtained in control, untreated cells. *P < 0.05 propofol versus control cells. {dagger}P < 0.05 SHR versus WKY rats.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Effect of Propofol on Thapsigargin-Induced Ca2+ Influx in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells
 
Effect of Thapsigargin on Cell Ca2+
Addition of thapsigargin (3 µmol/L) in the absence of external Ca2+ induced a transient [Ca2+]i increase in both strains, at a slower rate than that observed with AngII. Reintroduction of Ca2+ (1 mmol/L) into the medium induced a Ca2+ influx of similar magnitude to that observed after stimulation with 1 µmol/L AngII. Incubation of VSMCs with thapsigargin for 5 min abolished the response to subsequent infusion of AngII in the two strains (results not shown), as previously reported (15). Furthermore, thapsigargin completely depleted [Ca2+]i stores, because ionomycin addition did not elicit any increase in cell Ca2+ (WKY: 98 ± 1% of inhibition, n = 28; SHR: 98 ± 2% of inhibition, n = 25, P < 0.001 for each). Propofol significantly decreased thapsigargin-induced Ca2+ influx in both strains (Table 2).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The present study demonstrates that propofol can alter the response of VSMCs to AngII. Propofol was found to reduce Ca2+ influx through voltage-independent Ca2+ channels elicited by AngII, but to be without effect on AngII-induced Ca2+ mobilization from internal stores in VSMCs from both SHR and WKY rats.

In aortic VSMCs, binding of AngII to AT1 receptors causes a transient increase in [Ca2+]i due to the release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores, and a Ca2+ influx across the membrane via Ca2+ channels (79,26). AngII activates phospholipase C that hydrolyzes phophatidylinositol 4,5-biphosphate, thereby releasing 1,4,5-IP3 to the cytosol. The latter moiety binds to its receptor releasing Ca2+ from storage pools. Our results show that the pathway from AT1 binding to Ca2+ mobilization is not altered by propofol. Previous studies have assessed the effect of propofol on VSMC tension (4,10,27). Propofol reduces the phasic increase in force in rabbit mesenteric arteries caused by norepinephrine (10). This was attributed to a decrease in Ca2+ release from internal stores. Heterogeneities in Ca2+ transport mechanisms elicited by G protein-coupled receptors between species and between vascular beds may account for this difference.

The depletion of Ca2+ from intracellular stores through agonist-induced release is replenished by Ca2+ influx from the extracellular space (7,26). The major finding of this study is that propofol inhibits this influx in both WKY and SHR rats. In aortic VSMCs, the major Ca2+ entry mechanism induced by AngII is voltage-independent [this study and (8,28)]. This is in contrast to other vascular beds, such as the mesenteric bed, where voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels have been reported (29). Propofol has been reported to act as a voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel blocker in several experimental models (1012). Previous studies in mesenteric VSMCs and A10 lines have shown that the voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels characteristic of these vascular beds—and elicited by norepinephrine, endothelin-1, or arginine vasopressin—are inhibited by propofol (1012,30). In VSMCs, capacitative Ca2+ influx is known to be elicited by either 1,4,5-IP3 or an increase in cell Ca2+. Studies using agents such as thapsigargin that inhibit the Ca2+-ATPase have demonstrated that Ca2+ store depletion provides a full and sufficient signal for the activation of capacitative Ca2+ entry (26,31,32). Our results show that propofol also inhibits thapsigargin-induced Ca2+ influx. However, the nature of the signal linking pool depletion to the opening of the capacitative Ca2+ influx remains controversial. Direct protein–protein interaction between the 1,4,5-IP3 receptor and the capacitative Ca2+ entry channel, or a diffusible messenger released or formed with Ca2+ mobilization, would stimulate Ca2+ influx (26,32). Our results suggest that propofol does not affect the signaling pathway linking AT1 receptor activation to 1,4,5-IP3 formation, but its mechanism of action on Ca2+ channels remains to be determined.

The rise in intracellular-free Ca2+ is the principal mechanism initiating contraction in VSMCs. Two major types of excitation-contraction coupling have been described in VSMCs: electromechanical coupling, in which action potential and/or depolarization cause an increase in [Ca2+]i, and pharmacomechanical coupling, that occurs without necessary changes of the membrane potential (33). The relative contribution of Ca2+ release from internal stores and Ca2+ influx responsible for activation of the contractile apparatus during pharmacological coupling remains controversial (34,35). Voltage-independent Ca2+ channels are believed to not only play an important role in replenishing depleted intracellular stores, but also act as a source of activator Ca2+ for the regulation of smooth muscle tone (36). In this regard, the opening of ligand-gated channels was suggested be responsible for sustaining the contraction of several types of smooth muscle cells (33,37).

In the SHR strain, the effect of propofol on Ca2+ influx was observed at a propofol concentration of 3 µg/mL (16.9 µmol/L). This corresponds to a concentration seen during propofol anesthesia (38,39). However, conclusions concerning the free concentration of this drug in the plasma or interstitial space should be made cautiously, because several factors may affect the microkinetics of propofol (9,11,12).

The difference between the hypertensive and normotensive strains may be linked to the structural and functional abnormalities of the arterial wall, and to the alteration in Ca2+ handling observed in VSMCs from SHR rats (14,16,19). [Ca2+]i and Ca2+ storage pools in cultured aortic VSMCs from SHRs were found to be increased under nonstimulated conditions. The response to various agonists, including AngII, is also enhanced in the SHR rat [this study and (15)]. Furthermore, AngII signaling pathways of the normotensive and hypertensive strains have been shown to differ in several respects, suggesting a signaling pattern characteristic of the hypertensive phenotype (9,13,18,40). In this regard, we observed an increase in the amplitude of [Ca2+]i variation induced by AngII, suggesting an increase in Ca2+ mobilization from internal stores in the SHR rat, compared with WKY rats, in accordance with previous studies (13,15). However, the area under the curve was not different between the two strains, suggesting an enhanced recovery of Ca2+ to internal stores or extrusion to the external medium (41,42). Alternatively, the difference in the effect of propofol may be related to a difference in the cell membrane permeability to propofol. Further experiments are required to elucidate this point.

In conclusion, the present results establish that propofol brings about a dose-dependent decrease in Ca2+ influx through capacitative Ca2+ channels elicited by AngII without altering Ca2+ mobilization from internal stores in cultured rat aortic VSMCs. The same effect is also observed in the SHR rats at a lower concentration. These results may prove useful in understanding the alteration in vascular reactivity observed during propofol anesthesia, particularly in hypertensive individuals.


    Acknowledgments
 
We wish to thank Mr. Owen Parkes for reviewing the manuscript.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Rouby JJ, Andreev A, Leger P, et al. Peripheral vascular effects of thiopental and propofol in humans with artificial hearts. Anesthesiology 1991;75:32–42.[Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Sebel PS, Lowdon JD. Propofol: a new intravenous anesthetic. Anesthesiology 1990;71:260–77.
  3. Bentley GN, Gent JP, Goodchild CS. Vascular effects of propofol: smooth muscle relaxation in isolated veins and arteries. J Pharm Pharmacol 1989;41:797–98.[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Park WK, Lynch CI, Johns RA. Effects of propofol and thiopental in isolated rat aorta and pulmonary artery. Anesthesiology 1992;77:956–63.[Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Gelb AW, Zhang C, Hamilton JT. Propofol induces dilation and inhibits constriction in guinea pig basilar arteries. Anesth Analg 1996;83:472–6.[Abstract]
  6. Bootman MD, Berridge MJ. The elemental principles of calcium signaling. Cell 1995;83:675–8.[Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Van Breemen C, Saida K. Cellular mechanisms regulating [Ca2+]i smooth muscle. Annu Rev Physiol 1989;51:315–29.[Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Orlov S, Resink TJ, Bernhardt J, et al. Vascular smooth muscle cell calcium fluxes. Regulation by angiotensin II and lipoproteins. Hypertension 1993;21:191–203.
  9. Berk BC, Corson MA. Angiotensin II signal transduction in vascular smooth muscle. Role of tyrosine kinases. Circ Res 1997;80:607–16.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Imura N, Shiraishi Y, Katsuya H, et al. Effect of propofol on norepinephrine-induced increases in [Ca2+]i and force in smooth muscle of the rabbit mesenteric resistance artery. Anesthesiology 1998;88:1566–78.[Web of Science][Medline]
  11. Tanabe K, Kozawa O, Kaida T, et al. Inhibitory effects of propofol on intracellular signaling by endothelin-1 in aortic smooth muscle cells. Anesthesiology 1998;88:452–60.[Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Xuan Y-T, Glass PSA. Propofol regulation of calcium entry pathways in cultured A10 and rat aortic smooth muscle cells. Br J Pharmacol 1996;117:5–12.[Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Bendhack LM, Sharma RV, Bhalla RC. Altered signal transduction in vascular smooth muscle cells of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension 1992;19 (Suppl II):II-142–II-8.
  14. Cortes SF, Lemos VS, Corriu C, et al. Changes in angiotensin II receptor density and calcium handling during proliferation in SHR aortic myocytes. Am J Physiol 1996;271:H2330–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Cortes SF, Lemos VS, Stoclet JC. Alterations in calcium stores in aortic myocytes from spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension 1997;29:1322–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Resink TJ, Scott-Burden T, Baur U, et al. Enhanced responsiveness to angiotensin II in vascular smooth muscle cells from spontaneously hypertensive is not associated with alterations in protein kinase C. Hypertension 1989;14:293–303.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Sieffert W. Genetically fixed enhanced G protein activation in essential hypertension. Kidney Blood Pres Res 1996;19:172–3.[Web of Science][Medline]
  18. Samain E, Bouillier H, Perret C, et al. Angiotensin-induced calcium increase in smooth muscle cells from spontaneous hypertensive rat is regulated by actin and microtubule networks. Am J Physiol 1999;277:H834–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Touyz RM, Tolloczko B, Schiffrin EL. Mesenteric vascular smooth muscle cells from spontaneously hypertensive rats display increased calcium responses to angiotensin II but not to endothelin-1. J Hypertens 1994;12:663–73.[Web of Science][Medline]
  20. Prys-Roberts C. Anaesthesia and hypertension. Br J Anaesth 1984;56:711–24.[Free Full Text]
  21. Pacaud P, Malam-Souley R, Loirand G, et al. ATP raises [Ca2+]i via different P2-receptor subtypes in freshly isolated and cultured aortic myocytes. Am J Physiol 1995;269:H30–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Chambers P, Neal DE, Gillespie JI. Ca2+ signalling in cultured smooth muscle cells from human bladder. Exp Physiol 1996;81:553–64.[Abstract]
  23. Williams DA, Fay FS. Intracellular calibration of the fluorescent calcium indicator Fura-2. Cell Calcium 1990;11:75–83.[Web of Science][Medline]
  24. Moore EDW, Becker PL, Fogarty KE, et al. Ca2+ imaging in living cells: theoretical and practical issues. Cell Calcium 1990;11:157–79.[Web of Science][Medline]
  25. Aboulafia J, Oshiro ME, Feres T, et al. Angiotensin II desensitization and Ca2+ and Na+ fluxes in vascular smooth muscle cells. Pflügers Arch 1989;415:230–4.[Web of Science][Medline]
  26. Berridge MJ. Capacitative calcium entry. Biochem J 1995;312:1–11.
  27. Nakamura K, Hatano Y, Hirakata H, et al. Direct vasoconstrictor and vasodilator effects of propofol in isolated dog arteries. Br J Anaesth 1992;68:193–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Capponi AM, Lew PD, Vallotton MB. Cytosolic free calcium levels in monolayers of cultured rat aortic smooth muscle cells. Effects of angiotensin II and vasopressin. J Biol Chem 1985;260:7836–42.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Touyz RM, Schiffrin EL. Tyrosine kinase signaling pathways modulate angiotensin II-induced calcium ([Ca2+]i) transients in vascular smooth muscle cells. Hypertension 1996;27:1097–103.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Chang KSK, Davis RF. Propofol produces endothelium-independent vasodilation and may act as a Ca2+ channel blocker. Anesth Analg 1993;76:24–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Hoth M, Penner R. Depletion of intracellular calcium stores activates a calcium current in mast cells. Nature 1992;355:353–6.[Medline]
  32. Putney JW Jr, Bird GSJ. The inositol phosphate-calcium signaling system in nonexcitable cells. Endocr Rev 1993;14:610–31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Himpens B, Missiaen L, Casteels R. Ca2+ homeostasis in vascular smooth muscle. Res 1995;32:207–19.
  34. Somlyo AP, Somlyo AV. Signal transduction and regulation in smooth muscle. Nature 1994;372:231–6.[Medline]
  35. Low AM, Kotecha N, Neild TO, et al. Relative contribution of extracellular Ca2+ and Ca2+ stores to smooth muscle contraction in arteries and arterioles of rat, guinea-pig, dog and rabbit. Physiol 1996;23:310–6.
  36. Gibson A, McFadzean I, Wallace P, et al. Capacitative Ca2+ entry and the regulation of smooth muscle tone. Trends Pharmacol Sci 1998;19:266–9.[Medline]
  37. Ito K, Ikemoto T, Takakura S. Involvement of Ca2+ influx-induced Ca2+ release in contractions of intact vascular smooth muscles. Am J Physiol 1991;261:H1464–70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Shyr MH, Tsai TH, Tan PP, et al. Concentration and regional distribution of propofol in brain and spinal cord during propofol anesthesia in the rat. Neurosci Lett 1995;184:212–5.[Web of Science][Medline]
  39. Ludbrook GL, Upton RN, Grant C, et al. Brain and blood concentration of propofol after rapid intravenous injection in sheep, and their relation to cerebral effects. Anaesth Intensive Care 1996;24:445–52.[Web of Science][Medline]
  40. Gros R, Benovic JL, Tan CM, et al. G-protein-coupled receptor kinase activity is increased in hypertension. J Clin Invest 1997;99:2087–93.[Web of Science][Medline]
  41. Le Jemtel TH, Lambert F, Levitsky DO, et al. Age-related changes in sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+)-ATPase and alpha-smooth muscle actin gene expression in aortas of normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rats. Circ Res 1993;72:341–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Monteith G, Kable EPW, Chen S, et al. Plasma membrane calcium pump-mediated calcium efflux and bulk cytosolic free calcium in cultured aortic smooth muscle cells from spontaneously hypertensive and Wistar-Kyoto normotensive rats. J Hypertens 1996;14:435–42.[Web of Science][Medline]
Accepted for publication November 2, 1999.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. Yu, K. Mizumoto, Y. Tokinaga, K. Ogawa, and Y. Hatano
The Inhibitory Effects of Sevoflurane on Angiotensin II- Induced, p44/42 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase-Mediated Contraction of Rat Aortic Smooth Muscle
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2005; 101(2): 315 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
T. A. Stekiel, Z. J. Bosnjak, and W. J. Stekiel
Effects of General Anesthetics on Regulation of the Peripheral Vasculature
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2003; 7(3): 311 - 331.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Samain, E.
Right arrow Articles by Dagher, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Samain, E.
Right arrow Articles by Dagher, G.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2000 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press