JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pastureau, F.
Right arrow Articles by Lebrun, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pastureau, F.
Right arrow Articles by Lebrun, T.
Anesth Analg 2000;91:763
© 2000 International Anesthesia Research Society


LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

The Prophylactic Antiemetic Efficacy of Naloxone During Patient-Controlled Opioid Analgesia

Frédéric Pastureau, MD, Alain C. Van Elstraete, MD, and Thierry Lebrun, MD

Service Anestheésie-Réanimation Clinique Saint-Paul Clairière, Fort de France, Martinique

To the Editor:

We read with great interest the article by Tramèr et al. (1) who compared prophylactic antiemetic medications in the postoperative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA)-setting with opioids. Droperidol, ondensetron, hyoscine TTS, tropisetron, metoclopramide, propofol, and promethazine were analyzed. The authors found that droperidol is statistically much more effective than placebo without evidence of dose responsiveness and that there is a lack of evidence for other antiemetics.

It would have been interesting to include naloxone in this comparative study. Indeed, Gan et al. (2) showed that naloxone is effective in preventing PCA opioid-related side effects such as pruritus, nausea, and vomiting, without reducing the duration and quality of morphine-related analgesia. Furthermore, naloxone infusion at a rate of 0.25 µg · kg-1 · h-1 not only attenuates these side effects, but appears to reduce postoperative opioid requirements. Finally, the addition of naloxone directly into morphine PCA is chemically and physically compatible.

Footnotes

Dr. Tramèr did not wish to respond to this letter.

References

  1. Tramèr MR, Walder B. Efficacy and adverse effects of prophylactic antiemetic during patient-controlled analgesia therapy: a quantitative systematic review. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 1354–61.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Gan Tong J, et al. Opioid-sparing effects of a low-dose infusion of naloxone in patient-administered morphine sulfate. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 1075–81.[Web of Science][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pastureau, F.
Right arrow Articles by Lebrun, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pastureau, F.
Right arrow Articles by Lebrun, T.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2000 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press